KPI |
2021 - Bangladesh |
Weight |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value |
Current Value |
knowledge capital
Rank 122 / Score 46.19 |
net enrollment rate in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: France 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
net enrollment rate in lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
net enrollment rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Azerbaijan 100.00
57.3% |
57.3Value: 57.3
|
years of compulsory education in primary and secondary |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Germany 100.00
38.5% |
38.5Value: 38.5
|
completion rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Kazakhstan 100.00
26.5% |
26.5Value: 26.5
|
gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
71.7% |
71.7Value: 71.7
|
assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: China 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
learning-adjusted years of schooling |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Liberia 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
35.7% |
35.7Value: 35.7
|
educational enabling environment
Rank 118 / Score 43.23 |
government expenditure on primary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Timor-Leste 100.00
22% |
22Value: 22
|
government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
12.5% |
12.5Value: 12.5
|
government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Croatia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Guatemala 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
4.7% |
4.7Value: 4.7
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
41.7% |
41.7Value: 41.7
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Malawi 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
18.8% |
18.8Value: 18.8
|
schools with access to computers in primary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
41.7% |
41.7Value: 41.7
|
schools with access to computers in secondary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
78.5% |
78.5Value: 78.5
|
gross enrollment ratio in early childhood education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Yemen 0.00 Best: Liberia 100.00
36.1% |
36.1Value: 36.1
|
proportion of children who are developmentally on track |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
60.6% |
60.6Value: 60.6
|
proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
58.8% |
58.8Value: 58.8
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
30.20 |
Worst: Niger 30.20 Best: Czech Republic 100.00
80.8% |
86.6Value: 86.6
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Iceland 100.00
24.1% |
24.1Value: 24.1
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
2.40 |
Worst: Niger 2.40 Best: Austria 100.00
77.25% |
77.8Value: 77.8
|
tvet components
Rank 39 / Score 52.32 |
firms offering formal training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Timor-Leste 0.00 Best: China 100.00
25.9% |
25.9Value: 25.9
|
Labor force with short-cycle tertiary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Latvia 100.00
87.8% |
87.8Value: 87.8
|
participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Viet Nam 0.00 Best: Paraguay 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
government expenditure on vocational education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
Share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programs |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Jamaica 0.00 Best: Bolivia 100.00
8% |
8Value: 8
|
share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Israel 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
extent of staff training |
Initial Value: 1
|
79.00 |
24.10 |
Worst: Mauritania 24.10 Best: Switzerland 79.00
26.59% |
38.7Value: 38.7
|
quality of vocational training |
Initial Value: 1
|
90.80 |
25.60 |
Worst: Angola 25.60 Best: Switzerland 90.80
21.17% |
39.4Value: 39.4
|
ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Botswana 100.00
53.8% |
53.8Value: 53.8
|
ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Malawi 100.00
52.5% |
52.5Value: 52.5
|
tvet labor market
Rank 113 / Score 50.62 |
firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
71.7% |
71.7Value: 71.7
|
employment educational mismatch (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0.00 Best: Romania 100.00
42% |
42Value: 42
|
proportion of skilled production workers |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
62.3% |
62.3Value: 62.3
|
unemployment rate with vocational education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
78.4% |
78.4Value: 78.4
|
share of tvet occupations |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
43.7% |
43.7Value: 43.7
|
manufacturing employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
51.4% |
51.4Value: 51.4
|
enrollment in vocational education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.90 |
5.60 |
Worst: Yemen 5.60 Best: Brunei Darussalam 99.90
34.78% |
38.4Value: 38.4
|
vulnerable employment rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
43% |
43Value: 43
|
inputs (higher education)
Rank 128 / Score 24.3 |
government expenditure per tertiary student |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: St. Lucia 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
3.2% |
3.2Value: 3.2
|
teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kenya 0.00 Best: Indonesia 100.00
62.6% |
62.6Value: 62.6
|
enrollment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Greece 100.00
13.7% |
13.7Value: 13.7
|
enrollment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: France 100.00
8.3% |
8.3Value: 8.3
|
pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Sudan 0.00 Best: Lebanon 100.00
29% |
29Value: 29
|
researchers in higher education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Senegal 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
learning environment
Rank 101 / Score 43.46 |
teachers in tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.30 |
0.00 |
Worst: Myanmar 0.00 Best: Panama 99.30
39.68% |
39.4Value: 39.4
|
inbound mobility rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
academic freedom |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.20 |
4.10 |
Worst: Bahrain 4.10 Best: Uruguay 97.20
23.85% |
26.3Value: 26.3
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.20 |
31.80 |
Worst: Niger 31.80 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 99.20
64.84% |
75.5Value: 75.5
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
1.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 1.00 Best: Barbados 100.00
67.37% |
67.7Value: 67.7
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
46.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: State of Palestine 46.00
41.3% |
19Value: 19
|
outputs (higher education)
Rank 108 / Score 41.06 |
Educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Lithuania 100.00
35.5% |
35.5Value: 35.5
|
educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Guatemala 0.00 Best: Georgia 100.00
21.7% |
21.7Value: 21.7
|
educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: Slovenia 100.00
11.7% |
11.7Value: 11.7
|
Labor force participation rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Venezuela 0.00 Best: Tanzania 100.00
79.1% |
79.1Value: 79.1
|
unemployment rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Trinidad and Tobago 0.00 Best: Myanmar 100.00
68.5% |
68.5Value: 68.5
|
university-industry collaboration in r&d |
Initial Value: 1
|
78.50 |
16.00 |
Worst: Angola 16.00 Best: Israel 78.50
16.64% |
26.4Value: 26.4
|
citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
inputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 90 / Score 24.13 |
gerd (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
gerd per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Botswana 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
researchers per thousand labor force |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
tertiary graduates from stem programs (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Gambia 100.00
20.6% |
20.6Value: 20.6
|
gerd performed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
gerd financed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Brunei Darussalam 0.00 Best: Thailand 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
researchers in business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
firms that spend on r&d (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
35.1% |
35.1Value: 35.1
|
high-skilled employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
13.2% |
13.2Value: 13.2
|
intellectual property payments (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Armenia 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
3.6% |
3.6Value: 3.6
|
state of cluster development |
Initial Value: 1
|
74.90 |
23.50 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 23.50 Best: Italy 74.90
39.69% |
43.9Value: 43.9
|
outputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 149 / Score 14.65 |
average documents per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0.00 Best: Panama 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
citations per document |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Indonesia 0.00 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100.00
21.6% |
21.6Value: 21.6
|
patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
19.4% |
19.4Value: 19.4
|
intellectual property receipts (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
3.7% |
3.7Value: 3.7
|
industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: China 100.00
8.8% |
8.8Value: 8.8
|
pct applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Pakistan 0.00 Best: Barbados 100.00
2.7% |
2.7Value: 2.7
|
firms producing new goods and services (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Egypt 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
39.4% |
39.4Value: 39.4
|
trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: China 100.00
7.8% |
7.8Value: 7.8
|
cultural goods exports (% exports) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Algeria 0.00 Best: St. Lucia 100.00
2.4% |
2.4Value: 2.4
|
printing and publishing output (% manufactured output) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Myanmar 100.00
1.6% |
1.6Value: 1.6
|
impact
Rank 125 / Score 18.99 |
research institutions prominence |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Albania 0.00 Best: China 100.00
19.8% |
19.8Value: 19.8
|
growth of innovative companies |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Sierra Leone 0.00 Best: Belarus 100.00
2.1% |
2.1Value: 2.1
|
iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.80 |
0.40 |
Worst: Jamaica 0.40 Best: Israel 80.80
56.59% |
45.9Value: 45.9
|
iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Bulgaria 100.00
1.7% |
1.7Value: 1.7
|
gerd financed from abroad (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Algeria 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
5.5% |
5.5Value: 5.5
|
computer software spending (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
15.1% |
15.1Value: 15.1
|
new business density per thousand population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Liberia 0.00 Best: Botswana 100.00
0.1% |
0.1Value: 0.1
|
firms with new product/service (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: St. Lucia 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
58.5% |
58.5Value: 58.5
|
infrastructure
Rank 100 / Score 38.73 |
3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
97% |
97Value: 97
|
secure internet servers per 1 million population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
2% |
2Value: 2
|
investment in telecommunication services (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100.00
28% |
28Value: 28
|
mobile upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
5.2% |
5.2Value: 5.2
|
fixed-broadband upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Algeria 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
12.6% |
12.6Value: 12.6
|
fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Switzerland 100.00
6.4% |
6.4Value: 6.4
|
fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
76.1% |
76.1Value: 76.1
|
mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
54.6% |
54.6Value: 54.6
|
internet and telephony competition |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
66.7% |
66.7Value: 66.7
|
access
Rank 116 / Score 23.56 |
active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
22.6% |
22.6Value: 22.6
|
international internet bandwidth per user |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
42.4% |
42.4Value: 42.4
|
households with internet access at home (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
37.5% |
37.5Value: 37.5
|
individuals with standard ict skills (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Togo 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
tertiary graduates from ict programs (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
13.2% |
13.2Value: 13.2
|
ict employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
2.1% |
2.1Value: 2.1
|
usage
Rank 132 / Score 25.1 |
government online services |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Hong Kong SAR 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
61.2% |
61.2Value: 61.2
|
fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
9.2% |
9.2Value: 9.2
|
mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
7.4% |
7.4Value: 7.4
|
internet users (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
8.1% |
8.1Value: 8.1
|
ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Indonesia 0.00 Best: Barbados 100.00
14% |
14Value: 14
|
e-participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Hong Kong SAR 0.00 Best: Estonia 100.00
57.1% |
57.1Value: 57.1
|
internet activities by individuals (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
15.1% |
15.1Value: 15.1
|
economic competitiveness
Rank 80 / Score 50.88 |
gross fixed capital formation (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Iraq 0.00 Best: Tanzania 100.00
71.5% |
71.5Value: 71.5
|
logistics performance |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.00 |
23.70 |
Worst: Afghanistan 23.70 Best: Germany 80.00
27.89% |
39.4Value: 39.4
|
transport productive capacity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: Belize 100.00
20.2% |
20.2Value: 20.2
|
building quality control |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
13.30 |
Worst: Liberia 13.30 Best: China 100.00
61.59% |
66.7Value: 66.7
|
ease of starting a business |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
52.40 |
Worst: Cambodia 52.40 Best: New Zealand 100.00
63.03% |
82.4Value: 82.4
|
insolvency recovery rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Japan 100.00
31.6% |
31.6Value: 31.6
|
entrepreneurial employee activity rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: China 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
extent of corporate transparency |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
42.9% |
42.9Value: 42.9
|
economic openness
Rank 128 / Score 43 |
trade (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Sudan 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
9.7% |
9.7Value: 9.7
|
high-technology trade (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
50% |
50Value: 50
|
product concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.20 |
10.90 |
Worst: Chad 10.90 Best: Croatia 94.20
59.42% |
60.4Value: 60.4
|
market concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.90 |
45.70 |
Worst: Bhutan 45.70 Best: Ukraine 96.90
92.38% |
93Value: 93
|
chinn-ito financial openness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
16.4% |
16.4Value: 16.4
|
foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
31.8% |
31.8Value: 31.8
|
debt dynamics |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
50% |
50Value: 50
|
financing and domestic value added
Rank 93 / Score 46.96 |
domestic credit to private sector (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
16.5% |
16.5Value: 16.5
|
msme financing gap (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Philippines 0.00 Best: North Macedonia 100.00
62.4% |
62.4Value: 62.4
|
tax and contribution rate (% profit) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Argentina 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
74.2% |
74.2Value: 74.2
|
bank non-performing loans (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
67.4% |
67.4Value: 67.4
|
medium- and high-tech activities value added |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cambodia 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
8.9% |
8.9Value: 8.9
|
industry and services value added (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Sierra Leone 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
61.5% |
61.5Value: 61.5
|
labor underutilization rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Benin 0.00 Best: Thailand 100.00
80.7% |
80.7Value: 80.7
|
output per worker |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
4.1% |
4.1Value: 4.1
|
governance
Rank 130 / Score 21.95 |
peace and stability |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.60 |
0.50 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.50 Best: New Zealand 97.60
15.96% |
16Value: 16
|
voice and accountability |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
3.40 |
Worst: Lao PDR 3.40 Best: Norway 100.00
24.02% |
26.6Value: 26.6
|
rule of law |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Venezuela 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
30.8% |
30.8Value: 30.8
|
control of corruption |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
1.90 |
Worst: Yemen 1.90 Best: Denmark 100.00
15.19% |
16.8Value: 16.8
|
government effectiveness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.50 |
Worst: Yemen 0.50 Best: Singapore 100.00
19.8% |
20.2Value: 20.2
|
socio-economic
Rank 117 / Score 44.52 |
female-to-male ratio in parliament |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Yemen 0.00 Best: Mexico 100.00
26.4% |
26.4Value: 26.4
|
female-to-male labor force participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Yemen 0.00 Best: Burundi 100.00
39.4% |
39.4Value: 39.4
|
female-to-male ratio in internet usage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
52.10 |
Worst: Burundi 52.10 Best: Armenia 100.00
21.29% |
62.3Value: 62.3
|
social protection coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uganda 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
adult literacy rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Ukraine 100.00
67.7% |
67.7Value: 67.7
|
youth not in employment, education or training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Iraq 0.00 Best: Japan 100.00
44.1% |
44.1Value: 44.1
|
poverty headcount ratio (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: China 100.00
66.2% |
66.2Value: 66.2
|
gdp per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
3.7% |
3.7Value: 3.7
|
health and environment
Rank 127 / Score 56.38 |
universal health coverage |
Initial Value: 1
|
87.00 |
28.00 |
Worst: Chad 28.00 Best: Australia 87.00
33.9% |
48Value: 48
|
healthy life expectancy (years) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Japan 100.00
67.2% |
67.2Value: 67.2
|
under-five mortality rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Nigeria 0.00 Best: Iceland 100.00
75% |
75Value: 75
|
renewable energy consumption (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bahrain 0.00 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100.00
31.9% |
31.9Value: 31.9
|
ecological footprint per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Luxembourg 0.00 Best: Yemen 100.00
98.2% |
98.2Value: 98.2
|
natural hazard exposure |
Initial Value: 1
|
95.00 |
16.00 |
Worst: Philippines 16.00 Best: Finland 95.00
2.53% |
18Value: 18
|