KPI |
2021 - Bolivia |
Weight |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value |
Current Value |
knowledge capital
Rank 38 / Score 80.25 |
net enrollment rate in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: France 100.00
83.8% |
83.8Value: 83.8
|
net enrollment rate in lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
90.1% |
90.1Value: 90.1
|
net enrollment rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Azerbaijan 100.00
74.8% |
74.8Value: 74.8
|
years of compulsory education in primary and secondary |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Germany 100.00
92.3% |
92.3Value: 92.3
|
completion rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Kazakhstan 100.00
70.9% |
70.9Value: 70.9
|
gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
69.6% |
69.6Value: 69.6
|
assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: China 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
learning-adjusted years of schooling |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Liberia 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
educational enabling environment
Rank 68 / Score 64.29 |
government expenditure on primary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Timor-Leste 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Croatia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Guatemala 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
87.4% |
87.4Value: 87.4
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Malawi 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
77.2% |
77.2Value: 77.2
|
schools with access to computers in primary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
14.4% |
14.4Value: 14.4
|
schools with access to computers in secondary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
25.1% |
25.1Value: 25.1
|
gross enrollment ratio in early childhood education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Yemen 0.00 Best: Liberia 100.00
61.6% |
61.6Value: 61.6
|
proportion of children who are developmentally on track |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
69.7% |
69.7Value: 69.7
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
30.20 |
Worst: Niger 30.20 Best: Czech Republic 100.00
95.85% |
97.1Value: 97.1
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Iceland 100.00
62.6% |
62.6Value: 62.6
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
2.40 |
Worst: Niger 2.40 Best: Austria 100.00
68.14% |
68.9Value: 68.9
|
tvet components
Rank 26 / Score 57.47 |
firms offering formal training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Timor-Leste 0.00 Best: China 100.00
62.1% |
62.1Value: 62.1
|
Labor force with short-cycle tertiary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Latvia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Viet Nam 0.00 Best: Paraguay 100.00
7.1% |
7.1Value: 7.1
|
government expenditure on vocational education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
Share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programs |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Jamaica 0.00 Best: Bolivia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Israel 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
extent of staff training |
Initial Value: 1
|
79.00 |
24.10 |
Worst: Mauritania 24.10 Best: Switzerland 79.00
23.5% |
37Value: 37
|
quality of vocational training |
Initial Value: 1
|
90.80 |
25.60 |
Worst: Angola 25.60 Best: Switzerland 90.80
28.07% |
43.9Value: 43.9
|
ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Botswana 100.00
20.2% |
20.2Value: 20.2
|
ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Malawi 100.00
50.1% |
50.1Value: 50.1
|
tvet labor market
Rank 74 / Score 59.72 |
firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
68.8% |
68.8Value: 68.8
|
employment educational mismatch (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0.00 Best: Romania 100.00
63.9% |
63.9Value: 63.9
|
proportion of skilled production workers |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
71% |
71Value: 71
|
unemployment rate with vocational education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
87% |
87Value: 87
|
share of tvet occupations |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
54% |
54Value: 54
|
manufacturing employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
28.9% |
28.9Value: 28.9
|
enrollment in vocational education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.90 |
5.60 |
Worst: Yemen 5.60 Best: Brunei Darussalam 99.90
97.14% |
97.2Value: 97.2
|
vulnerable employment rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
32.9% |
32.9Value: 32.9
|
inputs (higher education)
|
government expenditure per tertiary student |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: St. Lucia 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kenya 0.00 Best: Indonesia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
enrollment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Greece 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
enrollment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: France 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Sudan 0.00 Best: Lebanon 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
researchers in higher education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Senegal 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
learning environment
Rank 50 / Score 59.48 |
teachers in tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.30 |
0.00 |
Worst: Myanmar 0.00 Best: Panama 99.30
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
inbound mobility rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
academic freedom |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.20 |
4.10 |
Worst: Bahrain 4.10 Best: Uruguay 97.20
70.68% |
69.9Value: 69.9
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.20 |
31.80 |
Worst: Niger 31.80 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 99.20
98.37% |
98.1Value: 98.1
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
1.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 1.00 Best: Barbados 100.00
22.73% |
23.5Value: 23.5
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
46.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: State of Palestine 46.00
55.65% |
25.6Value: 25.6
|
outputs (higher education)
Rank 114 / Score 40.14 |
Educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Lithuania 100.00
64% |
64Value: 64
|
educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Guatemala 0.00 Best: Georgia 100.00
4.9% |
4.9Value: 4.9
|
educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: Slovenia 100.00
9% |
9Value: 9
|
Labor force participation rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Venezuela 0.00 Best: Tanzania 100.00
77.3% |
77.3Value: 77.3
|
unemployment rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Trinidad and Tobago 0.00 Best: Myanmar 100.00
61.2% |
61.2Value: 61.2
|
university-industry collaboration in r&d |
Initial Value: 1
|
78.50 |
16.00 |
Worst: Angola 16.00 Best: Israel 78.50
14.72% |
25.2Value: 25.2
|
citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
inputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 73 / Score 27.68 |
gerd (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
gerd per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Botswana 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
researchers per thousand labor force |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
tertiary graduates from stem programs (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Gambia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
gerd performed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
gerd financed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Brunei Darussalam 0.00 Best: Thailand 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
researchers in business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
firms that spend on r&d (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
31.8% |
31.8Value: 31.8
|
high-skilled employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
26.1% |
26.1Value: 26.1
|
intellectual property payments (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Armenia 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
13.9% |
13.9Value: 13.9
|
state of cluster development |
Initial Value: 1
|
74.90 |
23.50 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 23.50 Best: Italy 74.90
14.01% |
30.7Value: 30.7
|
outputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 41 / Score 43.08 |
average documents per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0.00 Best: Panama 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
citations per document |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Indonesia 0.00 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100.00
68.9% |
68.9Value: 68.9
|
patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
46.8% |
46.8Value: 46.8
|
intellectual property receipts (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
10.2% |
10.2Value: 10.2
|
industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: China 100.00
0.9% |
0.9Value: 0.9
|
pct applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Pakistan 0.00 Best: Barbados 100.00
27.7% |
27.7Value: 27.7
|
firms producing new goods and services (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Egypt 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
77.2% |
77.2Value: 77.2
|
trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: China 100.00
25.7% |
25.7Value: 25.7
|
cultural goods exports (% exports) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Algeria 0.00 Best: St. Lucia 100.00
32.8% |
32.8Value: 32.8
|
printing and publishing output (% manufactured output) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Myanmar 100.00
24.4% |
24.4Value: 24.4
|
impact
Rank 113 / Score 21.15 |
research institutions prominence |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Albania 0.00 Best: China 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
growth of innovative companies |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Sierra Leone 0.00 Best: Belarus 100.00
9.6% |
9.6Value: 9.6
|
iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.80 |
0.40 |
Worst: Jamaica 0.40 Best: Israel 80.80
44.4% |
36.1Value: 36.1
|
iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Bulgaria 100.00
5.7% |
5.7Value: 5.7
|
gerd financed from abroad (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Algeria 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
3.7% |
3.7Value: 3.7
|
computer software spending (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
23.7% |
23.7Value: 23.7
|
new business density per thousand population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Liberia 0.00 Best: Botswana 100.00
2.4% |
2.4Value: 2.4
|
firms with new product/service (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: St. Lucia 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
71.4% |
71.4Value: 71.4
|
infrastructure
Rank 115 / Score 35.23 |
3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
75.2% |
75.2Value: 75.2
|
secure internet servers per 1 million population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
2.5% |
2.5Value: 2.5
|
investment in telecommunication services (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100.00
86.8% |
86.8Value: 86.8
|
mobile upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
fixed-broadband upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Algeria 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Switzerland 100.00
2.6% |
2.6Value: 2.6
|
fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
62.1% |
62.1Value: 62.1
|
mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
49.4% |
49.4Value: 49.4
|
internet and telephony competition |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
33.3% |
33.3Value: 33.3
|
access
Rank 87 / Score 34.42 |
active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
36.7% |
36.7Value: 36.7
|
international internet bandwidth per user |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
33.8% |
33.8Value: 33.8
|
households with internet access at home (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
55.2% |
55.2Value: 55.2
|
individuals with standard ict skills (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Togo 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
tertiary graduates from ict programs (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
ict employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
12% |
12Value: 12
|
usage
Rank 82 / Score 45.48 |
government online services |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Hong Kong SAR 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
58.2% |
58.2Value: 58.2
|
fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
internet users (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
52.7% |
52.7Value: 52.7
|
ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Indonesia 0.00 Best: Barbados 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
e-participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Hong Kong SAR 0.00 Best: Estonia 100.00
59.5% |
59.5Value: 59.5
|
internet activities by individuals (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
16.2% |
16.2Value: 16.2
|
trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
30.8% |
30.8Value: 30.8
|
economic competitiveness
Rank 141 / Score 35.78 |
gross fixed capital formation (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Iraq 0.00 Best: Tanzania 100.00
40% |
40Value: 40
|
logistics performance |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.00 |
23.70 |
Worst: Afghanistan 23.70 Best: Germany 80.00
18.29% |
34Value: 34
|
transport productive capacity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: Belize 100.00
19.6% |
19.6Value: 19.6
|
building quality control |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
13.30 |
Worst: Liberia 13.30 Best: China 100.00
38.52% |
46.7Value: 46.7
|
ease of starting a business |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
52.40 |
Worst: Cambodia 52.40 Best: New Zealand 100.00
35.71% |
69.4Value: 69.4
|
insolvency recovery rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Japan 100.00
44.3% |
44.3Value: 44.3
|
entrepreneurial employee activity rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: China 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
3.6% |
3.6Value: 3.6
|
extent of corporate transparency |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
28.6% |
28.6Value: 28.6
|
economic openness
Rank 106 / Score 48.36 |
trade (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Sudan 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
21.6% |
21.6Value: 21.6
|
high-technology trade (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
41.1% |
41.1Value: 41.1
|
product concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.20 |
10.90 |
Worst: Chad 10.90 Best: Croatia 94.20
65.91% |
65.8Value: 65.8
|
market concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.90 |
45.70 |
Worst: Bhutan 45.70 Best: Ukraine 96.90
90.43% |
92Value: 92
|
chinn-ito financial openness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
44.8% |
44.8Value: 44.8
|
foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
31.6% |
31.6Value: 31.6
|
debt dynamics |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
48.4% |
48.4Value: 48.4
|
financing and domestic value added
Rank 81 / Score 48.65 |
domestic credit to private sector (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
26.7% |
26.7Value: 26.7
|
msme financing gap (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Philippines 0.00 Best: North Macedonia 100.00
90.7% |
90.7Value: 90.7
|
tax and contribution rate (% profit) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Argentina 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
23% |
23Value: 23
|
bank non-performing loans (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
94.5% |
94.5Value: 94.5
|
medium- and high-tech activities value added |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cambodia 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
11% |
11Value: 11
|
industry and services value added (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Sierra Leone 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
51.8% |
51.8Value: 51.8
|
labor underutilization rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Benin 0.00 Best: Thailand 100.00
84.7% |
84.7Value: 84.7
|
output per worker |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
6.8% |
6.8Value: 6.8
|
governance
Rank 110 / Score 29.29 |
peace and stability |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.60 |
0.50 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.50 Best: New Zealand 97.60
29.15% |
28.8Value: 28.8
|
voice and accountability |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
3.40 |
Worst: Lao PDR 3.40 Best: Norway 100.00
41.51% |
43.5Value: 43.5
|
rule of law |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Venezuela 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
12% |
12Value: 12
|
control of corruption |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
1.90 |
Worst: Yemen 1.90 Best: Denmark 100.00
23.04% |
24.5Value: 24.5
|
government effectiveness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.50 |
Worst: Yemen 0.50 Best: Singapore 100.00
30.45% |
30.8Value: 30.8
|
socio-economic
Rank 61 / Score 60.89 |
female-to-male ratio in parliament |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Yemen 0.00 Best: Mexico 100.00
85.7% |
85.7Value: 85.7
|
female-to-male labor force participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Yemen 0.00 Best: Burundi 100.00
77.1% |
77.1Value: 77.1
|
female-to-male ratio in internet usage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
52.10 |
Worst: Burundi 52.10 Best: Armenia 100.00
88.73% |
94.6Value: 94.6
|
social protection coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uganda 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
45.1% |
45.1Value: 45.1
|
adult literacy rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Ukraine 100.00
90.3% |
90.3Value: 90.3
|
youth not in employment, education or training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Iraq 0.00 Best: Japan 100.00
73.6% |
73.6Value: 73.6
|
poverty headcount ratio (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: China 100.00
47.8% |
47.8Value: 47.8
|
gdp per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
6.6% |
6.6Value: 6.6
|
health and environment
Rank 113 / Score 58.6 |
universal health coverage |
Initial Value: 1
|
87.00 |
28.00 |
Worst: Chad 28.00 Best: Australia 87.00
67.8% |
68Value: 68
|
healthy life expectancy (years) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Japan 100.00
63.8% |
63.8Value: 63.8
|
under-five mortality rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Nigeria 0.00 Best: Iceland 100.00
79.2% |
79.2Value: 79.2
|
renewable energy consumption (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bahrain 0.00 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100.00
7.9% |
7.9Value: 7.9
|
ecological footprint per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Luxembourg 0.00 Best: Yemen 100.00
79.7% |
79.7Value: 79.7
|
natural hazard exposure |
Initial Value: 1
|
95.00 |
16.00 |
Worst: Philippines 16.00 Best: Finland 95.00
46.84% |
53Value: 53
|