KPI  |
2021 |
Weight  |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value  |
Madagascar |
knowledge capital Rank 138 / Score 35.13 |
net enrolment rate in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
92.9Worst: Mali 0 Best: France 100
92.9% |
92.9Value: 92.9
|
net enrolment rate in lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
58.2Worst: Tanzania 0 Best: Israel 100
58.2% |
58.2Value: 58.2
|
net enrolment rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
26Worst: Niger 0 Best: Azerbaijan 100
26% |
26Value: 26
|
years of compulsory education in primary and secondary  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
38.5Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Germany 100
38.5% |
38.5Value: 38.5
|
completion rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
9.7Worst: Niger 0 Best: Kazakhstan 100
9.7% |
9.7Value: 9.7
|
gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
20.1Worst: Chad 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
20.1% |
20.1Value: 20.1
|
assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Dominican Republic 0 Best: China 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
learning-adjusted years of schooling  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
23.6Worst: Liberia 0 Best: Singapore 100
23.6% |
23.6Value: 23.6
|
educational enabling environment Rank 144 / Score 29.41 |
government expenditure on primary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
24.8Worst: Kazakhstan 0 Best: Timor-Leste 100
24.8% |
24.8Value: 24.8
|
government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
4.4Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Tunisia 100
4.4% |
4.4Value: 4.4
|
government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
13.1Worst: Kazakhstan 0 Best: Croatia 100
13.1% |
13.1Value: 13.1
|
government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
4.1Worst: Guatemala 0 Best: Tunisia 100
4.1% |
4.1Value: 4.1
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0Worst: Chad 0 Best: Kuwait 100
0% |
0Value: 0
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
0% |
0Value: 0
|
schools with access to computers in primary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0.5Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Armenia 100
0.5% |
0.5Value: 0.5
|
schools with access to computers in secondary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
17Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Albania 100
17% |
17Value: 17
|
gross enrolment ratio in early childhood education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
31.7Worst: Yemen 0 Best: Liberia 100
31.7% |
31.7Value: 31.7
|
proportion of children who are developmentally on track  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
46.7Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Serbia 100
46.7% |
46.7Value: 46.7
|
proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
11Worst: Gambia 0 Best: Serbia 100
11% |
11Value: 11
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
56.3Worst: Chad 0 Best: Armenia 100
56.3% |
56.3Value: 56.3
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
30.2 |
96.7Worst: Niger 30.2 Best: Czech Republic 100
95.27% |
96.7Value: 96.7
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Mozambique 0 Best: Iceland 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
2.4 |
33.8Worst: Niger 2.4 Best: Austria 100
32.17% |
33.8Value: 33.8
|
tvet components Rank 57 / Score 48.23 |
firms offering formal training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
14Worst: Timor-Leste 0 Best: China 100
14% |
14Value: 14
|
labour force with short-cycle tertiary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
71.8Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Latvia 100
71.8% |
71.8Value: 71.8
|
participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Viet Nam 0 Best: Paraguay 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
government expenditure on vocational education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Netherlands 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
share of students enrolled in secondary vocational programmes  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
4.2Worst: Jamaica 0 Best: Bolivia 100
4.2% |
4.2Value: 4.2
|
share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Israel 0 Best: Australia 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
extent of staff training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
79 |
24.1 |
41.8Worst: Mauritania 24.1 Best: Switzerland 79
32.24% |
41.8Value: 41.8
|
quality of vocational training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
90.8 |
25.6 |
43.8Worst: Angola 25.6 Best: Switzerland 90.8
27.91% |
43.8Value: 43.8
|
ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
70.8Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Botswana 100
70.8% |
70.8Value: 70.8
|
ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
42.4Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Malawi 100
42.4% |
42.4Value: 42.4
|
tvet labour market Rank 133 / Score 38.47 |
firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
81.9Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: South Africa 100
81.9% |
81.9Value: 81.9
|
employment educational mismatch (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
43.5Worst: Burkina Faso 0 Best: Romania 100
43.5% |
43.5Value: 43.5
|
proportion of skilled production workers  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
54.2Worst: Mauritania 0 Best: South Africa 100
54.2% |
54.2Value: 54.2
|
unemployment rate with vocational education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
86.2Worst: Cape Verde 0 Best: Qatar 100
86.2% |
86.2Value: 86.2
|
share of tvet occupations  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
14.4Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Qatar 100
14.4% |
14.4Value: 14.4
|
manufacturing employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
18.4Worst: Chad 0 Best: Lesotho 100
18.4% |
18.4Value: 18.4
|
enrolment in vocational education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.9 |
5.6 |
53.5Worst: Yemen 5.6 Best: Brunei Darussalam 99.9
50.8% |
53.5Value: 53.5
|
vulnerable employment rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
11.6Worst: Niger 0 Best: Qatar 100
11.6% |
11.6Value: 11.6
|
inputs (higher education) Rank 109 / Score 30.5 |
government expenditure per tertiary student  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
5.1Worst: St. Lucia 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
5.1% |
5.1Value: 5.1
|
teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
59.6Worst: Kenya 0 Best: Indonesia 100
59.6% |
59.6Value: 59.6
|
enrolment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
2.2Worst: Niger 0 Best: Greece 100
2.2% |
2.2Value: 2.2
|
enrolment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
3Worst: Burundi 0 Best: France 100
3% |
3Value: 3
|
pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
52Worst: Sudan 0 Best: Lebanon 100
52% |
52Value: 52
|
researchers in higher education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
61.1Worst: Mali 0 Best: Senegal 100
61.1% |
61.1Value: 61.1
|
learning environment Rank 65 / Score 52.13 |
teachers in tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.3 |
0 |
51.7Worst: Myanmar 0 Best: Panama 99.3
52.06% |
51.7Value: 51.7
|
inbound mobility rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
6.7Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Australia 100
6.7% |
6.7Value: 6.7
|
academic freedom  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.2 |
4.1 |
73.5Worst: Bahrain 4.1 Best: Uruguay 97.2
74.54% |
73.5Value: 73.5
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.2 |
31.8 |
98.8Worst: Niger 31.8 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 99.2
99.41% |
98.8Value: 98.8
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
1 |
21.8Worst: Mozambique 1 Best: Barbados 100
21.01% |
21.8Value: 21.8
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
46 |
0 |
NAWorst: Angola 0 Best: State of Palestine 46
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
outputs (higher education) Rank 132 / Score 32.86 |
educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
5Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Lithuania 100
5% |
5Value: 5
|
educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
5.6Worst: Guatemala 0 Best: Georgia 100
5.6% |
5.6Value: 5.6
|
educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
15.6Worst: Dominican Republic 0 Best: Slovenia 100
15.6% |
15.6Value: 15.6
|
labour force participation rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
64.3Worst: Venezuela 0 Best: Tanzania 100
64.3% |
64.3Value: 64.3
|
unemployment rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
75.8Worst: Trinidad and Tobago 0 Best: Myanmar 100
75.8% |
75.8Value: 75.8
|
university-industry collaboration in r&d  |
Initial Value: 1
|
78.5 |
16 |
32.3Worst: Angola 16 Best: Israel 78.5
26.08% |
32.3Value: 32.3
|
citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
7.3Worst: Chad 0 Best: Cyprus 100
7.3% |
7.3Value: 7.3
|
inputs (research, development and innovation) Rank 140 / Score 14.47 |
gerd (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Israel 100
0% |
0Value: 0
|
gerd per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Botswana 100
0% |
0Value: 0
|
researchers per thousand labour force  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0.3Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Denmark 100
0.3% |
0.3Value: 0.3
|
tertiary graduates from stem programmes (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
53.7Worst: Eswatini 0 Best: Gambia 100
53.7% |
53.7Value: 53.7
|
gerd performed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
gerd financed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Brunei Darussalam 0 Best: Thailand 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
researchers in business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Mozambique 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
firms that spend on r&d (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Lesotho 0 Best: Finland 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
high-skilled employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
2Worst: Mali 0 Best: United States 100
2% |
2Value: 2
|
intellectual property payments (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
8.1Worst: Armenia 0 Best: Ireland 100
8.1% |
8.1Value: 8.1
|
state of cluster development  |
Initial Value: 1
|
74.9 |
23.5 |
39.1Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 23.5 Best: Italy 74.9
30.35% |
39.1Value: 39.1
|
outputs (research, development and innovation) Rank 102 / Score 28.05 |
average documents per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
52Worst: Uzbekistan 0 Best: Panama 100
52% |
52Value: 52
|
citations per document  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
9.6Worst: Indonesia 0 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100
9.6% |
9.6Value: 9.6
|
patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
30.8Worst: Tanzania 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
30.8% |
30.8Value: 30.8
|
intellectual property receipts (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
7Worst: Angola 0 Best: Netherlands 100
7% |
7Value: 7
|
industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
30.1Worst: Dominican Republic 0 Best: China 100
30.1% |
30.1Value: 30.1
|
pct applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
34.5Worst: Pakistan 0 Best: Barbados 100
34.5% |
34.5Value: 34.5
|
firms producing new goods and services (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Egypt 0 Best: Finland 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
46.1Worst: Chad 0 Best: China 100
46.1% |
46.1Value: 46.1
|
cultural goods exports (% exports)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
7.4Worst: Algeria 0 Best: St. Lucia 100
7.4% |
7.4Value: 7.4
|
printing and publishing output (% manufactured output)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Lao PDR 0 Best: Kenya 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
impact Rank 151 / Score 5.68 |
research institutions prominence  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
4.9Worst: Albania 0 Best: China 100
4.9% |
4.9Value: 4.9
|
growth of innovative companies  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
6.8Worst: Sierra Leone 0 Best: Belarus 100
6.8% |
6.8Value: 6.8
|
iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.8 |
0.4 |
42.6Worst: Jamaica 0.4 Best: Israel 80.8
52.49% |
42.6Value: 42.6
|
iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
2Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Bulgaria 100
2% |
2Value: 2
|
gerd financed from abroad (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Algeria 0 Best: Israel 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
3.1Worst: Cape Verde 0 Best: Israel 100
3.1% |
3.1Value: 3.1
|
computer software spending (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
1.8Worst: Ethiopia 0 Best: United States 100
1.8% |
1.8Value: 1.8
|
new business density per thousand population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0.5Worst: Liberia 0 Best: Botswana 100
0.5% |
0.5Value: 0.5
|
firms with new product/service (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: St. Lucia 0 Best: Lesotho 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
infrastructure Rank 154 / Score 15.01 |
3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
37.5Worst: Niger 0 Best: Armenia 100
37.5% |
37.5Value: 37.5
|
secure internet servers per 1 million population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0.4Worst: Chad 0 Best: Denmark 100
0.4% |
0.4Value: 0.4
|
investment in telecommunication services (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
40.5Worst: Mauritania 0 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100
40.5% |
40.5Value: 40.5
|
mobile upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
4.5Worst: Niger 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
4.5% |
4.5Value: 4.5
|
fixed-broadband upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
16.2Worst: Algeria 0 Best: Singapore 100
16.2% |
16.2Value: 16.2
|
fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0.1Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Switzerland 100
0.1% |
0.1Value: 0.1
|
fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
22.8Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Kuwait 100
22.8% |
22.8Value: 22.8
|
mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
13.1Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
13.1% |
13.1Value: 13.1
|
internet and telephony competition  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Albania 100
0% |
0Value: 0
|
access Rank 125 / Score 17.6 |
active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
5.7Worst: Chad 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
5.7% |
5.7Value: 5.7
|
international internet bandwidth per user  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
10.7Worst: Ethiopia 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
10.7% |
10.7Value: 10.7
|
households with internet access at home (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
13.1Worst: Burundi 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
13.1% |
13.1Value: 13.1
|
individuals with standard ict skills (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Togo 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
tertiary graduates from ict programmes (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
57.4Worst: Eswatini 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
57.4% |
57.4Value: 57.4
|
ict employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
1.1Worst: Chad 0 Best: Israel 100
1.1% |
1.1Value: 1.1
|
usage Rank 146 / Score 19.82 |
government online services  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
28.8Worst: State of Palestine 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
28.8% |
28.8Value: 28.8
|
fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
26.1Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Kuwait 100
26.1% |
26.1Value: 26.1
|
mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
1.2Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Kuwait 100
1.2% |
1.2Value: 1.2
|
internet users (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
10.3Worst: Burundi 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
10.3% |
10.3Value: 10.3
|
ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Indonesia 0 Best: Barbados 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
e-participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
29.8Worst: State of Palestine 0 Best: Estonia 100
29.8% |
29.8Value: 29.8
|
internet activities by individuals (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Denmark 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
16.3Worst: Lao PDR 0 Best: Ireland 100
16.3% |
16.3Value: 16.3
|
economic competitiveness Rank 154 / Score 28.71 |
gross fixed capital formation (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
45.1Worst: Iraq 0 Best: Tanzania 100
45.1% |
45.1Value: 45.1
|
logistics performance  |
Initial Value: 1
|
80 |
23.7 |
34.7Worst: Afghanistan 23.7 Best: Germany 80
19.54% |
34.7Value: 34.7
|
transport productive capacity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
4.3Worst: Mauritania 0 Best: Belize 100
4.3% |
4.3Value: 4.3
|
building quality control  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
13.3 |
40Worst: Liberia 13.3 Best: China 100
30.8% |
40Value: 40
|
ease of starting a business  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
52.4 |
88.5Worst: Cambodia 52.4 Best: New Zealand 100
75.84% |
88.5Value: 88.5
|
insolvency recovery rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
13.5Worst: Chad 0 Best: Japan 100
13.5% |
13.5Value: 13.5
|
entrepreneurial employee activity rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
3.6Worst: China 0 Best: Denmark 100
3.6% |
3.6Value: 3.6
|
extent of corporate transparency  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Australia 100
0% |
0Value: 0
|
economic openness Rank 121 / Score 45.05 |
trade (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
20.3Worst: Sudan 0 Best: Ireland 100
20.3% |
20.3Value: 20.3
|
high-technology trade (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
29.6Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
29.6% |
29.6Value: 29.6
|
product concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.2 |
10.9 |
71Worst: Chad 10.9 Best: Croatia 94.2
72.15% |
71Value: 71
|
market concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.9 |
45.7 |
89.5Worst: Bhutan 45.7 Best: Ukraine 96.9
85.55% |
89.5Value: 89.5
|
chinn-ito financial openness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
16.4Worst: Angola 0 Best: Australia 100
16.4% |
16.4Value: 16.4
|
foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
46.8Worst: Angola 0 Best: Cyprus 100
46.8% |
46.8Value: 46.8
|
debt dynamics  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
49.3Worst: Mozambique 0 Best: Australia 100
49.3% |
49.3Value: 49.3
|
financing and domestic value added Rank 123 / Score 39.36 |
domestic credit to private sector (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
4.9Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
4.9% |
4.9Value: 4.9
|
msme financing gap (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
49.4Worst: Philippines 0 Best: North Macedonia 100
49.4% |
49.4Value: 49.4
|
tax and contribution rate (% profit)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
69.2Worst: Argentina 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
69.2% |
69.2Value: 69.2
|
bank non-performing loans (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
67.9Worst: Angola 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
67.9% |
67.9Value: 67.9
|
medium- and high-tech activities value added  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
3.9Worst: Cambodia 0 Best: Singapore 100
3.9% |
3.9Value: 3.9
|
industry and services value added (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
44.5Worst: Sierra Leone 0 Best: Kuwait 100
44.5% |
44.5Value: 44.5
|
labour underutilization rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
74.5Worst: Benin 0 Best: Thailand 100
74.5% |
74.5Value: 74.5
|
output per worker  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0.6Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
0.6% |
0.6Value: 0.6
|
governance Rank 121 / Score 25.21 |
peace and stability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.6 |
0.5 |
29.2Worst: Afghanistan 0.5 Best: New Zealand 97.6
29.56% |
29.2Value: 29.2
|
voice and accountability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
3.4 |
37.7Worst: Lao PDR 3.4 Best: Norway 100
35.51% |
37.7Value: 37.7
|
rule of law  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
19.7Worst: Venezuela 0 Best: Finland 100
19.7% |
19.7Value: 19.7
|
control of corruption  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
1.9 |
17.3Worst: Yemen 1.9 Best: Denmark 100
15.7% |
17.3Value: 17.3
|
government effectiveness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0.5 |
13.9Worst: Yemen 0.5 Best: Singapore 100
13.47% |
13.9Value: 13.9
|
socio-economic Rank 106 / Score 46.48 |
female-to-male ratio in parliament  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
21.8Worst: Yemen 0 Best: Mexico 100
21.8% |
21.8Value: 21.8
|
female-to-male labour force participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
93.3Worst: Yemen 0 Best: Burundi 100
93.3% |
93.3Value: 93.3
|
female-to-male ratio in internet usage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
52.1 |
NAWorst: Burundi 52.1 Best: Armenia 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
social protection coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Uganda 0 Best: Australia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
adult literacy rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
70Worst: Chad 0 Best: Ukraine 100
70% |
70Value: 70
|
youth not in employment, education or training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
93.1Worst: Iraq 0 Best: Japan 100
93.1% |
93.1Value: 93.1
|
poverty headcount ratio (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: China 100
0% |
0Value: 0
|
gdp per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0.7Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
0.7% |
0.7Value: 0.7
|
health and environment Rank 116 / Score 58.28 |
universal health coverage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
87 |
28 |
28Worst: Chad 28 Best: Australia 87
0% |
28Value: 28
|
healthy life expectancy (years)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
43.8Worst: Lesotho 0 Best: Japan 100
43.8% |
43.8Value: 43.8
|
under-five mortality rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
57.8Worst: Nigeria 0 Best: Iceland 100
57.8% |
57.8Value: 57.8
|
renewable energy consumption (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
84.6Worst: Bahrain 0 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100
84.6% |
84.6Value: 84.6
|
ecological footprint per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
97.5Worst: Luxembourg 0 Best: Yemen 100
97.5% |
97.5Value: 97.5
|
natural hazard exposure  |
Initial Value: 1
|
95 |
16 |
38Worst: Philippines 16 Best: Finland 95
27.85% |
38Value: 38
|