KPI |
2023 - Mauritius |
Weight |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value |
Current Value |
knowledge capital
Rank 37 / Score 79.34 |
net enrollment rate in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Myanmar 100.00
92.6% |
92.6Value: 92.6
|
net enrollment rate in lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: France 100.00
93.2% |
93.2Value: 93.2
|
net enrollment rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Portugal 100.00
73.7% |
73.7Value: 73.7
|
years of compulsory education in primary and secondary |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Germany 100.00
84.6% |
84.6Value: 84.6
|
completion rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
69.9% |
69.9Value: 69.9
|
gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Mauritius 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
learning-adjusted years of schooling |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
66.7% |
66.7Value: 66.7
|
educational enabling environment
Rank 70 / Score 64.54 |
government expenditure on primary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
25.5% |
25.5Value: 25.5
|
government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
61.8% |
61.8Value: 61.8
|
government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
43.8% |
43.8Value: 43.8
|
government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
57.8% |
57.8Value: 57.8
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
92.4% |
92.4Value: 92.4
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
85.3% |
85.3Value: 85.3
|
schools with access to computers in primary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
97.8% |
97.8Value: 97.8
|
schools with access to computers in secondary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
gross enrollment ratio in early childhood education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
59% |
59Value: 59
|
proportion of children who are developmentally on track |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
94.1% |
94.1Value: 94.1
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
46.60 |
Worst: Chad 46.60 Best: Uganda 100.00
64.42% |
81Value: 81
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.90 |
0.90 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.90 Best: Russian Federation 99.90
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritius 0.00 Best: Austria 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
tvet components
Rank 95 / Score 36.92 |
firms offering formal training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Saudi Arabia 0.00 Best: Ecuador 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
Labor force with short-cycle tertiary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Poland 0.00 Best: Latvia 100.00
96.8% |
96.8Value: 96.8
|
participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Sweden 100.00
7.7% |
7.7Value: 7.7
|
government expenditure on vocational education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
25.3% |
25.3Value: 25.3
|
Share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programs |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Saudi Arabia 0.00 Best: Bolivia 100.00
11.6% |
11.6Value: 11.6
|
share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Malta 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
11.4% |
11.4Value: 11.4
|
extent of staff training |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.40 |
22.60 |
Worst: Mauritania 22.60 Best: Switzerland 80.40
70.93% |
63.6Value: 63.6
|
quality of vocational training |
Initial Value: 1
|
89.50 |
21.10 |
Worst: Mauritania 21.10 Best: Switzerland 89.50
43.71% |
51Value: 51
|
ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0.00 Best: Burundi 100.00
31.2% |
31.2Value: 31.2
|
ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0.00 Best: Burundi 100.00
23.8% |
23.8Value: 23.8
|
tvet labor market
Rank 61 / Score 64.13 |
firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Spain 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
employment educational mismatch (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
63.2% |
63.2Value: 63.2
|
proportion of skilled production workers |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
unemployment rate with vocational education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
75.5% |
75.5Value: 75.5
|
share of tvet occupations |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
69.5% |
69.5Value: 69.5
|
manufacturing employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Czech Republic 100.00
40.8% |
40.8Value: 40.8
|
enrollment in vocational education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
15.00 |
Worst: Oman 15.00 Best: Uganda 100.00
44.12% |
52.5Value: 52.5
|
vulnerable employment rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
83.3% |
83.3Value: 83.3
|
inputs (higher education)
Rank 103 / Score 28.75 |
government expenditure per tertiary student |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kyrgyz Republic 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
5% |
5Value: 5
|
teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kenya 0.00 Best: Colombia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
enrollment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Greece 100.00
28% |
28Value: 28
|
enrollment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Suriname 0.00 Best: Norway 100.00
20.2% |
20.2Value: 20.2
|
pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Benin 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
51.2% |
51.2Value: 51.2
|
researchers in higher education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Senegal 100.00
63.1% |
63.1Value: 63.1
|
learning environment
Rank 68 / Score 50.3 |
teachers in tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.30 |
0.00 |
Worst: Myanmar 0.00 Best: United States 98.30
69.58% |
68.4Value: 68.4
|
inbound mobility rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100.00
24.7% |
24.7Value: 24.7
|
academic freedom |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.70 |
1.50 |
Worst: Myanmar 1.50 Best: Czech Republic 97.70
58.52% |
57.8Value: 57.8
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
24.50 |
Worst: Tanzania 24.50 Best: Bolivia 100.00
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
48.70 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Dominican Republic 48.70
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.60 |
0.70 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0.70 Best: State of Palestine 98.60
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
outputs (higher education)
Rank 24 / Score 59.25 |
Educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Guatemala 0.00 Best: Georgia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: Slovenia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
Labor force participation rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Ethiopia 100.00
95.3% |
95.3Value: 95.3
|
unemployment rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: State of Palestine 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
82.2% |
82.2Value: 82.2
|
university-industry collaboration in r&d |
Initial Value: 1
|
79.20 |
20.80 |
Worst: Myanmar 20.80 Best: Switzerland 79.20
37.16% |
42.5Value: 42.5
|
citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
17% |
17Value: 17
|
inputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 114 / Score 17.85 |
gerd (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
6.7% |
6.7Value: 6.7
|
gerd per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
16.5% |
16.5Value: 16.5
|
researchers per thousand labor force |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
7.2% |
7.2Value: 7.2
|
tertiary graduates from stem programs (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Malaysia 100.00
52.6% |
52.6Value: 52.6
|
gerd performed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
0.5% |
0.5Value: 0.5
|
gerd financed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Brunei Darussalam 0.00 Best: Thailand 100.00
5.1% |
5.1Value: 5.1
|
researchers in business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
5% |
5Value: 5
|
firms that spend on r&d (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
high-skilled employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
23.2% |
23.2Value: 23.2
|
intellectual property payments (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Armenia 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
4.7% |
4.7Value: 4.7
|
state of cluster development |
Initial Value: 1
|
71.80 |
28.70 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 28.70 Best: Saudi Arabia 71.80
52.2% |
51.2Value: 51.2
|
outputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 71 / Score 25.45 |
average documents per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Colombia 100.00
21.6% |
21.6Value: 21.6
|
citations per document |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Indonesia 0.00 Best: Cape Verde 100.00
30.1% |
30.1Value: 30.1
|
patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
34.9% |
34.9Value: 34.9
|
intellectual property receipts (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Armenia 0.00 Best: Malta 100.00
0.4% |
0.4Value: 0.4
|
industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Honduras 0.00 Best: Italy 100.00
6.7% |
6.7Value: 6.7
|
pct applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
15.6% |
15.6Value: 15.6
|
firms producing new goods and services (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Iran, Islamic Rep. 100.00
40.2% |
40.2Value: 40.2
|
cultural goods exports (% exports) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Dominican Republic 100.00
31.8% |
31.8Value: 31.8
|
printing and publishing output (% manufactured output) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Malta 100.00
37.5% |
37.5Value: 37.5
|
impact
Rank 113 / Score 19.81 |
research institutions prominence |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
29.3% |
29.3Value: 29.3
|
growth of innovative companies |
Initial Value: 1
|
72.50 |
28.70 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 28.70 Best: Israel 72.50
27.17% |
40.6Value: 40.6
|
iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tajikistan 0.00 Best: Belarus 100.00
13.3% |
13.3Value: 13.3
|
iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Bulgaria 100.00
4.6% |
4.6Value: 4.6
|
gerd financed from abroad (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
2% |
2Value: 2
|
joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Iran, Islamic Rep. 0.00 Best: Canada 100.00
10.3% |
10.3Value: 10.3
|
computer software spending (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
13.1% |
13.1Value: 13.1
|
new business density per thousand population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Estonia 100.00
29% |
29Value: 29
|
firms with new product/service (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Pakistan 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
infrastructure
Rank 32 / Score 71.82 |
3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
98.8% |
98.8Value: 98.8
|
secure internet servers per 1 million population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
54.4% |
54.4Value: 54.4
|
investment in telecommunication services (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
mobile upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
fixed-broadband upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Switzerland 100.00
44% |
44Value: 44
|
fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
90.4% |
90.4Value: 90.4
|
mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
94.2% |
94.2Value: 94.2
|
internet and telephony competition |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
access
Rank 39 / Score 50.25 |
active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
48.8% |
48.8Value: 48.8
|
international internet bandwidth per user |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
59.9% |
59.9Value: 59.9
|
households with internet access at home (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Bahrain 100.00
73.5% |
73.5Value: 73.5
|
individuals with standard ict skills (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Togo 0.00 Best: Saudi Arabia 100.00
25.8% |
25.8Value: 25.8
|
tertiary graduates from ict programs (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
60.7% |
60.7Value: 60.7
|
ict employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Trinidad and Tobago 100.00
32.8% |
32.8Value: 32.8
|
usage
Rank 88 / Score 34.28 |
government online services |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
9.50 |
Worst: Mauritania 9.50 Best: Estonia 100.00
58.9% |
62.8Value: 62.8
|
fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
23% |
23Value: 23
|
mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
12.5% |
12.5Value: 12.5
|
internet users (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Bahrain 100.00
65.6% |
65.6Value: 65.6
|
ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
6.6% |
6.6Value: 6.6
|
e-participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.90 |
2.30 |
Worst: Mauritania 2.30 Best: Australia 98.90
41.2% |
42.1Value: 42.1
|
internet activities by individuals (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: El Salvador 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
25.3% |
25.3Value: 25.3
|
trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Paraguay 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
36.3% |
36.3Value: 36.3
|
economic competitiveness
Rank 30 / Score 63.4 |
gross fixed capital formation (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ukraine 0.00 Best: Mauritania 100.00
17.6% |
17.6Value: 17.6
|
logistics performance |
Initial Value: 1
|
82.50 |
26.60 |
Worst: Burundi 26.60 Best: Singapore 82.50
19.5% |
37.5Value: 37.5
|
transport productive capacity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Seychelles 100.00
39.9% |
39.9Value: 39.9
|
building quality control |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
23.30 |
Worst: Gambia 23.30 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
91.26% |
93.3Value: 93.3
|
ease of starting a business |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
52.40 |
Worst: Cambodia 52.40 Best: New Zealand 100.00
88.45% |
94.5Value: 94.5
|
insolvency recovery rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Norway 100.00
73.3% |
73.3Value: 73.3
|
entrepreneurial employee activity rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Russian Federation 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
extent of corporate transparency |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Albania 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
71.4% |
71.4Value: 71.4
|
economic openness
Rank 55 / Score 57.5 |
trade (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: United States 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
26.1% |
26.1Value: 26.1
|
high-technology trade (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Albania 0.00 Best: Malaysia 100.00
14.7% |
14.7Value: 14.7
|
product concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.30 |
14.10 |
Worst: Mali 14.10 Best: Poland 94.30
80.8% |
78.9Value: 78.9
|
market concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.80 |
29.30 |
Worst: Mongolia 29.30 Best: Turkey 96.80
96.15% |
94.2Value: 94.2
|
chinn-ito financial openness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
70% |
70Value: 70
|
foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cyprus 0.00 Best: Hungary 100.00
34.6% |
34.6Value: 34.6
|
debt dynamics |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
80% |
80Value: 80
|
financing and domestic value added
Rank 53 / Score 53.44 |
domestic credit to private sector (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
28.2% |
28.2Value: 28.2
|
msme financing gap (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Philippines 0.00 Best: North Macedonia 100.00
95.4% |
95.4Value: 95.4
|
tax and contribution rate (% profit) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Argentina 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
85.6% |
85.6Value: 85.6
|
bank non-performing loans (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
67.8% |
67.8Value: 67.8
|
medium- and high-tech activities value added |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cambodia 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
4.7% |
4.7Value: 4.7
|
industry and services value added (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
48.5% |
48.5Value: 48.5
|
labor underutilization rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Rwanda 0.00 Best: Cambodia 100.00
78.8% |
78.8Value: 78.8
|
output per worker |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
18.5% |
18.5Value: 18.5
|
governance
Rank 32 / Score 71.85 |
peace and stability |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.20 |
1.40 |
Worst: Mali 1.40 Best: Singapore 97.20
77.35% |
75.5Value: 75.5
|
voice and accountability |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
1.90 |
Worst: Myanmar 1.90 Best: Norway 100.00
65.04% |
65.7Value: 65.7
|
rule of law |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
3.30 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 3.30 Best: Denmark 100.00
64.43% |
65.6Value: 65.6
|
control of corruption |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
3.30 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 3.30 Best: Singapore 100.00
75.08% |
75.9Value: 75.9
|
government effectiveness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
4.20 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 4.20 Best: Finland 100.00
76.83% |
77.8Value: 77.8
|
socio-economic
Rank 52 / Score 63.28 |
female-to-male ratio in parliament |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
2.40 |
Worst: Oman 2.40 Best: Mexico 100.00
23.16% |
25Value: 25
|
female-to-male labor force participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
22.30 |
Worst: Egypt 22.30 Best: Burundi 100.00
53.54% |
63.9Value: 63.9
|
female-to-male ratio in internet usage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
33.10 |
Worst: Niger 33.10 Best: Armenia 100.00
95.37% |
96.9Value: 96.9
|
social protection coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uganda 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
adult literacy rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Ukraine 100.00
89.2% |
89.2Value: 89.2
|
youth not in employment, education or training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
61.1% |
61.1Value: 61.1
|
poverty headcount ratio (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Ukraine 100.00
86.3% |
86.3Value: 86.3
|
gdp per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
19.2% |
19.2Value: 19.2
|
health and environment
Rank 86 / Score 61.77 |
universal health coverage |
Initial Value: 1
|
91.00 |
29.40 |
Worst: Chad 29.40 Best: Canada 91.00
58.93% |
65.7Value: 65.7
|
healthy life expectancy (years) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
67.2% |
67.2Value: 67.2
|
under-five mortality rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Estonia 100.00
87.1% |
87.1Value: 87.1
|
renewable energy consumption (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bahrain 0.00 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100.00
9.8% |
9.8Value: 9.8
|
ecological footprint per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Luxembourg 0.00 Best: Rwanda 100.00
77.8% |
77.8Value: 77.8
|
natural hazard exposure |
Initial Value: 1
|
95.00 |
16.00 |
Worst: Philippines 16.00 Best: Finland 95.00
59.49% |
63Value: 63
|