KPI |
2023 - Montenegro |
Weight |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value |
Current Value |
knowledge capital
Rank 56 / Score 73.29 |
net enrollment rate in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Myanmar 100.00
99.8% |
99.8Value: 99.8
|
net enrollment rate in lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: France 100.00
97.1% |
97.1Value: 97.1
|
net enrollment rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Portugal 100.00
84.8% |
84.8Value: 84.8
|
years of compulsory education in primary and secondary |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Germany 100.00
69.2% |
69.2Value: 69.2
|
completion rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
88.2% |
88.2Value: 88.2
|
gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Mauritius 100.00
68.6% |
68.6Value: 68.6
|
assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
39.5% |
39.5Value: 39.5
|
learning-adjusted years of schooling |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
61.8% |
61.8Value: 61.8
|
educational enabling environment
Rank 19 / Score 79.19 |
government expenditure on primary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
schools with access to computers in primary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
51.1% |
51.1Value: 51.1
|
schools with access to computers in secondary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
gross enrollment ratio in early childhood education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
55.4% |
55.4Value: 55.4
|
proportion of children who are developmentally on track |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
87.8% |
87.8Value: 87.8
|
proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
93.9% |
93.9Value: 93.9
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
46.60 |
Worst: Chad 46.60 Best: Uganda 100.00
89.7% |
94.5Value: 94.5
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.90 |
0.90 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.90 Best: Russian Federation 99.90
54.14% |
54.5Value: 54.5
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritius 0.00 Best: Austria 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
tvet components
Rank 84 / Score 38.78 |
firms offering formal training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Saudi Arabia 0.00 Best: Ecuador 100.00
31.1% |
31.1Value: 31.1
|
Labor force with short-cycle tertiary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Poland 0.00 Best: Latvia 100.00
59.3% |
59.3Value: 59.3
|
participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Sweden 100.00
20.1% |
20.1Value: 20.1
|
government expenditure on vocational education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
Share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programs |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Saudi Arabia 0.00 Best: Bolivia 100.00
48% |
48Value: 48
|
share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Malta 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
extent of staff training |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.40 |
22.60 |
Worst: Mauritania 22.60 Best: Switzerland 80.40
33.74% |
42.1Value: 42.1
|
quality of vocational training |
Initial Value: 1
|
89.50 |
21.10 |
Worst: Mauritania 21.10 Best: Switzerland 89.50
26.46% |
39.2Value: 39.2
|
ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0.00 Best: Burundi 100.00
18.8% |
18.8Value: 18.8
|
ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0.00 Best: Burundi 100.00
25.9% |
25.9Value: 25.9
|
tvet labor market
Rank 42 / Score 68.05 |
firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Spain 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
74.2% |
74.2Value: 74.2
|
employment educational mismatch (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
87.6% |
87.6Value: 87.6
|
proportion of skilled production workers |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
86.5% |
86.5Value: 86.5
|
unemployment rate with vocational education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
52.3% |
52.3Value: 52.3
|
share of tvet occupations |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
64.5% |
64.5Value: 64.5
|
manufacturing employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Czech Republic 100.00
19.2% |
19.2Value: 19.2
|
enrollment in vocational education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
15.00 |
Worst: Oman 15.00 Best: Uganda 100.00
86.47% |
88.5Value: 88.5
|
vulnerable employment rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
85.8% |
85.8Value: 85.8
|
inputs (higher education)
Rank 26 / Score 49.62 |
government expenditure per tertiary student |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kyrgyz Republic 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kenya 0.00 Best: Colombia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
enrollment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Greece 100.00
37.6% |
37.6Value: 37.6
|
enrollment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Suriname 0.00 Best: Norway 100.00
26.2% |
26.2Value: 26.2
|
pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Benin 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
78.4% |
78.4Value: 78.4
|
researchers in higher education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Senegal 100.00
56.3% |
56.3Value: 56.3
|
learning environment
Rank 11 / Score 75.42 |
teachers in tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.30 |
0.00 |
Worst: Myanmar 0.00 Best: United States 98.30
97.25% |
95.6Value: 95.6
|
inbound mobility rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
academic freedom |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.70 |
1.50 |
Worst: Myanmar 1.50 Best: Czech Republic 97.70
83.89% |
82.2Value: 82.2
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
24.50 |
Worst: Tanzania 24.50 Best: Bolivia 100.00
56.82% |
67.4Value: 67.4
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
48.70 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Dominican Republic 48.70
67.97% |
33.1Value: 33.1
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.60 |
0.70 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0.70 Best: State of Palestine 98.60
86.41% |
85.3Value: 85.3
|
outputs (higher education)
Rank 61 / Score 50.13 |
Educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
44.4% |
44.4Value: 44.4
|
educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Guatemala 0.00 Best: Georgia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: Slovenia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
Labor force participation rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Ethiopia 100.00
78% |
78Value: 78
|
unemployment rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: State of Palestine 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
56.9% |
56.9Value: 56.9
|
university-industry collaboration in r&d |
Initial Value: 1
|
79.20 |
20.80 |
Worst: Myanmar 20.80 Best: Switzerland 79.20
35.27% |
41.4Value: 41.4
|
citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
35.7% |
35.7Value: 35.7
|
inputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 102 / Score 20.22 |
gerd (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
6.6% |
6.6Value: 6.6
|
gerd per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
11.7% |
11.7Value: 11.7
|
researchers per thousand labor force |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
9.9% |
9.9Value: 9.9
|
tertiary graduates from stem programs (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Malaysia 100.00
50.8% |
50.8Value: 50.8
|
gerd performed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
1.2% |
1.2Value: 1.2
|
gerd financed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Brunei Darussalam 0.00 Best: Thailand 100.00
23.2% |
23.2Value: 23.2
|
researchers in business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
13.2% |
13.2Value: 13.2
|
firms that spend on r&d (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
4.2% |
4.2Value: 4.2
|
high-skilled employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
50.5% |
50.5Value: 50.5
|
intellectual property payments (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Armenia 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
4.3% |
4.3Value: 4.3
|
state of cluster development |
Initial Value: 1
|
71.80 |
28.70 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 28.70 Best: Saudi Arabia 71.80
21.58% |
38Value: 38
|
outputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 57 / Score 28.37 |
average documents per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Colombia 100.00
44.9% |
44.9Value: 44.9
|
citations per document |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Indonesia 0.00 Best: Cape Verde 100.00
29% |
29Value: 29
|
patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
44% |
44Value: 44
|
intellectual property receipts (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Armenia 0.00 Best: Malta 100.00
0.9% |
0.9Value: 0.9
|
industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Honduras 0.00 Best: Italy 100.00
1.1% |
1.1Value: 1.1
|
pct applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
6.3% |
6.3Value: 6.3
|
firms producing new goods and services (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
9.7% |
9.7Value: 9.7
|
trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Iran, Islamic Rep. 100.00
19.6% |
19.6Value: 19.6
|
cultural goods exports (% exports) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Dominican Republic 100.00
12.3% |
12.3Value: 12.3
|
printing and publishing output (% manufactured output) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Malta 100.00
59.2% |
59.2Value: 59.2
|
impact
Rank 73 / Score 28.87 |
research institutions prominence |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
30.7% |
30.7Value: 30.7
|
growth of innovative companies |
Initial Value: 1
|
72.50 |
28.70 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 28.70 Best: Israel 72.50
38.58% |
45.6Value: 45.6
|
iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tajikistan 0.00 Best: Belarus 100.00
28.6% |
28.6Value: 28.6
|
iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Bulgaria 100.00
41.7% |
41.7Value: 41.7
|
gerd financed from abroad (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
19.6% |
19.6Value: 19.6
|
joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Iran, Islamic Rep. 0.00 Best: Canada 100.00
14.6% |
14.6Value: 14.6
|
computer software spending (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
26.3% |
26.3Value: 26.3
|
new business density per thousand population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Estonia 100.00
32.7% |
32.7Value: 32.7
|
firms with new product/service (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Pakistan 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
26.9% |
26.9Value: 26.9
|
infrastructure
Rank 19 / Score 78.19 |
3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
97.4% |
97.4Value: 97.4
|
secure internet servers per 1 million population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
53.2% |
53.2Value: 53.2
|
investment in telecommunication services (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
94.1% |
94.1Value: 94.1
|
mobile upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
fixed-broadband upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Switzerland 100.00
59.1% |
59.1Value: 59.1
|
fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
88.3% |
88.3Value: 88.3
|
mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
93.4% |
93.4Value: 93.4
|
internet and telephony competition |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
access
Rank 44 / Score 49.63 |
active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
42.3% |
42.3Value: 42.3
|
international internet bandwidth per user |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
67.1% |
67.1Value: 67.1
|
households with internet access at home (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Bahrain 100.00
80.7% |
80.7Value: 80.7
|
individuals with standard ict skills (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Togo 0.00 Best: Saudi Arabia 100.00
52.3% |
52.3Value: 52.3
|
tertiary graduates from ict programs (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
27.1% |
27.1Value: 27.1
|
ict employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Trinidad and Tobago 100.00
28.3% |
28.3Value: 28.3
|
usage
Rank 54 / Score 46.48 |
government online services |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
9.50 |
Worst: Mauritania 9.50 Best: Estonia 100.00
50.61% |
55.3Value: 55.3
|
fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
26.4% |
26.4Value: 26.4
|
mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
30.2% |
30.2Value: 30.2
|
internet users (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Bahrain 100.00
87.5% |
87.5Value: 87.5
|
ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
50.1% |
50.1Value: 50.1
|
e-participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.90 |
2.30 |
Worst: Mauritania 2.30 Best: Australia 98.90
45.86% |
46.6Value: 46.6
|
internet activities by individuals (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: El Salvador 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
54.6% |
54.6Value: 54.6
|
trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Paraguay 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
21.1% |
21.1Value: 21.1
|
economic competitiveness
Rank 54 / Score 56.11 |
gross fixed capital formation (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ukraine 0.00 Best: Mauritania 100.00
21.8% |
21.8Value: 21.8
|
logistics performance |
Initial Value: 1
|
82.50 |
26.60 |
Worst: Burundi 26.60 Best: Singapore 82.50
32.92% |
45Value: 45
|
transport productive capacity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Seychelles 100.00
12.6% |
12.6Value: 12.6
|
building quality control |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
23.30 |
Worst: Gambia 23.30 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
56.58% |
66.7Value: 66.7
|
ease of starting a business |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
52.40 |
Worst: Cambodia 52.40 Best: New Zealand 100.00
72.06% |
86.7Value: 86.7
|
insolvency recovery rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Norway 100.00
54.7% |
54.7Value: 54.7
|
entrepreneurial employee activity rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Russian Federation 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
extent of corporate transparency |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Albania 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
85.7% |
85.7Value: 85.7
|
economic openness
Rank 71 / Score 49.5 |
trade (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: United States 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
28.7% |
28.7Value: 28.7
|
high-technology trade (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Albania 0.00 Best: Malaysia 100.00
14.2% |
14.2Value: 14.2
|
product concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.30 |
14.10 |
Worst: Mali 14.10 Best: Poland 94.30
68.08% |
68.7Value: 68.7
|
market concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.80 |
29.30 |
Worst: Mongolia 29.30 Best: Turkey 96.80
95.85% |
94Value: 94
|
chinn-ito financial openness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cyprus 0.00 Best: Hungary 100.00
55.2% |
55.2Value: 55.2
|
debt dynamics |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
40% |
40Value: 40
|
financing and domestic value added
Rank 90 / Score 43.72 |
domestic credit to private sector (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
16% |
16Value: 16
|
msme financing gap (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Philippines 0.00 Best: North Macedonia 100.00
79.4% |
79.4Value: 79.4
|
tax and contribution rate (% profit) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Argentina 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
85.6% |
85.6Value: 85.6
|
bank non-performing loans (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
58.1% |
58.1Value: 58.1
|
medium- and high-tech activities value added |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cambodia 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
17.9% |
17.9Value: 17.9
|
industry and services value added (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
30.8% |
30.8Value: 30.8
|
labor underutilization rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Rwanda 0.00 Best: Cambodia 100.00
39.3% |
39.3Value: 39.3
|
output per worker |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
22.7% |
22.7Value: 22.7
|
governance
Rank 57 / Score 50.35 |
peace and stability |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.20 |
1.40 |
Worst: Mali 1.40 Best: Singapore 97.20
44.78% |
44.3Value: 44.3
|
voice and accountability |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
1.90 |
Worst: Myanmar 1.90 Best: Norway 100.00
55.66% |
56.5Value: 56.5
|
rule of law |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
3.30 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 3.30 Best: Denmark 100.00
49.22% |
50.9Value: 50.9
|
control of corruption |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
3.30 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 3.30 Best: Singapore 100.00
49.74% |
51.4Value: 51.4
|
government effectiveness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
4.20 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 4.20 Best: Finland 100.00
46.35% |
48.6Value: 48.6
|
socio-economic
Rank 61 / Score 59.13 |
female-to-male ratio in parliament |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
2.40 |
Worst: Oman 2.40 Best: Mexico 100.00
24.8% |
26.6Value: 26.6
|
female-to-male labor force participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
22.30 |
Worst: Egypt 22.30 Best: Burundi 100.00
71.3% |
77.7Value: 77.7
|
female-to-male ratio in internet usage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
33.10 |
Worst: Niger 33.10 Best: Armenia 100.00
97.16% |
98.1Value: 98.1
|
social protection coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uganda 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
39.3% |
39.3Value: 39.3
|
adult literacy rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Ukraine 100.00
98.6% |
98.6Value: 98.6
|
youth not in employment, education or training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
60.5% |
60.5Value: 60.5
|
poverty headcount ratio (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Ukraine 100.00
69% |
69Value: 69
|
gdp per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
18.6% |
18.6Value: 18.6
|
health and environment
Rank 36 / Score 69.15 |
universal health coverage |
Initial Value: 1
|
91.00 |
29.40 |
Worst: Chad 29.40 Best: Canada 91.00
68.99% |
71.9Value: 71.9
|
healthy life expectancy (years) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
77.6% |
77.6Value: 77.6
|
under-five mortality rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Estonia 100.00
99.8% |
99.8Value: 99.8
|
renewable energy consumption (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bahrain 0.00 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100.00
41.1% |
41.1Value: 41.1
|
ecological footprint per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Luxembourg 0.00 Best: Rwanda 100.00
66.5% |
66.5Value: 66.5
|
natural hazard exposure |
Initial Value: 1
|
95.00 |
16.00 |
Worst: Philippines 16.00 Best: Finland 95.00
53.16% |
58Value: 58
|