KPI  |
2021 |
Weight  |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value  |
Bahrain |
knowledge capital Rank 53 / Score 76.99 |
net enrolment rate in primary education   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
92.9Worst: Sudan 0 Best: Norway 100
|
92.9Value: 92.9
|
net enrolment rate in lower secondary education   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
94.8Worst: Tanzania 0 Best: Israel 100
|
94.8Value: 94.8
|
net enrolment rate in upper secondary education   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
85.4Worst: Niger 0 Best: Azerbaijan 100
|
85.4Value: 85.4
|
years of compulsory education in primary and secondary   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
69.2Worst: Botswana 0 Best: Germany 100
|
69.2Value: 69.2
|
completion rate in upper secondary education   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Niger 0 Best: Kazakhstan 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
77.1Worst: Chad 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
|
77.1Value: 77.1
|
assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Dominican Republic 0 Best: China 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
learning-adjusted years of schooling   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
66.8Worst: Liberia 0 Best: Singapore 100
|
66.8Value: 66.8
|
educational enabling environment Rank 79 / Score 59.78 |
government expenditure on primary education (% gdp)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
18.3Worst: Kazakhstan 0 Best: Timor-Leste 100
|
18.3Value: 18.3
|
government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
18.3Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Tunisia 100
|
18.3Value: 18.3
|
government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
26.6Worst: Kazakhstan 0 Best: Croatia 100
|
26.6Value: 26.6
|
government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
26.1Worst: Guatemala 0 Best: Tunisia 100
|
26.1Value: 26.1
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
95.9Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Kuwait 100
|
95.9Value: 95.9
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
96.1Worst: Malawi 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
|
96.1Value: 96.1
|
schools with access to computers in primary education (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Cote d'Ivoire 0 Best: Switzerland 100
|
100Value: 100
|
schools with access to computers in secondary education (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Guinea 0 Best: Switzerland 100
|
100Value: 100
|
gross enrolment ratio in early childhood education   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
24.3Worst: Yemen 0 Best: Liberia 100
|
24.3Value: 24.3
|
proportion of children who are developmentally on track   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Burundi 0 Best: Serbia 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Gambia 0 Best: Serbia 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
93.7Worst: Tanzania 0 Best: Armenia 100
|
93.7Value: 93.7
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
30.2 |
NAWorst: Niger 30.2 Best: Czech Republic 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Mozambique 0 Best: Iceland 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
2.4 |
NAWorst: Niger 2.4 Best: Switzerland 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
tvet components Rank 23 / Score 58.38 |
firms offering formal training (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Timor-Leste 0 Best: China 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
labour force with short-cycle tertiary education (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Bhutan 0 Best: Latvia 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Viet Nam 0 Best: Paraguay 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
government expenditure on vocational education (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Seychelles 0 Best: Netherlands 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
share of students enrolled in secondary vocational programmes   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
10.6Worst: Jamaica 0 Best: Bolivia 100
|
10.6Value: 10.6
|
share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Israel 0 Best: United States 100
|
100Value: 100
|
extent of staff training   |
Initial Value: 1
|
79 |
24.1 |
61.9Worst: Mauritania 24.1 Best: Switzerland 79
|
61.9Value: 61.9
|
quality of vocational training   |
Initial Value: 1
|
90.8 |
25.6 |
61Worst: Angola 25.6 Best: Switzerland 90.8
|
61Value: 61
|
ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Botswana 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Rwanda 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
tvet labour market Rank 123 / Score 45.3 |
firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Afghanistan 0 Best: South Africa 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
employment educational mismatch (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Burkina Faso 0 Best: Romania 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
proportion of skilled production workers   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Tunisia 0 Best: South Africa 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
unemployment rate with vocational education   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Cape Verde 0 Best: Qatar 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
share of tvet occupations   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
26.7Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Qatar 100
|
26.7Value: 26.7
|
manufacturing employment (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
39.7Worst: Chad 0 Best: Lesotho 100
|
39.7Value: 39.7
|
enrolment in vocational education, gender parity   |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.9 |
5.6 |
15.7Worst: Yemen 5.6 Best: Brunei Darussalam 99.9
|
15.7Value: 15.7
|
vulnerable employment rate   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
99.1Worst: Niger 0 Best: Qatar 100
|
99.1Value: 99.1
|
inputs (higher education) Rank 56 / Score 43.77 |
government expenditure per tertiary student   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
36.9Worst: St. Lucia 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
|
36.9Value: 36.9
|
teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Mongolia 0 Best: Indonesia 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
enrolment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
34.6Worst: Niger 0 Best: Greece 100
|
34.6Value: 34.6
|
enrolment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
6.8Worst: Lesotho 0 Best: France 100
|
6.8Value: 6.8
|
pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
54.8Worst: Sudan 0 Best: Lebanon 100
|
54.8Value: 54.8
|
researchers in higher education (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
92.6Worst: Mali 0 Best: Senegal 100
|
92.6Value: 92.6
|
learning environment Rank 116 / Score 40.43 |
teachers in tertiary education, gender parity   |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.3 |
0 |
72.2Worst: Myanmar 0 Best: Panama 99.3
|
72.2Value: 72.2
|
inbound mobility rate   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
45Worst: Seychelles 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
|
45Value: 45
|
academic freedom   |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.2 |
4.1 |
4.1Worst: Bahrain 4.1 Best: Uruguay 97.2
|
4.1Value: 4.1
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity   |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.2 |
31.8 |
NAWorst: Niger 31.8 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 99.2
|
NAValue: NA
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
1 |
NAWorst: Mozambique 1 Best: Barbados 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity   |
Initial Value: 1
|
46 |
0 |
NAWorst: Eswatini 0 Best: State of Palestine 46
|
NAValue: NA
|
outputs (higher education) Rank 60 / Score 52.01 |
educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
60.3Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Lithuania 100
|
60.3Value: 60.3
|
educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
7.6Worst: Guatemala 0 Best: Georgia 100
|
7.6Value: 7.6
|
educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
12.7Worst: Dominican Republic 0 Best: Switzerland 100
|
12.7Value: 12.7
|
labour force participation rate with advanced education   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Venezuela 0 Best: Tanzania 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
unemployment rate with advanced education   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
94.8Worst: Trinidad and Tobago 0 Best: Myanmar 100
|
94.8Value: 94.8
|
university-industry collaboration in r&d   |
Initial Value: 1
|
78.5 |
16 |
36.8Worst: Angola 16 Best: Israel 78.5
|
36.8Value: 36.8
|
citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
31.9Worst: Chad 0 Best: Cyprus 100
|
31.9Value: 31.9
|
inputs (research, development and innovation) Rank 89 / Score 24.2 |
gerd (% gdp)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
1.8Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Israel 100
|
1.8Value: 1.8
|
gerd per researcher   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
29.2Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Qatar 100
|
29.2Value: 29.2
|
researchers per thousand labour force   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
4Worst: Rwanda 0 Best: Denmark 100
|
4Value: 4
|
tertiary graduates from stem programmes (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
28.6Worst: Eswatini 0 Best: Gambia 100
|
28.6Value: 28.6
|
gerd performed by business enterprises (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0.6Worst: Panama 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
|
0.6Value: 0.6
|
gerd financed by business enterprises (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
26.9Worst: Brunei Darussalam 0 Best: Thailand 100
|
26.9Value: 26.9
|
researchers in business enterprises (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0.1Worst: Oman 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
|
0.1Value: 0.1
|
firms that spend on r&d (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Lesotho 0 Best: Finland 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
high-skilled employment (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Mali 0 Best: United States 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
intellectual property payments (% total trade)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Qatar 0 Best: Switzerland 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
state of cluster development   |
Initial Value: 1
|
74.9 |
23.5 |
55.8Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 23.5 Best: Italy 74.9
|
55.8Value: 55.8
|
outputs (research, development and innovation) Rank 95 / Score 30.21 |
average documents per researcher   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
69Worst: Uzbekistan 0 Best: Panama 100
|
69Value: 69
|
citations per document   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
17.1Worst: Indonesia 0 Best: Moldova 100
|
17.1Value: 17.1
|
patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
30.8Worst: Tanzania 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
|
30.8Value: 30.8
|
intellectual property receipts (% total trade)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Qatar 0 Best: Netherlands 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
1Worst: Panama 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
|
1Value: 1
|
pct applications (per 100 billion gdp)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
36.5Worst: Pakistan 0 Best: Japan 100
|
36.5Value: 36.5
|
firms producing new goods and services (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Egypt 0 Best: Finland 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
2.6Worst: Chad 0 Best: China 100
|
2.6Value: 2.6
|
cultural goods exports (% exports)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
34.9Worst: Qatar 0 Best: St. Lucia 100
|
34.9Value: 34.9
|
printing and publishing output (% manufactured output)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
35Worst: Lao PDR 0 Best: Kenya 100
|
35Value: 35
|
impact Rank 80 / Score 28.41 |
research institutions prominence   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
4.8Worst: Seychelles 0 Best: United States 100
|
4.8Value: 4.8
|
growth of innovative companies   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
26.5Worst: Sierra Leone 0 Best: Italy 100
|
26.5Value: 26.5
|
iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.8 |
0.4 |
57.4Worst: Jamaica 0.4 Best: Israel 80.8
|
57.4Value: 57.4
|
iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
19.1Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Montenegro 100
|
19.1Value: 19.1
|
gerd financed from abroad (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
23.7Worst: Kuwait 0 Best: Israel 100
|
23.7Value: 23.7
|
joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
75.3Worst: Slovak Republic 0 Best: Israel 100
|
75.3Value: 75.3
|
computer software spending (% gdp)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
29.6Worst: Ethiopia 0 Best: United States 100
|
29.6Value: 29.6
|
new business density per thousand population   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
15.4Worst: Liberia 0 Best: Estonia 100
|
15.4Value: 15.4
|
firms with new product/service (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: St. Lucia 0 Best: Lesotho 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
infrastructure Rank 75 / Score 47.37 |
3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Niger 0 Best: Switzerland 100
|
100Value: 100
|
secure internet servers per 1 million population   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
3.6Worst: Niger 0 Best: Denmark 100
|
3.6Value: 3.6
|
investment in telecommunication services (% gdp)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
27.2Worst: Viet Nam 0 Best: Montenegro 100
|
27.2Value: 27.2
|
mobile upload and download speeds   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
36.4Worst: Niger 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
|
36.4Value: 36.4
|
fixed-broadband upload and download speeds   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
9.4Worst: Algeria 0 Best: Singapore 100
|
9.4Value: 9.4
|
fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
18.5Worst: Lesotho 0 Best: Switzerland 100
|
18.5Value: 18.5
|
fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
80.5Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Kuwait 100
|
80.5Value: 80.5
|
mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
59Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
|
59Value: 59
|
internet and telephony competition   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
91.7Worst: Tajikistan 0 Best: Switzerland 100
|
91.7Value: 91.7
|
access Rank 15 / Score 62.2 |
active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
48.1Worst: Chad 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
|
48.1Value: 48.1
|
international internet bandwidth per user   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
61.8Worst: Ethiopia 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
|
61.8Value: 61.8
|
households with internet access at home (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
99.9Worst: Burundi 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
|
99.9Value: 99.9
|
individuals with standard ict skills (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
68.7Worst: Togo 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
|
68.7Value: 68.7
|
tertiary graduates from ict programmes (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
32.5Worst: Eswatini 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
|
32.5Value: 32.5
|
ict employment (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Chad 0 Best: Israel 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
usage Rank 13 / Score 71.31 |
government online services   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
78.8Worst: Hong Kong SAR 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
|
78.8Value: 78.8
|
fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
49.5Worst: Slovenia 0 Best: Qatar 100
|
49.5Value: 49.5
|
mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
66.4Worst: St. Lucia 0 Best: Kuwait 100
|
66.4Value: 66.4
|
internet users (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
99.5Worst: Burundi 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
|
99.5Value: 99.5
|
ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Indonesia 0 Best: Barbados 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
e-participation   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
77.4Worst: Hong Kong SAR 0 Best: United States 100
|
77.4Value: 77.4
|
internet activities by individuals (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
68.6Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Denmark 100
|
68.6Value: 68.6
|
trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
61.2Worst: Lao PDR 0 Best: Ireland 100
|
61.2Value: 61.2
|
economic competitiveness Rank 32 / Score 63.03 |
gross fixed capital formation (% gdp)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
65.5Worst: Iraq 0 Best: Tanzania 100
|
65.5Value: 65.5
|
logistics performance   |
Initial Value: 1
|
80 |
23.7 |
48.4Worst: Afghanistan 23.7 Best: Germany 80
|
48.4Value: 48.4
|
transport productive capacity   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
55Worst: Mauritania 0 Best: United States 100
|
55Value: 55
|
building quality control   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
13.3 |
80Worst: Liberia 13.3 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
|
80Value: 80
|
ease of starting a business   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
52.4 |
89.6Worst: Cambodia 52.4 Best: New Zealand 100
|
89.6Value: 89.6
|
insolvency recovery rate   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
44.8Worst: Chad 0 Best: Japan 100
|
44.8Value: 44.8
|
entrepreneurial employee activity rate   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: China 0 Best: Denmark 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
extent of corporate transparency   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
57.1Worst: Seychelles 0 Best: Norway 100
|
57.1Value: 57.1
|
economic openness Rank 57 / Score 61.48 |
trade (% gdp)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
61.5Worst: Sudan 0 Best: Singapore 100
|
61.5Value: 61.5
|
high-technology trade (% total trade)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
44.1Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
|
44.1Value: 44.1
|
product concentration   |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.2 |
10.9 |
66Worst: Chad 10.9 Best: Italy 94.2
|
66Value: 66
|
market concentration   |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.9 |
45.7 |
91.4Worst: Mongolia 45.7 Best: Ukraine 96.9
|
91.4Value: 91.4
|
chinn-ito financial openness   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Ukraine 0 Best: Switzerland 100
|
100Value: 100
|
foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
35Worst: Iceland 0 Best: Singapore 100
|
35Value: 35
|
debt dynamics   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
36.6Worst: Venezuela 0 Best: Switzerland 100
|
36.6Value: 36.6
|
financing and domestic value added Rank 38 / Score 57.94 |
domestic credit to private sector (% gdp)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
27.7Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
|
27.7Value: 27.7
|
msme financing gap (% gdp)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Philippines 0 Best: North Macedonia 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
tax and contribution rate (% profit)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
94.1Worst: Argentina 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
|
94.1Value: 94.1
|
bank non-performing loans (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Greece 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
medium- and high-tech activities value added   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
28.7Worst: Cambodia 0 Best: Singapore 100
|
28.7Value: 28.7
|
industry and services value added (% gdp)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
82.6Worst: Sierra Leone 0 Best: Kuwait 100
|
82.6Value: 82.6
|
labour underutilization rate   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
77.5Worst: Benin 0 Best: Thailand 100
|
77.5Value: 77.5
|
output per worker   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
31.1Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
|
31.1Value: 31.1
|
governance Rank 88 / Score 40.17 |
peace and stability   |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.6 |
0.5 |
25.5Worst: Afghanistan 0.5 Best: New Zealand 97.6
|
25.5Value: 25.5
|
voice and accountability   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
3.4 |
9.2Worst: Lao PDR 3.4 Best: Norway 100
|
9.2Value: 9.2
|
rule of law   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
67.3Worst: Venezuela 0 Best: Finland 100
|
67.3Value: 67.3
|
control of corruption   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
1.9 |
53.4Worst: Yemen 1.9 Best: Denmark 100
|
53.4Value: 53.4
|
government effectiveness   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0.5 |
68.3Worst: Yemen 0.5 Best: Singapore 100
|
68.3Value: 68.3
|
socio-economic Rank 91 / Score 51.55 |
female-to-male ratio in parliament   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
17.6Worst: Yemen 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
|
17.6Value: 17.6
|
female-to-male labour force participation   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
47.4Worst: Yemen 0 Best: Rwanda 100
|
47.4Value: 47.4
|
female-to-male ratio in internet usage   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
52.1 |
100Worst: Tanzania 52.1 Best: United States 100
|
100Value: 100
|
social protection coverage (% population)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
68.1Worst: Uganda 0 Best: Sweden 100
|
68.1Value: 68.1
|
adult literacy rate   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Chad 0 Best: Ukraine 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
youth not in employment, education or training (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
57.8Worst: Iraq 0 Best: Japan 100
|
57.8Value: 57.8
|
poverty headcount ratio (% population)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Madagascar 0 Best: China 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
gdp per capita   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
36.7Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
|
36.7Value: 36.7
|
health and environment Rank 93 / Score 61.68 |
universal health coverage   |
Initial Value: 1
|
87 |
28 |
77Worst: Madagascar 28 Best: United Kingdom 87
|
77Value: 77
|
healthy life expectancy (years)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
72.5Worst: Lesotho 0 Best: Japan 100
|
72.5Value: 72.5
|
under-five mortality rate   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
95.7Worst: Nigeria 0 Best: Iceland 100
|
95.7Value: 95.7
|
renewable energy consumption (%)   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0Worst: Qatar 0 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100
|
0Value: 0
|
ecological footprint per capita   |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
33.9Worst: Luxembourg 0 Best: Yemen 100
|
33.9Value: 33.9
|
natural hazard exposure   |
Initial Value: 1
|
95 |
16 |
91Worst: Philippines 16 Best: Finland 95
|
91Value: 91
|