KPI   |
2021 |
| Weight |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value |
Peru |
 knowledge capital
Rank 56 / Score 75.09 |
| net enrolment rate in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
94.5Worst: Mali 0
Best: France 100
94.5% |
94.5Value: 94.5
|
| net enrolment rate in lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
97.6Worst: Tanzania 0
Best: Israel 100
97.6% |
97.6Value: 97.6
|
| net enrolment rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
95.9Worst: Niger 0
Best: Azerbaijan 100
95.9% |
95.9Value: 95.9
|
| years of compulsory education in primary and secondary |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
84.6Worst: Bhutan 0
Best: Germany 100
84.6% |
84.6Value: 84.6
|
| completion rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
86Worst: Niger 0
Best: Kazakhstan 100
86% |
86Value: 86
|
| gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
85.1Worst: Chad 0
Best: Luxembourg 100
85.1% |
85.1Value: 85.1
|
| assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
27.5Worst: Dominican Republic 0
Best: China 100
27.5% |
27.5Value: 27.5
|
| learning-adjusted years of schooling |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
60.6Worst: Liberia 0
Best: Singapore 100
60.6% |
60.6Value: 60.6
|
educational enabling environment
Rank 88 / Score 56.94 |
| government expenditure on primary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
29.2Worst: Kazakhstan 0
Best: Timor-Leste 100
29.2% |
29.2Value: 29.2
|
| government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
23.4Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0
Best: Tunisia 100
23.4% |
23.4Value: 23.4
|
| government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
29Worst: Kazakhstan 0
Best: Croatia 100
29% |
29Value: 29
|
| government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
24Worst: Guatemala 0
Best: Tunisia 100
24% |
24Value: 24
|
| pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Chad 0
Best: Kuwait 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Madagascar 0
Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| schools with access to computers in primary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
69.7Worst: Burundi 0
Best: Armenia 100
69.7% |
69.7Value: 69.7
|
| schools with access to computers in secondary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
82.5Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0
Best: Albania 100
82.5% |
82.5Value: 82.5
|
| gross enrolment ratio in early childhood education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
40.7Worst: Yemen 0
Best: Liberia 100
40.7% |
40.7Value: 40.7
|
| proportion of children who are developmentally on track |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Burundi 0
Best: Serbia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Gambia 0
Best: Serbia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Chad 0
Best: Armenia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
30.2 |
99.2Worst: Niger 30.2
Best: Czech Republic 100
98.85% |
99.2Value: 99.2
|
| completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
72.9Worst: Mozambique 0
Best: Iceland 100
72.9% |
72.9Value: 72.9
|
| completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
2.4 |
81.6Worst: Niger 2.4
Best: Austria 100
81.15% |
81.6Value: 81.6
|
tvet components
Rank 118 / Score 36.3 |
| firms offering formal training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
82.8Worst: Timor-Leste 0
Best: China 100
82.8% |
82.8Value: 82.8
|
| labour force with short-cycle tertiary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Bhutan 0
Best: Latvia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
46.6Worst: Viet Nam 0
Best: Paraguay 100
46.6% |
46.6Value: 46.6
|
| government expenditure on vocational education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0.6Worst: Azerbaijan 0
Best: Netherlands 100
0.6% |
0.6Value: 0.6
|
| share of students enrolled in secondary vocational programmes |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
3.2Worst: Jamaica 0
Best: Bolivia 100
3.2% |
3.2Value: 3.2
|
| share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Israel 0
Best: Australia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| extent of staff training |
Initial Value: 1
|
79 |
24.1 |
37.6Worst: Mauritania 24.1
Best: Switzerland 79
24.59% |
37.6Value: 37.6
|
| quality of vocational training |
Initial Value: 1
|
90.8 |
25.6 |
47Worst: Angola 25.6
Best: Switzerland 90.8
32.82% |
47Value: 47
|
| ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0
Best: Botswana 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Azerbaijan 0
Best: Malawi 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
tvet labour market
Rank 108 / Score 52.17 |
| firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
45Worst: Afghanistan 0
Best: South Africa 100
45% |
45Value: 45
|
| employment educational mismatch (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Burkina Faso 0
Best: Romania 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| proportion of skilled production workers |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
59Worst: Mauritania 0
Best: South Africa 100
59% |
59Value: 59
|
| unemployment rate with vocational education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Cape Verde 0
Best: Qatar 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| share of tvet occupations |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
42.9Worst: Burundi 0
Best: Qatar 100
42.9% |
42.9Value: 42.9
|
| manufacturing employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
26.6Worst: Chad 0
Best: Lesotho 100
26.6% |
26.6Value: 26.6
|
| enrolment in vocational education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.9 |
5.6 |
94.1Worst: Yemen 5.6
Best: Brunei Darussalam 99.9
93.85% |
94.1Value: 94.1
|
| vulnerable employment rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
45.4Worst: Niger 0
Best: Qatar 100
45.4% |
45.4Value: 45.4
|
inputs (higher education)
Rank 99 / Score 32.75 |
| government expenditure per tertiary student |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
5Worst: St. Lucia 0
Best: Luxembourg 100
5% |
5Value: 5
|
| teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
28.5Worst: Kenya 0
Best: Indonesia 100
28.5% |
28.5Value: 28.5
|
| enrolment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
11.7Worst: Niger 0
Best: Greece 100
11.7% |
11.7Value: 11.7
|
| enrolment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
14.9Worst: Burundi 0
Best: France 100
14.9% |
14.9Value: 14.9
|
| pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
68.2Worst: Sudan 0
Best: Lebanon 100
68.2% |
68.2Value: 68.2
|
| researchers in higher education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Mali 0
Best: Senegal 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
learning environment
Rank 44 / Score 61.68 |
| teachers in tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.3 |
0 |
50.2Worst: Myanmar 0
Best: Panama 99.3
50.55% |
50.2Value: 50.2
|
| inbound mobility rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Afghanistan 0
Best: Australia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| academic freedom |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.2 |
4.1 |
94.6Worst: Bahrain 4.1
Best: Uruguay 97.2
97.21% |
94.6Value: 94.6
|
| gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.2 |
31.8 |
93.3Worst: Niger 31.8
Best: Kyrgyz Republic 99.2
91.25% |
93.3Value: 93.3
|
| gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
1 |
37.9Worst: Mozambique 1
Best: Barbados 100
37.27% |
37.9Value: 37.9
|
| gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
46 |
0 |
21.7Worst: Angola 0
Best: State of Palestine 46
47.17% |
21.7Value: 21.7
|
outputs (higher education)
Rank 69 / Score 49.28 |
| educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Burundi 0
Best: Lithuania 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
45Worst: Guatemala 0
Best: Georgia 100
45% |
45Value: 45
|
| educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Dominican Republic 0
Best: Slovenia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| labour force participation rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
71.3Worst: Venezuela 0
Best: Tanzania 100
71.3% |
71.3Value: 71.3
|
| unemployment rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
72.6Worst: Trinidad and Tobago 0
Best: Myanmar 100
72.6% |
72.6Value: 72.6
|
| university-industry collaboration in r&d |
Initial Value: 1
|
78.5 |
16 |
30.9Worst: Angola 16
Best: Israel 78.5
23.84% |
30.9Value: 30.9
|
| citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Chad 0
Best: Cyprus 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
inputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 49 / Score 33.52 |
| gerd (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
2.4Worst: Madagascar 0
Best: Israel 100
2.4% |
2.4Value: 2.4
|
| gerd per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Madagascar 0
Best: Botswana 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| researchers per thousand labour force |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0
Best: Denmark 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| tertiary graduates from stem programmes (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
54.8Worst: Eswatini 0
Best: Gambia 100
54.8% |
54.8Value: 54.8
|
| gerd performed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Azerbaijan 0
Best: Korea, Rep. 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| gerd financed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Brunei Darussalam 0
Best: Thailand 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| researchers in business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Mozambique 0
Best: Korea, Rep. 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| firms that spend on r&d (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
47.1Worst: Lesotho 0
Best: Finland 100
47.1% |
47.1Value: 47.1
|
| high-skilled employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Mali 0
Best: United States 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| intellectual property payments (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
19.5Worst: Armenia 0
Best: Ireland 100
19.5% |
19.5Value: 19.5
|
| state of cluster development |
Initial Value: 1
|
74.9 |
23.5 |
40.1Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 23.5
Best: Italy 74.9
32.3% |
40.1Value: 40.1
|
outputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 87 / Score 31.53 |
| average documents per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Uzbekistan 0
Best: Panama 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| citations per document |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
13.5Worst: Indonesia 0
Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100
13.5% |
13.5Value: 13.5
|
| patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
40.1Worst: Tanzania 0
Best: Korea, Rep. 100
40.1% |
40.1Value: 40.1
|
| intellectual property receipts (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
9.2Worst: Angola 0
Best: Netherlands 100
9.2% |
9.2Value: 9.2
|
| industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
1.4Worst: Dominican Republic 0
Best: China 100
1.4% |
1.4Value: 1.4
|
| pct applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
49.3Worst: Pakistan 0
Best: Barbados 100
49.3% |
49.3Value: 49.3
|
| firms producing new goods and services (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
79Worst: Egypt 0
Best: Finland 100
79% |
79Value: 79
|
| trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
50.2Worst: Chad 0
Best: China 100
50.2% |
50.2Value: 50.2
|
| cultural goods exports (% exports) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
10.6Worst: Algeria 0
Best: St. Lucia 100
10.6% |
10.6Value: 10.6
|
| printing and publishing output (% manufactured output) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
52.6Worst: Lao PDR 0
Best: Kenya 100
52.6% |
52.6Value: 52.6
|
impact
Rank 84 / Score 26.98 |
| research institutions prominence |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
12.6Worst: Albania 0
Best: China 100
12.6% |
12.6Value: 12.6
|
| growth of innovative companies |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
17.3Worst: Sierra Leone 0
Best: Belarus 100
17.3% |
17.3Value: 17.3
|
| iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.8 |
0.4 |
44.1Worst: Jamaica 0.4
Best: Israel 80.8
54.35% |
44.1Value: 44.1
|
| iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
20.8Worst: Afghanistan 0
Best: Bulgaria 100
20.8% |
20.8Value: 20.8
|
| gerd financed from abroad (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Algeria 0
Best: Israel 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
2.4Worst: Cape Verde 0
Best: Israel 100
2.4% |
2.4Value: 2.4
|
| computer software spending (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
22.8Worst: Ethiopia 0
Best: United States 100
22.8% |
22.8Value: 22.8
|
| new business density per thousand population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
18.6Worst: Liberia 0
Best: Botswana 100
18.6% |
18.6Value: 18.6
|
| firms with new product/service (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
70.7Worst: St. Lucia 0
Best: Lesotho 100
70.7% |
70.7Value: 70.7
|
infrastructure
Rank 94 / Score 41.22 |
| 3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
58.1Worst: Niger 0
Best: Armenia 100
58.1% |
58.1Value: 58.1
|
| secure internet servers per 1 million population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
3.8Worst: Chad 0
Best: Denmark 100
3.8% |
3.8Value: 3.8
|
| investment in telecommunication services (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
39Worst: Mauritania 0
Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100
39% |
39Value: 39
|
| mobile upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
20.5Worst: Niger 0
Best: United Arab Emirates 100
20.5% |
20.5Value: 20.5
|
| fixed-broadband upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
8.8Worst: Algeria 0
Best: Singapore 100
8.8% |
8.8Value: 8.8
|
| fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
9.9Worst: Afghanistan 0
Best: Switzerland 100
9.9% |
9.9Value: 9.9
|
| fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
71.9Worst: Burundi 0
Best: Kuwait 100
71.9% |
71.9Value: 71.9
|
| mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
59Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0
Best: Luxembourg 100
59% |
59Value: 59
|
| internet and telephony competition |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Madagascar 0
Best: Albania 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
access
Rank 104 / Score 28.6 |
| active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
28.3Worst: Chad 0
Best: United Arab Emirates 100
28.3% |
28.3Value: 28.3
|
| international internet bandwidth per user |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
34.1Worst: Ethiopia 0
Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
34.1% |
34.1Value: 34.1
|
| households with internet access at home (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
38.6Worst: Burundi 0
Best: United Arab Emirates 100
38.6% |
38.6Value: 38.6
|
| individuals with standard ict skills (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
20.3Worst: Togo 0
Best: United Arab Emirates 100
20.3% |
20.3Value: 20.3
|
| tertiary graduates from ict programmes (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
41.8Worst: Eswatini 0
Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
41.8% |
41.8Value: 41.8
|
| ict employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
8.5Worst: Chad 0
Best: Israel 100
8.5% |
8.5Value: 8.5
|
usage
Rank 47 / Score 55.69 |
| government online services |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
75.3Worst: State of Palestine 0
Best: Korea, Rep. 100
75.3% |
75.3Value: 75.3
|
| fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Bhutan 0
Best: Kuwait 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Bhutan 0
Best: Kuwait 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| internet users (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
63.3Worst: Burundi 0
Best: United Arab Emirates 100
63.3% |
63.3Value: 63.3
|
| ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
25.3Worst: Indonesia 0
Best: Barbados 100
25.3% |
25.3Value: 25.3
|
| e-participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
76.2Worst: State of Palestine 0
Best: Estonia 100
76.2% |
76.2Value: 76.2
|
| internet activities by individuals (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
33.2Worst: Azerbaijan 0
Best: Denmark 100
33.2% |
33.2Value: 33.2
|
| trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
33.6Worst: Lao PDR 0
Best: Ireland 100
33.6% |
33.6Value: 33.6
|
economic competitiveness
Rank 83 / Score 49.51 |
| gross fixed capital formation (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
41.8Worst: Iraq 0
Best: Tanzania 100
41.8% |
41.8Value: 41.8
|
| logistics performance |
Initial Value: 1
|
80 |
23.7 |
42.3Worst: Afghanistan 23.7
Best: Germany 80
33.04% |
42.3Value: 42.3
|
| transport productive capacity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
26.2Worst: Mauritania 0
Best: Belize 100
26.2% |
26.2Value: 26.2
|
| building quality control |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
13.3 |
86.7Worst: Liberia 13.3
Best: China 100
84.66% |
86.7Value: 86.7
|
| ease of starting a business |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
52.4 |
82.1Worst: Cambodia 52.4
Best: New Zealand 100
62.39% |
82.1Value: 82.1
|
| insolvency recovery rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
34Worst: Chad 0
Best: Japan 100
34% |
34Value: 34
|
| entrepreneurial employee activity rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
11.6Worst: China 0
Best: Denmark 100
11.6% |
11.6Value: 11.6
|
| extent of corporate transparency |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
71.4Worst: Afghanistan 0
Best: Australia 100
71.4% |
71.4Value: 71.4
|
economic openness
Rank 39 / Score 67.82 |
| trade (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
15.5Worst: Sudan 0
Best: Ireland 100
15.5% |
15.5Value: 15.5
|
| high-technology trade (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
43.2Worst: Afghanistan 0
Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
43.2% |
43.2Value: 43.2
|
| product concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.2 |
10.9 |
69.9Worst: Chad 10.9
Best: Croatia 94.2
70.83% |
69.9Value: 69.9
|
| market concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.9 |
45.7 |
87.8Worst: Bhutan 45.7
Best: Ukraine 96.9
82.23% |
87.8Value: 87.8
|
| chinn-ito financial openness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Angola 0
Best: Australia 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
| foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
44.6Worst: Angola 0
Best: Cyprus 100
44.6% |
44.6Value: 44.6
|
| debt dynamics |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Mozambique 0
Best: Australia 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
financing and domestic value added
Rank 58 / Score 53.65 |
| domestic credit to private sector (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
20.4Worst: Afghanistan 0
Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
20.4% |
20.4Value: 20.4
|
| msme financing gap (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
92.4Worst: Philippines 0
Best: North Macedonia 100
92.4% |
92.4Value: 92.4
|
| tax and contribution rate (% profit) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
70.7Worst: Argentina 0
Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
70.7% |
70.7Value: 70.7
|
| bank non-performing loans (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
83.1Worst: Angola 0
Best: Korea, Rep. 100
83.1% |
83.1Value: 83.1
|
| medium- and high-tech activities value added |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
17.5Worst: Cambodia 0
Best: Singapore 100
17.5% |
17.5Value: 17.5
|
| industry and services value added (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
63.5Worst: Sierra Leone 0
Best: Kuwait 100
63.5% |
63.5Value: 63.5
|
| labour underutilization rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
72.8Worst: Benin 0
Best: Thailand 100
72.8% |
72.8Value: 72.8
|
| output per worker |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
8.8Worst: Burundi 0
Best: Luxembourg 100
8.8% |
8.8Value: 8.8
|
governance
Rank 82 / Score 42.88 |
| peace and stability |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.6 |
0.5 |
38.7Worst: Afghanistan 0.5
Best: New Zealand 97.6
39.34% |
38.7Value: 38.7
|
| voice and accountability |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
3.4 |
54.6Worst: Lao PDR 3.4
Best: Norway 100
53% |
54.6Value: 54.6
|
| rule of law |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
41.3Worst: Venezuela 0
Best: Finland 100
41.3% |
41.3Value: 41.3
|
| control of corruption |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
1.9 |
33.7Worst: Yemen 1.9
Best: Denmark 100
32.42% |
33.7Value: 33.7
|
| government effectiveness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0.5 |
42.3Worst: Yemen 0.5
Best: Singapore 100
42.01% |
42.3Value: 42.3
|
socio-economic
Rank 60 / Score 60.97 |
| female-to-male ratio in parliament |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
66.7Worst: Yemen 0
Best: Mexico 100
66.7% |
66.7Value: 66.7
|
| female-to-male labour force participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
81.1Worst: Yemen 0
Best: Burundi 100
81.1% |
81.1Value: 81.1
|
| female-to-male ratio in internet usage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
52.1 |
92Worst: Burundi 52.1
Best: Armenia 100
83.3% |
92Value: 92
|
| social protection coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
27.3Worst: Uganda 0
Best: Australia 100
27.3% |
27.3Value: 27.3
|
| adult literacy rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
92.9Worst: Chad 0
Best: Ukraine 100
92.9% |
92.9Value: 92.9
|
| youth not in employment, education or training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
66.3Worst: Iraq 0
Best: Japan 100
66.3% |
66.3Value: 66.3
|
| poverty headcount ratio (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
72Worst: Madagascar 0
Best: China 100
72% |
72Value: 72
|
| gdp per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
9.6Worst: Burundi 0
Best: Luxembourg 100
9.6% |
9.6Value: 9.6
|
health and environment
Rank 53 / Score 66.18 |
| universal health coverage |
Initial Value: 1
|
87 |
28 |
77Worst: Chad 28
Best: Australia 87
83.05% |
77Value: 77
|
| healthy life expectancy (years) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
84.6Worst: Lesotho 0
Best: Japan 100
84.6% |
84.6Value: 84.6
|
| under-five mortality rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
90.2Worst: Nigeria 0
Best: Iceland 100
90.2% |
90.2Value: 90.2
|
| renewable energy consumption (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
28.9Worst: Bahrain 0
Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100
28.9% |
28.9Value: 28.9
|
| ecological footprint per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
87.4Worst: Luxembourg 0
Best: Yemen 100
87.4% |
87.4Value: 87.4
|
| natural hazard exposure |
Initial Value: 1
|
95 |
16 |
29Worst: Philippines 16
Best: Finland 95
16.46% |
29Value: 29
|
ESCWA
Sign in / Register