KPI  |
2021 |
Weight  |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value  |
Portugal |
knowledge capital Rank 20 / Score 84.55 |
net enrolment rate in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
98.9Worst: Mali 0 Best: France 100
98.9% |
98.9Value: 98.9
|
net enrolment rate in lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
99.8Worst: Tanzania 0 Best: Israel 100
99.8% |
99.8Value: 99.8
|
net enrolment rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
99.9Worst: Niger 0 Best: Azerbaijan 100
99.9% |
99.9Value: 99.9
|
years of compulsory education in primary and secondary  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
92.3Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Germany 100
92.3% |
92.3Value: 92.3
|
completion rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
67.3Worst: Niger 0 Best: Kazakhstan 100
67.3% |
67.3Value: 67.3
|
gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
77.3Worst: Chad 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
77.3% |
77.3Value: 77.3
|
assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
64.5Worst: Dominican Republic 0 Best: China 100
64.5% |
64.5Value: 64.5
|
learning-adjusted years of schooling  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
85.8Worst: Liberia 0 Best: Singapore 100
85.8% |
85.8Value: 85.8
|
educational enabling environment Rank 32 / Score 73.15 |
government expenditure on primary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
32Worst: Kazakhstan 0 Best: Timor-Leste 100
32% |
32Value: 32
|
government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
41.2Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Tunisia 100
41.2% |
41.2Value: 41.2
|
government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
56Worst: Kazakhstan 0 Best: Croatia 100
56% |
56Value: 56
|
government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
47.1Worst: Guatemala 0 Best: Tunisia 100
47.1% |
47.1Value: 47.1
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Chad 0 Best: Kuwait 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Madagascar 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
schools with access to computers in primary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Armenia 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
schools with access to computers in secondary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Albania 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
gross enrolment ratio in early childhood education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Yemen 0 Best: Liberia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
proportion of children who are developmentally on track  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Burundi 0 Best: Serbia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Gambia 0 Best: Serbia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Chad 0 Best: Armenia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
30.2 |
79Worst: Niger 30.2 Best: Czech Republic 100
69.91% |
79Value: 79
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
48.9Worst: Mozambique 0 Best: Iceland 100
48.9% |
48.9Value: 48.9
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
2.4 |
98.2Worst: Niger 2.4 Best: Austria 100
98.16% |
98.2Value: 98.2
|
tvet components Rank 32 / Score 55.02 |
firms offering formal training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
35.1Worst: Timor-Leste 0 Best: China 100
35.1% |
35.1Value: 35.1
|
labour force with short-cycle tertiary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
69.3Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Latvia 100
69.3% |
69.3Value: 69.3
|
participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
62.4Worst: Viet Nam 0 Best: Paraguay 100
62.4% |
62.4Value: 62.4
|
government expenditure on vocational education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Netherlands 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
share of students enrolled in secondary vocational programmes  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
37.2Worst: Jamaica 0 Best: Bolivia 100
37.2% |
37.2Value: 37.2
|
share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Israel 0 Best: Australia 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
extent of staff training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
79 |
24.1 |
50.9Worst: Mauritania 24.1 Best: Switzerland 79
48.82% |
50.9Value: 50.9
|
quality of vocational training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
90.8 |
25.6 |
55.3Worst: Angola 25.6 Best: Switzerland 90.8
45.55% |
55.3Value: 55.3
|
ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
20.6Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Botswana 100
20.6% |
20.6Value: 20.6
|
ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
36.7Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Malawi 100
36.7% |
36.7Value: 36.7
|
tvet labour market Rank 32 / Score 70.32 |
firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
80.7Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: South Africa 100
80.7% |
80.7Value: 80.7
|
employment educational mismatch (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
76.6Worst: Burkina Faso 0 Best: Romania 100
76.6% |
76.6Value: 76.6
|
proportion of skilled production workers  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
61.5Worst: Mauritania 0 Best: South Africa 100
61.5% |
61.5Value: 61.5
|
unemployment rate with vocational education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
63.8Worst: Cape Verde 0 Best: Qatar 100
63.8% |
63.8Value: 63.8
|
share of tvet occupations  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
66.1Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Qatar 100
66.1% |
66.1Value: 66.1
|
manufacturing employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
59.4Worst: Chad 0 Best: Lesotho 100
59.4% |
59.4Value: 59.4
|
enrolment in vocational education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.9 |
5.6 |
67.7Worst: Yemen 5.6 Best: Brunei Darussalam 99.9
65.85% |
67.7Value: 67.7
|
vulnerable employment rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
87.4Worst: Niger 0 Best: Qatar 100
87.4% |
87.4Value: 87.4
|
inputs (higher education) Rank 11 / Score 60.88 |
government expenditure per tertiary student  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
28.1Worst: St. Lucia 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
28.1% |
28.1Value: 28.1
|
teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
70.1Worst: Kenya 0 Best: Indonesia 100
70.1% |
70.1Value: 70.1
|
enrolment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
29Worst: Niger 0 Best: Greece 100
29% |
29Value: 29
|
enrolment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
88.2Worst: Burundi 0 Best: France 100
88.2% |
88.2Value: 88.2
|
pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
87.9Worst: Sudan 0 Best: Lebanon 100
87.9% |
87.9Value: 87.9
|
researchers in higher education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
62Worst: Mali 0 Best: Senegal 100
62% |
62Value: 62
|
learning environment Rank 20 / Score 70.63 |
teachers in tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.3 |
0 |
82.2Worst: Myanmar 0 Best: Panama 99.3
82.78% |
82.2Value: 82.2
|
inbound mobility rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
34.2Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Australia 100
34.2% |
34.2Value: 34.2
|
academic freedom  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.2 |
4.1 |
95.5Worst: Bahrain 4.1 Best: Uruguay 97.2
98.17% |
95.5Value: 95.5
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.2 |
31.8 |
NAWorst: Niger 31.8 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 99.2
|
NAValue: NA
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
1 |
NAWorst: Mozambique 1 Best: Barbados 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
46 |
0 |
NAWorst: Angola 0 Best: State of Palestine 46
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
outputs (higher education) Rank 38 / Score 58.97 |
educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
58.1Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Lithuania 100
58.1% |
58.1Value: 58.1
|
educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
61.4Worst: Guatemala 0 Best: Georgia 100
61.4% |
61.4Value: 61.4
|
educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
36.5Worst: Dominican Republic 0 Best: Slovenia 100
36.5% |
36.5Value: 36.5
|
labour force participation rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
81.9Worst: Venezuela 0 Best: Tanzania 100
81.9% |
81.9Value: 81.9
|
unemployment rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
84.1Worst: Trinidad and Tobago 0 Best: Myanmar 100
84.1% |
84.1Value: 84.1
|
university-industry collaboration in r&d  |
Initial Value: 1
|
78.5 |
16 |
53.6Worst: Angola 16 Best: Israel 78.5
60.16% |
53.6Value: 53.6
|
citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
30.2Worst: Chad 0 Best: Cyprus 100
30.2% |
30.2Value: 30.2
|
inputs (research, development and innovation) Rank 38 / Score 36.71 |
gerd (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
27.1Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Israel 100
27.1% |
27.1Value: 27.1
|
gerd per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
16.5Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Botswana 100
16.5% |
16.5Value: 16.5
|
researchers per thousand labour force  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
57.1Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Denmark 100
57.1% |
57.1Value: 57.1
|
tertiary graduates from stem programmes (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
51.7Worst: Eswatini 0 Best: Gambia 100
51.7% |
51.7Value: 51.7
|
gerd performed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
18.8Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
18.8% |
18.8Value: 18.8
|
gerd financed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
57.5Worst: Brunei Darussalam 0 Best: Thailand 100
57.5% |
57.5Value: 57.5
|
researchers in business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
41.4Worst: Mozambique 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
41.4% |
41.4Value: 41.4
|
firms that spend on r&d (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
6.5Worst: Lesotho 0 Best: Finland 100
6.5% |
6.5Value: 6.5
|
high-skilled employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Mali 0 Best: United States 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
intellectual property payments (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
24.6Worst: Armenia 0 Best: Ireland 100
24.6% |
24.6Value: 24.6
|
state of cluster development  |
Initial Value: 1
|
74.9 |
23.5 |
54.6Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 23.5 Best: Italy 74.9
60.51% |
54.6Value: 54.6
|
outputs (research, development and innovation) Rank 39 / Score 43.28 |
average documents per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
59.1Worst: Uzbekistan 0 Best: Panama 100
59.1% |
59.1Value: 59.1
|
citations per document  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
24.6Worst: Indonesia 0 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100
24.6% |
24.6Value: 24.6
|
patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
63.4Worst: Tanzania 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
63.4% |
63.4Value: 63.4
|
intellectual property receipts (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
15.4Worst: Angola 0 Best: Netherlands 100
15.4% |
15.4Value: 15.4
|
industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
45Worst: Dominican Republic 0 Best: China 100
45% |
45Value: 45
|
pct applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
71.8Worst: Pakistan 0 Best: Barbados 100
71.8% |
71.8Value: 71.8
|
firms producing new goods and services (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
17.6Worst: Egypt 0 Best: Finland 100
17.6% |
17.6Value: 17.6
|
trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
73.2Worst: Chad 0 Best: China 100
73.2% |
73.2Value: 73.2
|
cultural goods exports (% exports)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
13.4Worst: Algeria 0 Best: St. Lucia 100
13.4% |
13.4Value: 13.4
|
printing and publishing output (% manufactured output)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
26.2Worst: Lao PDR 0 Best: Kenya 100
26.2% |
26.2Value: 26.2
|
impact Rank 51 / Score 34.94 |
research institutions prominence  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
35.6Worst: Albania 0 Best: China 100
35.6% |
35.6Value: 35.6
|
growth of innovative companies  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
58.4Worst: Sierra Leone 0 Best: Belarus 100
58.4% |
58.4Value: 58.4
|
iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.8 |
0.4 |
56.4Worst: Jamaica 0.4 Best: Israel 80.8
69.65% |
56.4Value: 56.4
|
iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
23Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Bulgaria 100
23% |
23Value: 23
|
gerd financed from abroad (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
13.9Worst: Algeria 0 Best: Israel 100
13.9% |
13.9Value: 13.9
|
joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
9.6Worst: Cape Verde 0 Best: Israel 100
9.6% |
9.6Value: 9.6
|
computer software spending (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
48.1Worst: Ethiopia 0 Best: United States 100
48.1% |
48.1Value: 48.1
|
new business density per thousand population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
32.2Worst: Liberia 0 Best: Botswana 100
32.2% |
32.2Value: 32.2
|
firms with new product/service (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
43Worst: St. Lucia 0 Best: Lesotho 100
43% |
43Value: 43
|
infrastructure Rank 36 / Score 62.47 |
3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
99.9Worst: Niger 0 Best: Armenia 100
99.9% |
99.9Value: 99.9
|
secure internet servers per 1 million population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
28.1Worst: Chad 0 Best: Denmark 100
28.1% |
28.1Value: 28.1
|
investment in telecommunication services (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
19.9Worst: Mauritania 0 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100
19.9% |
19.9Value: 19.9
|
mobile upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
35.4Worst: Niger 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
35.4% |
35.4Value: 35.4
|
fixed-broadband upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
37.6Worst: Algeria 0 Best: Singapore 100
37.6% |
37.6Value: 37.6
|
fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
89Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Switzerland 100
89% |
89Value: 89
|
fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
83.1Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Kuwait 100
83.1% |
83.1Value: 83.1
|
mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
69.2Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
69.2% |
69.2Value: 69.2
|
internet and telephony competition  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Albania 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
access Rank 50 / Score 47.62 |
active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
34.4Worst: Chad 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
34.4% |
34.4Value: 34.4
|
international internet bandwidth per user  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
46.4Worst: Ethiopia 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
46.4% |
46.4Value: 46.4
|
households with internet access at home (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
84.6Worst: Burundi 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
84.6% |
84.6Value: 84.6
|
individuals with standard ict skills (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
53.2Worst: Togo 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
53.2% |
53.2Value: 53.2
|
tertiary graduates from ict programmes (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
16.4Worst: Eswatini 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
16.4% |
16.4Value: 16.4
|
ict employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
50.7Worst: Chad 0 Best: Israel 100
50.7% |
50.7Value: 50.7
|
usage Rank 39 / Score 56.99 |
government online services  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
83.5Worst: State of Palestine 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
83.5% |
83.5Value: 83.5
|
fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
30Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Kuwait 100
30% |
30Value: 30
|
mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
13.1Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Kuwait 100
13.1% |
13.1Value: 13.1
|
internet users (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
77.1Worst: Burundi 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
77.1% |
77.1Value: 77.1
|
ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
58.7Worst: Indonesia 0 Best: Barbados 100
58.7% |
58.7Value: 58.7
|
e-participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
82.1Worst: State of Palestine 0 Best: Estonia 100
82.1% |
82.1Value: 82.1
|
internet activities by individuals (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
71Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Denmark 100
71% |
71Value: 71
|
trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
40.4Worst: Lao PDR 0 Best: Ireland 100
40.4% |
40.4Value: 40.4
|
economic competitiveness Rank 45 / Score 60.59 |
gross fixed capital formation (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
40.2Worst: Iraq 0 Best: Tanzania 100
40.2% |
40.2Value: 40.2
|
logistics performance  |
Initial Value: 1
|
80 |
23.7 |
66.1Worst: Afghanistan 23.7 Best: Germany 80
75.31% |
66.1Value: 66.1
|
transport productive capacity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
23.3Worst: Mauritania 0 Best: Belize 100
23.3% |
23.3Value: 23.3
|
building quality control  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
13.3 |
73.3Worst: Liberia 13.3 Best: China 100
69.2% |
73.3Value: 73.3
|
ease of starting a business  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
52.4 |
90.9Worst: Cambodia 52.4 Best: New Zealand 100
80.88% |
90.9Value: 90.9
|
insolvency recovery rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
70.4Worst: Chad 0 Best: Japan 100
70.4% |
70.4Value: 70.4
|
entrepreneurial employee activity rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
34.8Worst: China 0 Best: Denmark 100
34.8% |
34.8Value: 34.8
|
extent of corporate transparency  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
85.7Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Australia 100
85.7% |
85.7Value: 85.7
|
economic openness Rank 32 / Score 69.84 |
trade (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
30.4Worst: Sudan 0 Best: Ireland 100
30.4% |
30.4Value: 30.4
|
high-technology trade (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
52.4Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
52.4% |
52.4Value: 52.4
|
product concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.2 |
10.9 |
92.8Worst: Chad 10.9 Best: Croatia 94.2
98.32% |
92.8Value: 92.8
|
market concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.9 |
45.7 |
91.8Worst: Bhutan 45.7 Best: Ukraine 96.9
90.04% |
91.8Value: 91.8
|
chinn-ito financial openness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Angola 0 Best: Australia 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
48.5Worst: Angola 0 Best: Cyprus 100
48.5% |
48.5Value: 48.5
|
debt dynamics  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
70Worst: Mozambique 0 Best: Australia 100
70% |
70Value: 70
|
financing and domestic value added Rank 53 / Score 54.8 |
domestic credit to private sector (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
38Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
38% |
38Value: 38
|
msme financing gap (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Philippines 0 Best: North Macedonia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
tax and contribution rate (% profit)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
67.7Worst: Argentina 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
67.7% |
67.7Value: 67.7
|
bank non-performing loans (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
80Worst: Angola 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
80% |
80Value: 80
|
medium- and high-tech activities value added  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
29.8Worst: Cambodia 0 Best: Singapore 100
29.8% |
29.8Value: 29.8
|
industry and services value added (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
63.9Worst: Sierra Leone 0 Best: Kuwait 100
63.9% |
63.9Value: 63.9
|
labour underutilization rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
67.6Worst: Benin 0 Best: Thailand 100
67.6% |
67.6Value: 67.6
|
output per worker  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
29.5Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
29.5% |
29.5Value: 29.5
|
governance Rank 17 / Score 84.48 |
peace and stability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.6 |
0.5 |
85.8Worst: Afghanistan 0.5 Best: New Zealand 97.6
87.85% |
85.8Value: 85.8
|
voice and accountability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
3.4 |
89.9Worst: Lao PDR 3.4 Best: Norway 100
89.54% |
89.9Value: 89.9
|
rule of law  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
85.1Worst: Venezuela 0 Best: Finland 100
85.1% |
85.1Value: 85.1
|
control of corruption  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
1.9 |
76.9Worst: Yemen 1.9 Best: Denmark 100
76.45% |
76.9Value: 76.9
|
government effectiveness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0.5 |
81.3Worst: Yemen 0.5 Best: Singapore 100
81.21% |
81.3Value: 81.3
|
socio-economic Rank 18 / Score 75.23 |
female-to-male ratio in parliament  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
66.7Worst: Yemen 0 Best: Mexico 100
66.7% |
66.7Value: 66.7
|
female-to-male labour force participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
83.5Worst: Yemen 0 Best: Burundi 100
83.5% |
83.5Value: 83.5
|
female-to-male ratio in internet usage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
52.1 |
96.4Worst: Burundi 52.1 Best: Armenia 100
92.48% |
96.4Value: 96.4
|
social protection coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
89.9Worst: Uganda 0 Best: Australia 100
89.9% |
89.9Value: 89.9
|
adult literacy rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
95Worst: Chad 0 Best: Ukraine 100
95% |
95Value: 95
|
youth not in employment, education or training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
88.1Worst: Iraq 0 Best: Japan 100
88.1% |
88.1Value: 88.1
|
poverty headcount ratio (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
76.3Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: China 100
76.3% |
76.3Value: 76.3
|
gdp per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
28.7Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
28.7% |
28.7Value: 28.7
|
health and environment Rank 11 / Score 72.42 |
universal health coverage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
87 |
28 |
82Worst: Chad 28 Best: Australia 87
91.53% |
82Value: 82
|
healthy life expectancy (years)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
89.5Worst: Lesotho 0 Best: Japan 100
89.5% |
89.5Value: 89.5
|
under-five mortality rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
98.5Worst: Nigeria 0 Best: Iceland 100
98.5% |
98.5Value: 98.5
|
renewable energy consumption (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
28.6Worst: Bahrain 0 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100
28.6% |
28.6Value: 28.6
|
ecological footprint per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
68.9Worst: Luxembourg 0 Best: Yemen 100
68.9% |
68.9Value: 68.9
|
natural hazard exposure  |
Initial Value: 1
|
95 |
16 |
67Worst: Philippines 16 Best: Finland 95
64.56% |
67Value: 67
|