KPI |
2021 - Portugal |
Weight |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value |
Current Value |
knowledge capital
Rank 20 / Score 84.55 |
net enrollment rate in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: France 100.00
98.9% |
98.9Value: 98.9
|
net enrollment rate in lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
99.8% |
99.8Value: 99.8
|
net enrollment rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Azerbaijan 100.00
99.9% |
99.9Value: 99.9
|
years of compulsory education in primary and secondary |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Germany 100.00
92.3% |
92.3Value: 92.3
|
completion rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Kazakhstan 100.00
67.3% |
67.3Value: 67.3
|
gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
77.3% |
77.3Value: 77.3
|
assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: China 100.00
64.5% |
64.5Value: 64.5
|
learning-adjusted years of schooling |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Liberia 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
85.8% |
85.8Value: 85.8
|
educational enabling environment
Rank 32 / Score 73.15 |
government expenditure on primary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Timor-Leste 100.00
32% |
32Value: 32
|
government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
41.2% |
41.2Value: 41.2
|
government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Croatia 100.00
56% |
56Value: 56
|
government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Guatemala 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
47.1% |
47.1Value: 47.1
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Malawi 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
schools with access to computers in primary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
schools with access to computers in secondary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
gross enrollment ratio in early childhood education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Yemen 0.00 Best: Liberia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
proportion of children who are developmentally on track |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
30.20 |
Worst: Niger 30.20 Best: Czech Republic 100.00
69.91% |
79Value: 79
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Iceland 100.00
48.9% |
48.9Value: 48.9
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
2.40 |
Worst: Niger 2.40 Best: Austria 100.00
98.16% |
98.2Value: 98.2
|
tvet components
Rank 32 / Score 55.02 |
firms offering formal training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Timor-Leste 0.00 Best: China 100.00
35.1% |
35.1Value: 35.1
|
Labor force with short-cycle tertiary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Latvia 100.00
69.3% |
69.3Value: 69.3
|
participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Viet Nam 0.00 Best: Paraguay 100.00
62.4% |
62.4Value: 62.4
|
government expenditure on vocational education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
Share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programs |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Jamaica 0.00 Best: Bolivia 100.00
37.2% |
37.2Value: 37.2
|
share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Israel 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
extent of staff training |
Initial Value: 1
|
79.00 |
24.10 |
Worst: Mauritania 24.10 Best: Switzerland 79.00
48.82% |
50.9Value: 50.9
|
quality of vocational training |
Initial Value: 1
|
90.80 |
25.60 |
Worst: Angola 25.60 Best: Switzerland 90.80
45.55% |
55.3Value: 55.3
|
ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Botswana 100.00
20.6% |
20.6Value: 20.6
|
ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Malawi 100.00
36.7% |
36.7Value: 36.7
|
tvet labor market
Rank 32 / Score 70.32 |
firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
80.7% |
80.7Value: 80.7
|
employment educational mismatch (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0.00 Best: Romania 100.00
76.6% |
76.6Value: 76.6
|
proportion of skilled production workers |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
61.5% |
61.5Value: 61.5
|
unemployment rate with vocational education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
63.8% |
63.8Value: 63.8
|
share of tvet occupations |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
66.1% |
66.1Value: 66.1
|
manufacturing employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
59.4% |
59.4Value: 59.4
|
enrollment in vocational education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.90 |
5.60 |
Worst: Yemen 5.60 Best: Brunei Darussalam 99.90
65.85% |
67.7Value: 67.7
|
vulnerable employment rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
87.4% |
87.4Value: 87.4
|
inputs (higher education)
Rank 11 / Score 60.88 |
government expenditure per tertiary student |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: St. Lucia 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
28.1% |
28.1Value: 28.1
|
teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kenya 0.00 Best: Indonesia 100.00
70.1% |
70.1Value: 70.1
|
enrollment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Greece 100.00
29% |
29Value: 29
|
enrollment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: France 100.00
88.2% |
88.2Value: 88.2
|
pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Sudan 0.00 Best: Lebanon 100.00
87.9% |
87.9Value: 87.9
|
researchers in higher education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Senegal 100.00
62% |
62Value: 62
|
learning environment
Rank 20 / Score 70.63 |
teachers in tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.30 |
0.00 |
Worst: Myanmar 0.00 Best: Panama 99.30
82.78% |
82.2Value: 82.2
|
inbound mobility rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
34.2% |
34.2Value: 34.2
|
academic freedom |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.20 |
4.10 |
Worst: Bahrain 4.10 Best: Uruguay 97.20
98.17% |
95.5Value: 95.5
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.20 |
31.80 |
Worst: Niger 31.80 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 99.20
|
NAValue: NA
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
1.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 1.00 Best: Barbados 100.00
|
NAValue: NA
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
46.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: State of Palestine 46.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
outputs (higher education)
Rank 38 / Score 58.97 |
Educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Lithuania 100.00
58.1% |
58.1Value: 58.1
|
educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Guatemala 0.00 Best: Georgia 100.00
61.4% |
61.4Value: 61.4
|
educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: Slovenia 100.00
36.5% |
36.5Value: 36.5
|
Labor force participation rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Venezuela 0.00 Best: Tanzania 100.00
81.9% |
81.9Value: 81.9
|
unemployment rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Trinidad and Tobago 0.00 Best: Myanmar 100.00
84.1% |
84.1Value: 84.1
|
university-industry collaboration in r&d |
Initial Value: 1
|
78.50 |
16.00 |
Worst: Angola 16.00 Best: Israel 78.50
60.16% |
53.6Value: 53.6
|
citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
30.2% |
30.2Value: 30.2
|
inputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 38 / Score 36.71 |
gerd (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
27.1% |
27.1Value: 27.1
|
gerd per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Botswana 100.00
16.5% |
16.5Value: 16.5
|
researchers per thousand labor force |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
57.1% |
57.1Value: 57.1
|
tertiary graduates from stem programs (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Gambia 100.00
51.7% |
51.7Value: 51.7
|
gerd performed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
18.8% |
18.8Value: 18.8
|
gerd financed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Brunei Darussalam 0.00 Best: Thailand 100.00
57.5% |
57.5Value: 57.5
|
researchers in business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
41.4% |
41.4Value: 41.4
|
firms that spend on r&d (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
6.5% |
6.5Value: 6.5
|
high-skilled employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
intellectual property payments (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Armenia 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
24.6% |
24.6Value: 24.6
|
state of cluster development |
Initial Value: 1
|
74.90 |
23.50 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 23.50 Best: Italy 74.90
60.51% |
54.6Value: 54.6
|
outputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 39 / Score 43.28 |
average documents per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0.00 Best: Panama 100.00
59.1% |
59.1Value: 59.1
|
citations per document |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Indonesia 0.00 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100.00
24.6% |
24.6Value: 24.6
|
patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
63.4% |
63.4Value: 63.4
|
intellectual property receipts (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
15.4% |
15.4Value: 15.4
|
industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: China 100.00
45% |
45Value: 45
|
pct applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Pakistan 0.00 Best: Barbados 100.00
71.8% |
71.8Value: 71.8
|
firms producing new goods and services (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Egypt 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
17.6% |
17.6Value: 17.6
|
trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: China 100.00
73.2% |
73.2Value: 73.2
|
cultural goods exports (% exports) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Algeria 0.00 Best: St. Lucia 100.00
13.4% |
13.4Value: 13.4
|
printing and publishing output (% manufactured output) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Myanmar 100.00
26.2% |
26.2Value: 26.2
|
impact
Rank 51 / Score 34.94 |
research institutions prominence |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Albania 0.00 Best: China 100.00
35.6% |
35.6Value: 35.6
|
growth of innovative companies |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Sierra Leone 0.00 Best: Belarus 100.00
58.4% |
58.4Value: 58.4
|
iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.80 |
0.40 |
Worst: Jamaica 0.40 Best: Israel 80.80
69.65% |
56.4Value: 56.4
|
iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Bulgaria 100.00
23% |
23Value: 23
|
gerd financed from abroad (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Algeria 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
13.9% |
13.9Value: 13.9
|
joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
9.6% |
9.6Value: 9.6
|
computer software spending (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
48.1% |
48.1Value: 48.1
|
new business density per thousand population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Liberia 0.00 Best: Botswana 100.00
32.2% |
32.2Value: 32.2
|
firms with new product/service (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: St. Lucia 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
43% |
43Value: 43
|
infrastructure
Rank 36 / Score 62.47 |
3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
99.9% |
99.9Value: 99.9
|
secure internet servers per 1 million population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
28.1% |
28.1Value: 28.1
|
investment in telecommunication services (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100.00
19.9% |
19.9Value: 19.9
|
mobile upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
35.4% |
35.4Value: 35.4
|
fixed-broadband upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Algeria 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
37.6% |
37.6Value: 37.6
|
fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Switzerland 100.00
89% |
89Value: 89
|
fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
83.1% |
83.1Value: 83.1
|
mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
69.2% |
69.2Value: 69.2
|
internet and telephony competition |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
access
Rank 50 / Score 47.62 |
active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
34.4% |
34.4Value: 34.4
|
international internet bandwidth per user |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
46.4% |
46.4Value: 46.4
|
households with internet access at home (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
84.6% |
84.6Value: 84.6
|
individuals with standard ict skills (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Togo 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
53.2% |
53.2Value: 53.2
|
tertiary graduates from ict programs (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
16.4% |
16.4Value: 16.4
|
ict employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
50.7% |
50.7Value: 50.7
|
usage
Rank 39 / Score 56.99 |
government online services |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Hong Kong SAR 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
83.5% |
83.5Value: 83.5
|
fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
30% |
30Value: 30
|
mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
13.1% |
13.1Value: 13.1
|
internet users (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
77.1% |
77.1Value: 77.1
|
ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Indonesia 0.00 Best: Barbados 100.00
58.7% |
58.7Value: 58.7
|
e-participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Hong Kong SAR 0.00 Best: Estonia 100.00
82.1% |
82.1Value: 82.1
|
internet activities by individuals (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
71% |
71Value: 71
|
trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
40.4% |
40.4Value: 40.4
|
economic competitiveness
Rank 45 / Score 60.59 |
gross fixed capital formation (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Iraq 0.00 Best: Tanzania 100.00
40.2% |
40.2Value: 40.2
|
logistics performance |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.00 |
23.70 |
Worst: Afghanistan 23.70 Best: Germany 80.00
75.31% |
66.1Value: 66.1
|
transport productive capacity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: Belize 100.00
23.3% |
23.3Value: 23.3
|
building quality control |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
13.30 |
Worst: Liberia 13.30 Best: China 100.00
69.2% |
73.3Value: 73.3
|
ease of starting a business |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
52.40 |
Worst: Cambodia 52.40 Best: New Zealand 100.00
80.88% |
90.9Value: 90.9
|
insolvency recovery rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Japan 100.00
70.4% |
70.4Value: 70.4
|
entrepreneurial employee activity rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: China 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
34.8% |
34.8Value: 34.8
|
extent of corporate transparency |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
85.7% |
85.7Value: 85.7
|
economic openness
Rank 32 / Score 69.84 |
trade (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Sudan 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
30.4% |
30.4Value: 30.4
|
high-technology trade (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
52.4% |
52.4Value: 52.4
|
product concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.20 |
10.90 |
Worst: Chad 10.90 Best: Croatia 94.20
98.32% |
92.8Value: 92.8
|
market concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.90 |
45.70 |
Worst: Bhutan 45.70 Best: Ukraine 96.90
90.04% |
91.8Value: 91.8
|
chinn-ito financial openness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
48.5% |
48.5Value: 48.5
|
debt dynamics |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
70% |
70Value: 70
|
financing and domestic value added
Rank 53 / Score 54.8 |
domestic credit to private sector (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
38% |
38Value: 38
|
msme financing gap (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Philippines 0.00 Best: North Macedonia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
tax and contribution rate (% profit) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Argentina 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
67.7% |
67.7Value: 67.7
|
bank non-performing loans (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
80% |
80Value: 80
|
medium- and high-tech activities value added |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cambodia 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
29.8% |
29.8Value: 29.8
|
industry and services value added (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Sierra Leone 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
63.9% |
63.9Value: 63.9
|
labor underutilization rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Benin 0.00 Best: Thailand 100.00
67.6% |
67.6Value: 67.6
|
output per worker |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
29.5% |
29.5Value: 29.5
|
governance
Rank 17 / Score 84.48 |
peace and stability |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.60 |
0.50 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.50 Best: New Zealand 97.60
87.85% |
85.8Value: 85.8
|
voice and accountability |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
3.40 |
Worst: Lao PDR 3.40 Best: Norway 100.00
89.54% |
89.9Value: 89.9
|
rule of law |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Venezuela 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
85.1% |
85.1Value: 85.1
|
control of corruption |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
1.90 |
Worst: Yemen 1.90 Best: Denmark 100.00
76.45% |
76.9Value: 76.9
|
government effectiveness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.50 |
Worst: Yemen 0.50 Best: Singapore 100.00
81.21% |
81.3Value: 81.3
|
socio-economic
Rank 18 / Score 75.23 |
female-to-male ratio in parliament |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Yemen 0.00 Best: Mexico 100.00
66.7% |
66.7Value: 66.7
|
female-to-male labor force participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Yemen 0.00 Best: Burundi 100.00
83.5% |
83.5Value: 83.5
|
female-to-male ratio in internet usage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
52.10 |
Worst: Burundi 52.10 Best: Armenia 100.00
92.48% |
96.4Value: 96.4
|
social protection coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uganda 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
89.9% |
89.9Value: 89.9
|
adult literacy rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Ukraine 100.00
95% |
95Value: 95
|
youth not in employment, education or training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Iraq 0.00 Best: Japan 100.00
88.1% |
88.1Value: 88.1
|
poverty headcount ratio (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: China 100.00
76.3% |
76.3Value: 76.3
|
gdp per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
28.7% |
28.7Value: 28.7
|
health and environment
Rank 11 / Score 72.42 |
universal health coverage |
Initial Value: 1
|
87.00 |
28.00 |
Worst: Chad 28.00 Best: Australia 87.00
91.53% |
82Value: 82
|
healthy life expectancy (years) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Japan 100.00
89.5% |
89.5Value: 89.5
|
under-five mortality rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Nigeria 0.00 Best: Iceland 100.00
98.5% |
98.5Value: 98.5
|
renewable energy consumption (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bahrain 0.00 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100.00
28.6% |
28.6Value: 28.6
|
ecological footprint per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Luxembourg 0.00 Best: Yemen 100.00
68.9% |
68.9Value: 68.9
|
natural hazard exposure |
Initial Value: 1
|
95.00 |
16.00 |
Worst: Philippines 16.00 Best: Finland 95.00
64.56% |
67Value: 67
|