KPI   |
2021 |
| Weight |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value |
Moldova |
 knowledge capital
Rank 59 / Score 74.71 |
| net enrolment rate in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
97.6Worst: Mali 0
Best: France 100
97.6% |
97.6Value: 97.6
|
| net enrolment rate in lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
98.9Worst: Tanzania 0
Best: Israel 100
98.9% |
98.9Value: 98.9
|
| net enrolment rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
85.9Worst: Niger 0
Best: Azerbaijan 100
85.9% |
85.9Value: 85.9
|
| years of compulsory education in primary and secondary |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
84.6Worst: Bhutan 0
Best: Germany 100
84.6% |
84.6Value: 84.6
|
| completion rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
74.1Worst: Niger 0
Best: Kazakhstan 100
74.1% |
74.1Value: 74.1
|
| gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
90.1Worst: Chad 0
Best: Luxembourg 100
90.1% |
90.1Value: 90.1
|
| assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
36.8Worst: Dominican Republic 0
Best: China 100
36.8% |
36.8Value: 36.8
|
| learning-adjusted years of schooling |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
57.3Worst: Liberia 0
Best: Singapore 100
57.3% |
57.3Value: 57.3
|
educational enabling environment
Rank 46 / Score 69.06 |
| government expenditure on primary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
29.1Worst: Kazakhstan 0
Best: Timor-Leste 100
29.1% |
29.1Value: 29.1
|
| government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
38.6Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0
Best: Tunisia 100
38.6% |
38.6Value: 38.6
|
| government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
61.8Worst: Kazakhstan 0
Best: Croatia 100
61.8% |
61.8Value: 61.8
|
| government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
40.2Worst: Guatemala 0
Best: Tunisia 100
40.2% |
40.2Value: 40.2
|
| pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
89.3Worst: Chad 0
Best: Kuwait 100
89.3% |
89.3Value: 89.3
|
| pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
96.1Worst: Madagascar 0
Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
96.1% |
96.1Value: 96.1
|
| schools with access to computers in primary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
99.3Worst: Burundi 0
Best: Armenia 100
99.3% |
99.3Value: 99.3
|
| schools with access to computers in secondary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
99.8Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0
Best: Albania 100
99.8% |
99.8Value: 99.8
|
| gross enrolment ratio in early childhood education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
57.9Worst: Yemen 0
Best: Liberia 100
57.9% |
57.9Value: 57.9
|
| proportion of children who are developmentally on track |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
76.7Worst: Burundi 0
Best: Serbia 100
76.7% |
76.7Value: 76.7
|
| proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
91.9Worst: Gambia 0
Best: Serbia 100
91.9% |
91.9Value: 91.9
|
| pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
95.8Worst: Chad 0
Best: Armenia 100
95.8% |
95.8Value: 95.8
|
| completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
30.2 |
85.4Worst: Niger 30.2
Best: Czech Republic 100
79.08% |
85.4Value: 85.4
|
| completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
25.8Worst: Mozambique 0
Best: Iceland 100
25.8% |
25.8Value: 25.8
|
| completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
2.4 |
60.2Worst: Niger 2.4
Best: Austria 100
59.22% |
60.2Value: 60.2
|
tvet components
Rank 69 / Score 46.05 |
| firms offering formal training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
46.8Worst: Timor-Leste 0
Best: China 100
46.8% |
46.8Value: 46.8
|
| labour force with short-cycle tertiary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Bhutan 0
Best: Latvia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Viet Nam 0
Best: Paraguay 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| government expenditure on vocational education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
32Worst: Azerbaijan 0
Best: Netherlands 100
32% |
32Value: 32
|
| share of students enrolled in secondary vocational programmes |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
20.8Worst: Jamaica 0
Best: Bolivia 100
20.8% |
20.8Value: 20.8
|
| share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Israel 0
Best: Australia 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
| extent of staff training |
Initial Value: 1
|
79 |
24.1 |
42.8Worst: Mauritania 24.1
Best: Switzerland 79
34.06% |
42.8Value: 42.8
|
| quality of vocational training |
Initial Value: 1
|
90.8 |
25.6 |
41.6Worst: Angola 25.6
Best: Switzerland 90.8
24.54% |
41.6Value: 41.6
|
| ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
20.7Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0
Best: Botswana 100
20.7% |
20.7Value: 20.7
|
| ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
56.6Worst: Azerbaijan 0
Best: Malawi 100
56.6% |
56.6Value: 56.6
|
tvet labour market
Rank 61 / Score 62.82 |
| firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
37Worst: Afghanistan 0
Best: South Africa 100
37% |
37Value: 37
|
| employment educational mismatch (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
86Worst: Burkina Faso 0
Best: Romania 100
86% |
86Value: 86
|
| proportion of skilled production workers |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
47.6Worst: Mauritania 0
Best: South Africa 100
47.6% |
47.6Value: 47.6
|
| unemployment rate with vocational education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
89.6Worst: Cape Verde 0
Best: Qatar 100
89.6% |
89.6Value: 89.6
|
| share of tvet occupations |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
53.6Worst: Burundi 0
Best: Qatar 100
53.6% |
53.6Value: 53.6
|
| manufacturing employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
39.9Worst: Chad 0
Best: Lesotho 100
39.9% |
39.9Value: 39.9
|
| enrolment in vocational education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.9 |
5.6 |
85.8Worst: Yemen 5.6
Best: Brunei Darussalam 99.9
85.05% |
85.8Value: 85.8
|
| vulnerable employment rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
67.5Worst: Niger 0
Best: Qatar 100
67.5% |
67.5Value: 67.5
|
inputs (higher education)
Rank 105 / Score 32.13 |
| government expenditure per tertiary student |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
15Worst: St. Lucia 0
Best: Luxembourg 100
15% |
15Value: 15
|
| teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
43.5Worst: Kenya 0
Best: Indonesia 100
43.5% |
43.5Value: 43.5
|
| enrolment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
13.2Worst: Niger 0
Best: Greece 100
13.2% |
13.2Value: 13.2
|
| enrolment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
21Worst: Burundi 0
Best: France 100
21% |
21Value: 21
|
| pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
80.5Worst: Sudan 0
Best: Lebanon 100
80.5% |
80.5Value: 80.5
|
| researchers in higher education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
19.6Worst: Mali 0
Best: Senegal 100
19.6% |
19.6Value: 19.6
|
learning environment
Rank 75 / Score 50.75 |
| teachers in tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.3 |
0 |
64.9Worst: Myanmar 0
Best: Panama 99.3
65.36% |
64.9Value: 64.9
|
| inbound mobility rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
23.4Worst: Afghanistan 0
Best: Australia 100
23.4% |
23.4Value: 23.4
|
| academic freedom |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.2 |
4.1 |
86.5Worst: Bahrain 4.1
Best: Uruguay 97.2
88.51% |
86.5Value: 86.5
|
| gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.2 |
31.8 |
76.7Worst: Niger 31.8
Best: Kyrgyz Republic 99.2
66.62% |
76.7Value: 76.7
|
| gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
1 |
48.6Worst: Mozambique 1
Best: Barbados 100
48.08% |
48.6Value: 48.6
|
| gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
46 |
0 |
4.4Worst: Angola 0
Best: State of Palestine 46
9.57% |
4.4Value: 4.4
|
outputs (higher education)
Rank 107 / Score 41.27 |
| educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
51.5Worst: Burundi 0
Best: Lithuania 100
51.5% |
51.5Value: 51.5
|
| educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
5.5Worst: Guatemala 0
Best: Georgia 100
5.5% |
5.5Value: 5.5
|
| educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
8Worst: Dominican Republic 0
Best: Slovenia 100
8% |
8Value: 8
|
| labour force participation rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
53.7Worst: Venezuela 0
Best: Tanzania 100
53.7% |
53.7Value: 53.7
|
| unemployment rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
95.2Worst: Trinidad and Tobago 0
Best: Myanmar 100
95.2% |
95.2Value: 95.2
|
| university-industry collaboration in r&d |
Initial Value: 1
|
78.5 |
16 |
28.7Worst: Angola 16
Best: Israel 78.5
20.32% |
28.7Value: 28.7
|
| citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
26.7Worst: Chad 0
Best: Cyprus 100
26.7% |
26.7Value: 26.7
|
inputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 112 / Score 20.66 |
| gerd (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
4.9Worst: Madagascar 0
Best: Israel 100
4.9% |
4.9Value: 4.9
|
| gerd per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
4.2Worst: Madagascar 0
Best: Botswana 100
4.2% |
4.2Value: 4.2
|
| researchers per thousand labour force |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
12.1Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0
Best: Denmark 100
12.1% |
12.1Value: 12.1
|
| tertiary graduates from stem programmes (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
47Worst: Eswatini 0
Best: Gambia 100
47% |
47Value: 47
|
| gerd performed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
1.2Worst: Azerbaijan 0
Best: Korea, Rep. 100
1.2% |
1.2Value: 1.2
|
| gerd financed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
19.2Worst: Brunei Darussalam 0
Best: Thailand 100
19.2% |
19.2Value: 19.2
|
| researchers in business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
7.2Worst: Mozambique 0
Best: Korea, Rep. 100
7.2% |
7.2Value: 7.2
|
| firms that spend on r&d (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
20.2Worst: Lesotho 0
Best: Finland 100
20.2% |
20.2Value: 20.2
|
| high-skilled employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
69.3Worst: Mali 0
Best: United States 100
69.3% |
69.3Value: 69.3
|
| intellectual property payments (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
14.4Worst: Armenia 0
Best: Ireland 100
14.4% |
14.4Value: 14.4
|
| state of cluster development |
Initial Value: 1
|
74.9 |
23.5 |
26.1Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 23.5
Best: Italy 74.9
5.06% |
26.1Value: 26.1
|
outputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 17 / Score 51.85 |
| average documents per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
34.8Worst: Uzbekistan 0
Best: Panama 100
34.8% |
34.8Value: 34.8
|
| citations per document |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Indonesia 0
Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
| patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
62.5Worst: Tanzania 0
Best: Korea, Rep. 100
62.5% |
62.5Value: 62.5
|
| intellectual property receipts (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
7.6Worst: Angola 0
Best: Netherlands 100
7.6% |
7.6Value: 7.6
|
| industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
51.3Worst: Dominican Republic 0
Best: China 100
51.3% |
51.3Value: 51.3
|
| pct applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
54.7Worst: Pakistan 0
Best: Barbados 100
54.7% |
54.7Value: 54.7
|
| firms producing new goods and services (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
46.6Worst: Egypt 0
Best: Finland 100
46.6% |
46.6Value: 46.6
|
| trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
86.8Worst: Chad 0
Best: China 100
86.8% |
86.8Value: 86.8
|
| cultural goods exports (% exports) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
4.3Worst: Algeria 0
Best: St. Lucia 100
4.3% |
4.3Value: 4.3
|
| printing and publishing output (% manufactured output) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
16.4Worst: Lao PDR 0
Best: Kenya 100
16.4% |
16.4Value: 16.4
|
impact
Rank 119 / Score 20.13 |
| research institutions prominence |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
6.8Worst: Albania 0
Best: China 100
6.8% |
6.8Value: 6.8
|
| growth of innovative companies |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
10.8Worst: Sierra Leone 0
Best: Belarus 100
10.8% |
10.8Value: 10.8
|
| iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.8 |
0.4 |
38.7Worst: Jamaica 0.4
Best: Israel 80.8
47.64% |
38.7Value: 38.7
|
| iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
3.9Worst: Afghanistan 0
Best: Bulgaria 100
3.9% |
3.9Value: 3.9
|
| gerd financed from abroad (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
9.4Worst: Algeria 0
Best: Israel 100
9.4% |
9.4Value: 9.4
|
| joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
17.9Worst: Cape Verde 0
Best: Israel 100
17.9% |
17.9Value: 17.9
|
| computer software spending (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
8.4Worst: Ethiopia 0
Best: United States 100
8.4% |
8.4Value: 8.4
|
| new business density per thousand population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
9.2Worst: Liberia 0
Best: Botswana 100
9.2% |
9.2Value: 9.2
|
| firms with new product/service (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
57.7Worst: St. Lucia 0
Best: Lesotho 100
57.7% |
57.7Value: 57.7
|
infrastructure
Rank 45 / Score 58.41 |
| 3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
99.4Worst: Niger 0
Best: Armenia 100
99.4% |
99.4Value: 99.4
|
| secure internet servers per 1 million population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
14.1Worst: Chad 0
Best: Denmark 100
14.1% |
14.1Value: 14.1
|
| investment in telecommunication services (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
38.7Worst: Mauritania 0
Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100
38.7% |
38.7Value: 38.7
|
| mobile upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Niger 0
Best: United Arab Emirates 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| fixed-broadband upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Algeria 0
Best: Singapore 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
38.2Worst: Afghanistan 0
Best: Switzerland 100
38.2% |
38.2Value: 38.2
|
| fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
77.8Worst: Burundi 0
Best: Kuwait 100
77.8% |
77.8Value: 77.8
|
| mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
81.1Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0
Best: Luxembourg 100
81.1% |
81.1Value: 81.1
|
| internet and telephony competition |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Madagascar 0
Best: Albania 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
access
Rank 63 / Score 42.74 |
| active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
25.2Worst: Chad 0
Best: United Arab Emirates 100
25.2% |
25.2Value: 25.2
|
| international internet bandwidth per user |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
47.2Worst: Ethiopia 0
Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
47.2% |
47.2Value: 47.2
|
| households with internet access at home (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
64.6Worst: Burundi 0
Best: United Arab Emirates 100
64.6% |
64.6Value: 64.6
|
| individuals with standard ict skills (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Togo 0
Best: United Arab Emirates 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| tertiary graduates from ict programmes (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
40.8Worst: Eswatini 0
Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
40.8% |
40.8Value: 40.8
|
| ict employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
35.9Worst: Chad 0
Best: Israel 100
35.9% |
35.9Value: 35.9
|
usage
Rank 51 / Score 54.65 |
| government online services |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
75.3Worst: State of Palestine 0
Best: Korea, Rep. 100
75.3% |
75.3Value: 75.3
|
| fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Bhutan 0
Best: Kuwait 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
13.7Worst: Bhutan 0
Best: Kuwait 100
13.7% |
13.7Value: 13.7
|
| internet users (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
74.8Worst: Burundi 0
Best: United Arab Emirates 100
74.8% |
74.8Value: 74.8
|
| ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
58.8Worst: Indonesia 0
Best: Barbados 100
58.8% |
58.8Value: 58.8
|
| e-participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
76.2Worst: State of Palestine 0
Best: Estonia 100
76.2% |
76.2Value: 76.2
|
| internet activities by individuals (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Azerbaijan 0
Best: Denmark 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
29.1Worst: Lao PDR 0
Best: Ireland 100
29.1% |
29.1Value: 29.1
|
economic competitiveness
Rank 44 / Score 60.6 |
| gross fixed capital formation (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
56.9Worst: Iraq 0
Best: Tanzania 100
56.9% |
56.9Value: 56.9
|
| logistics performance |
Initial Value: 1
|
80 |
23.7 |
36.4Worst: Afghanistan 23.7
Best: Germany 80
22.56% |
36.4Value: 36.4
|
| transport productive capacity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
23.1Worst: Mauritania 0
Best: Belize 100
23.1% |
23.1Value: 23.1
|
| building quality control |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
13.3 |
80Worst: Liberia 13.3
Best: China 100
76.93% |
80Value: 80
|
| ease of starting a business |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
52.4 |
95.7Worst: Cambodia 52.4
Best: New Zealand 100
90.97% |
95.7Value: 95.7
|
| insolvency recovery rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
34.9Worst: Chad 0
Best: Japan 100
34.9% |
34.9Value: 34.9
|
| entrepreneurial employee activity rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: China 0
Best: Denmark 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| extent of corporate transparency |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
85.7Worst: Afghanistan 0
Best: Australia 100
85.7% |
85.7Value: 85.7
|
economic openness
Rank 107 / Score 48.35 |
| trade (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
31.1Worst: Sudan 0
Best: Ireland 100
31.1% |
31.1Value: 31.1
|
| high-technology trade (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
42.3Worst: Afghanistan 0
Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
42.3% |
42.3Value: 42.3
|
| product concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.2 |
10.9 |
80.6Worst: Chad 10.9
Best: Croatia 94.2
83.67% |
80.6Value: 80.6
|
| market concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.9 |
45.7 |
89.9Worst: Bhutan 45.7
Best: Ukraine 96.9
86.33% |
89.9Value: 89.9
|
| chinn-ito financial openness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
16.4Worst: Angola 0
Best: Australia 100
16.4% |
16.4Value: 16.4
|
| foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
41.7Worst: Angola 0
Best: Cyprus 100
41.7% |
41.7Value: 41.7
|
| debt dynamics |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
49.1Worst: Mozambique 0
Best: Australia 100
49.1% |
49.1Value: 49.1
|
financing and domestic value added
Rank 84 / Score 48.24 |
| domestic credit to private sector (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
9.7Worst: Afghanistan 0
Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
9.7% |
9.7Value: 9.7
|
| msme financing gap (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
74.5Worst: Philippines 0
Best: North Macedonia 100
74.5% |
74.5Value: 74.5
|
| tax and contribution rate (% profit) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
68.8Worst: Argentina 0
Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
68.8% |
68.8Value: 68.8
|
| bank non-performing loans (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
69Worst: Angola 0
Best: Korea, Rep. 100
69% |
69Value: 69
|
| medium- and high-tech activities value added |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
20.6Worst: Cambodia 0
Best: Singapore 100
20.6% |
20.6Value: 20.6
|
| industry and services value added (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
53.8Worst: Sierra Leone 0
Best: Kuwait 100
53.8% |
53.8Value: 53.8
|
| labour underutilization rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
79.5Worst: Benin 0
Best: Thailand 100
79.5% |
79.5Value: 79.5
|
| output per worker |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
10Worst: Burundi 0
Best: Luxembourg 100
10% |
10Value: 10
|
governance
Rank 99 / Score 36.54 |
| peace and stability |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.6 |
0.5 |
32.5Worst: Afghanistan 0.5
Best: New Zealand 97.6
32.96% |
32.5Value: 32.5
|
| voice and accountability |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
3.4 |
44.4Worst: Lao PDR 3.4
Best: Norway 100
42.44% |
44.4Value: 44.4
|
| rule of law |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
37.5Worst: Venezuela 0
Best: Finland 100
37.5% |
37.5Value: 37.5
|
| control of corruption |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
1.9 |
30.3Worst: Yemen 1.9
Best: Denmark 100
28.95% |
30.3Value: 30.3
|
| government effectiveness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0.5 |
36.1Worst: Yemen 0.5
Best: Singapore 100
35.78% |
36.1Value: 36.1
|
socio-economic
Rank 76 / Score 56.67 |
| female-to-male ratio in parliament |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
65.6Worst: Yemen 0
Best: Mexico 100
65.6% |
65.6Value: 65.6
|
| female-to-male labour force participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
83.2Worst: Yemen 0
Best: Burundi 100
83.2% |
83.2Value: 83.2
|
| female-to-male ratio in internet usage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
52.1 |
NAWorst: Burundi 52.1
Best: Armenia 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
| social protection coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
40.3Worst: Uganda 0
Best: Australia 100
40.3% |
40.3Value: 40.3
|
| adult literacy rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
99.2Worst: Chad 0
Best: Ukraine 100
99.2% |
99.2Value: 99.2
|
| youth not in employment, education or training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
37.5Worst: Iraq 0
Best: Japan 100
37.5% |
37.5Value: 37.5
|
| poverty headcount ratio (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
62.6Worst: Madagascar 0
Best: China 100
62.6% |
62.6Value: 62.6
|
| gdp per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
10.6Worst: Burundi 0
Best: Luxembourg 100
10.6% |
10.6Value: 10.6
|
health and environment
Rank 43 / Score 67.12 |
| universal health coverage |
Initial Value: 1
|
87 |
28 |
69Worst: Chad 28
Best: Australia 87
69.49% |
69Value: 69
|
| healthy life expectancy (years) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
68Worst: Lesotho 0
Best: Japan 100
68% |
68Value: 68
|
| under-five mortality rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
89.3Worst: Nigeria 0
Best: Iceland 100
89.3% |
89.3Value: 89.3
|
| renewable energy consumption (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
26.7Worst: Bahrain 0
Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100
26.7% |
26.7Value: 26.7
|
| ecological footprint per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
89.7Worst: Luxembourg 0
Best: Yemen 100
89.7% |
89.7Value: 89.7
|
| natural hazard exposure |
Initial Value: 1
|
95 |
16 |
60Worst: Philippines 16
Best: Finland 95
55.7% |
60Value: 60
|
ESCWA
Sign in / Register