KPI  |
2021 |
Weight  |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value  |
Rwanda |
knowledge capital
Rank 133 / Score 39.34 |
net enrollment rate in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mali 0 Best: France 100
80.7% |
80.7Value: 80.7
|
net enrollment rate in lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Tanzania 0 Best: Israel 100
94.8% |
94.8Value: 94.8
|
net enrollment rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Azerbaijan 100
42.3% |
42.3Value: 42.3
|
years of compulsory education in primary and secondary  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Germany 100
46.2% |
46.2Value: 46.2
|
completion rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Kazakhstan 100
14.5% |
14.5Value: 14.5
|
gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
27% |
27Value: 27
|
assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0 Best: China 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
learning-adjusted years of schooling  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Liberia 0 Best: Singapore 100
16.2% |
16.2Value: 16.2
|
educational enabling environment
Rank 126 / Score 40.46 |
government expenditure on primary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0 Best: Timor-Leste 100
24.2% |
24.2Value: 24.2
|
government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Tunisia 100
27.6% |
27.6Value: 27.6
|
government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0 Best: Croatia 100
9.6% |
9.6Value: 9.6
|
government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Guatemala 0 Best: Tunisia 100
34.3% |
34.3Value: 34.3
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Kuwait 100
41% |
41Value: 41
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
54% |
54Value: 54
|
schools with access to computers in primary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Armenia 100
83.4% |
83.4Value: 83.4
|
schools with access to computers in secondary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Albania 100
85.8% |
85.8Value: 85.8
|
gross enrollment ratio in early childhood education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Yemen 0 Best: Liberia 100
10.4% |
10.4Value: 10.4
|
proportion of children who are developmentally on track  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Serbia 100
54.3% |
54.3Value: 54.3
|
proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Gambia 0 Best: Serbia 100
35% |
35Value: 35
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Armenia 100
24.5% |
24.5Value: 24.5
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
30.2 |
Worst: Niger 30.2 Best: Czech Republic 100
77.65% |
84.4Value: 84.4
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mozambique 0 Best: Iceland 100
8.3% |
8.3Value: 8.3
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
2.4 |
Worst: Niger 2.4 Best: Austria 100
28.07% |
29.8Value: 29.8
|
tvet components
Rank 33 / Score 54.58 |
firms offering formal training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Timor-Leste 0 Best: China 100
44% |
44Value: 44
|
Labor force with short-cycle tertiary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Latvia 100
33.2% |
33.2Value: 33.2
|
participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Viet Nam 0 Best: Paraguay 100
3.2% |
3.2Value: 3.2
|
government expenditure on vocational education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Netherlands 100
67.3% |
67.3Value: 67.3
|
Share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programs  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Jamaica 0 Best: Bolivia 100
20.1% |
20.1Value: 20.1
|
share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Israel 0 Best: Australia 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
extent of staff training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
79 |
24.1 |
Worst: Mauritania 24.1 Best: Switzerland 79
42.62% |
47.5Value: 47.5
|
quality of vocational training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
90.8 |
25.6 |
Worst: Angola 25.6 Best: Switzerland 90.8
38.04% |
50.4Value: 50.4
|
ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Botswana 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Malawi 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
tvet labor market
Rank 124 / Score 44.48 |
firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: South Africa 100
92.2% |
92.2Value: 92.2
|
employment educational mismatch (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0 Best: Romania 100
67.6% |
67.6Value: 67.6
|
proportion of skilled production workers  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mauritania 0 Best: South Africa 100
67.5% |
67.5Value: 67.5
|
unemployment rate with vocational education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0 Best: Qatar 100
38.1% |
38.1Value: 38.1
|
share of tvet occupations  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Qatar 100
5.2% |
5.2Value: 5.2
|
manufacturing employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Lesotho 100
20% |
20Value: 20
|
enrollment in vocational education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.9 |
5.6 |
Worst: Yemen 5.6 Best: Brunei Darussalam 99.9
78.05% |
79.2Value: 79.2
|
vulnerable employment rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Qatar 100
29.8% |
29.8Value: 29.8
|
inputs (higher education)
Rank 121 / Score 27.6 |
government expenditure per tertiary student  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: St. Lucia 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
6.8% |
6.8Value: 6.8
|
teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Kenya 0 Best: Indonesia 100
58.6% |
58.6Value: 58.6
|
enrollment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Greece 100
2.6% |
2.6Value: 2.6
|
enrollment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: France 100
0.9% |
0.9Value: 0.9
|
pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Sudan 0 Best: Lebanon 100
61.7% |
61.7Value: 61.7
|
researchers in higher education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mali 0 Best: Senegal 100
35% |
35Value: 35
|
learning environment
Rank 152 / Score 20.18 |
teachers in tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.3 |
0 |
Worst: Myanmar 0 Best: Panama 99.3
26.89% |
26.7Value: 26.7
|
inbound mobility rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Australia 100
12.8% |
12.8Value: 12.8
|
academic freedom  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.2 |
4.1 |
Worst: Bahrain 4.1 Best: Uruguay 97.2
4.4% |
8.2Value: 8.2
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.2 |
31.8 |
Worst: Niger 31.8 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 99.2
45.4% |
62.4Value: 62.4
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
1 |
Worst: Mozambique 1 Best: Barbados 100
8.89% |
9.8Value: 9.8
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
46 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: State of Palestine 46
2.61% |
1.2Value: 1.2
|
outputs (higher education)
Rank 101 / Score 43.33 |
Educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Lithuania 100
8.7% |
8.7Value: 8.7
|
educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Guatemala 0 Best: Georgia 100
1% |
1Value: 1
|
educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0 Best: Slovenia 100
0.8% |
0.8Value: 0.8
|
Labor force participation rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Venezuela 0 Best: Tanzania 100
66% |
66Value: 66
|
unemployment rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Trinidad and Tobago 0 Best: Myanmar 100
48.9% |
48.9Value: 48.9
|
university-industry collaboration in r&d  |
Initial Value: 1
|
78.5 |
16 |
Worst: Angola 16 Best: Israel 78.5
35.36% |
38.1Value: 38.1
|
citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Cyprus 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
inputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 93 / Score 23.92 |
gerd (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Israel 100
12.9% |
12.9Value: 12.9
|
gerd per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Botswana 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
researchers per thousand labor force  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Denmark 100
0% |
0Value: 0
|
tertiary graduates from stem programs (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Eswatini 0 Best: Gambia 100
23.9% |
23.9Value: 23.9
|
gerd performed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
1.2% |
1.2Value: 1.2
|
gerd financed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Brunei Darussalam 0 Best: Thailand 100
0.8% |
0.8Value: 0.8
|
researchers in business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mozambique 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
6.5% |
6.5Value: 6.5
|
firms that spend on r&d (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Lesotho 0 Best: Finland 100
15.3% |
15.3Value: 15.3
|
high-skilled employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mali 0 Best: United States 100
16.1% |
16.1Value: 16.1
|
intellectual property payments (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Armenia 0 Best: Ireland 100
0.2% |
0.2Value: 0.2
|
state of cluster development  |
Initial Value: 1
|
74.9 |
23.5 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 23.5 Best: Italy 74.9
47.08% |
47.7Value: 47.7
|
outputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 99 / Score 29.41 |
average documents per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0 Best: Panama 100
90.6% |
90.6Value: 90.6
|
citations per document  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Indonesia 0 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100
17.1% |
17.1Value: 17.1
|
patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Tanzania 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
36.1% |
36.1Value: 36.1
|
intellectual property receipts (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: Netherlands 100
3.1% |
3.1Value: 3.1
|
industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0 Best: China 100
1.2% |
1.2Value: 1.2
|
pct applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Pakistan 0 Best: Barbados 100
39.8% |
39.8Value: 39.8
|
firms producing new goods and services (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Egypt 0 Best: Finland 100
18% |
18Value: 18
|
trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: China 100
9.4% |
9.4Value: 9.4
|
cultural goods exports (% exports)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Algeria 0 Best: St. Lucia 100
3.1% |
3.1Value: 3.1
|
printing and publishing output (% manufactured output)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0 Best: Kenya 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
impact
Rank 66 / Score 31.22 |
research institutions prominence  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Albania 0 Best: China 100
5% |
5Value: 5
|
growth of innovative companies  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Sierra Leone 0 Best: Belarus 100
1.3% |
1.3Value: 1.3
|
iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.8 |
0.4 |
Worst: Jamaica 0.4 Best: Israel 80.8
68.53% |
55.5Value: 55.5
|
iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Bulgaria 100
1.5% |
1.5Value: 1.5
|
gerd financed from abroad (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Algeria 0 Best: Israel 100
64.2% |
64.2Value: 64.2
|
joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0 Best: Israel 100
25.4% |
25.4Value: 25.4
|
computer software spending (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0 Best: United States 100
4% |
4Value: 4
|
new business density per thousand population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Liberia 0 Best: Botswana 100
7.4% |
7.4Value: 7.4
|
firms with new product/service (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: St. Lucia 0 Best: Lesotho 100
85.9% |
85.9Value: 85.9
|
infrastructure
Rank 116 / Score 35.11 |
3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Armenia 100
97.8% |
97.8Value: 97.8
|
secure internet servers per 1 million population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Denmark 100
1.5% |
1.5Value: 1.5
|
investment in telecommunication services (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mauritania 0 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100
38.7% |
38.7Value: 38.7
|
mobile upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
2.3% |
2.3Value: 2.3
|
fixed-broadband upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Algeria 0 Best: Singapore 100
7.2% |
7.2Value: 7.2
|
fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Switzerland 100
0.2% |
0.2Value: 0.2
|
fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Kuwait 100
38.5% |
38.5Value: 38.5
|
mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
29.8% |
29.8Value: 29.8
|
internet and telephony competition  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Albania 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
access
Rank 122 / Score 18.32 |
active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
18% |
18Value: 18
|
international internet bandwidth per user  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
22.4% |
22.4Value: 22.4
|
households with internet access at home (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
9.1% |
9.1Value: 9.1
|
individuals with standard ict skills (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Togo 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
tertiary graduates from ict programs (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Eswatini 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
38.6% |
38.6Value: 38.6
|
ict employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Israel 100
3.5% |
3.5Value: 3.5
|
usage
Rank 96 / Score 38.41 |
government online services  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: State of Palestine 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
61.8% |
61.8Value: 61.8
|
fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Kuwait 100
70.7% |
70.7Value: 70.7
|
mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Kuwait 100
3.3% |
3.3Value: 3.3
|
internet users (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
21.9% |
21.9Value: 21.9
|
ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Indonesia 0 Best: Barbados 100
44% |
44Value: 44
|
e-participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: State of Palestine 0 Best: Estonia 100
63.1% |
63.1Value: 63.1
|
internet activities by individuals (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Denmark 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0 Best: Ireland 100
5.1% |
5.1Value: 5.1
|
economic competitiveness
Rank 94 / Score 47 |
gross fixed capital formation (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Iraq 0 Best: Tanzania 100
55% |
55Value: 55
|
logistics performance  |
Initial Value: 1
|
80 |
23.7 |
Worst: Afghanistan 23.7 Best: Germany 80
45.65% |
49.4Value: 49.4
|
transport productive capacity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mauritania 0 Best: Belize 100
19.3% |
19.3Value: 19.3
|
building quality control  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
13.3 |
Worst: Liberia 13.3 Best: China 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
ease of starting a business  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
52.4 |
Worst: Cambodia 52.4 Best: New Zealand 100
85.71% |
93.2Value: 93.2
|
insolvency recovery rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Japan 100
21% |
21Value: 21
|
entrepreneurial employee activity rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: China 0 Best: Denmark 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
extent of corporate transparency  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Australia 100
0% |
0Value: 0
|
economic openness
Rank 86 / Score 52.16 |
trade (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Sudan 0 Best: Ireland 100
20.6% |
20.6Value: 20.6
|
high-technology trade (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
58.5% |
58.5Value: 58.5
|
product concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.2 |
10.9 |
Worst: Chad 10.9 Best: Croatia 94.2
53.66% |
55.6Value: 55.6
|
market concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.9 |
45.7 |
Worst: Bhutan 45.7 Best: Ukraine 96.9
32.23% |
62.2Value: 62.2
|
chinn-ito financial openness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: Australia 100
74.7% |
74.7Value: 74.7
|
foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: Cyprus 100
45.3% |
45.3Value: 45.3
|
debt dynamics  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mozambique 0 Best: Australia 100
45.3% |
45.3Value: 45.3
|
financing and domestic value added
Rank 131 / Score 37.22 |
domestic credit to private sector (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
8.4% |
8.4Value: 8.4
|
msme financing gap (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Philippines 0 Best: North Macedonia 100
70.5% |
70.5Value: 70.5
|
tax and contribution rate (% profit)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Argentina 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
74.4% |
74.4Value: 74.4
|
bank non-performing loans (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
82.1% |
82.1Value: 82.1
|
medium- and high-tech activities value added  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Cambodia 0 Best: Singapore 100
11.2% |
11.2Value: 11.2
|
industry and services value added (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Sierra Leone 0 Best: Kuwait 100
38.5% |
38.5Value: 38.5
|
labor underutilization rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Benin 0 Best: Thailand 100
11.6% |
11.6Value: 11.6
|
output per worker  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
1.1% |
1.1Value: 1.1
|
governance
Rank 69 / Score 48.3 |
peace and stability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.6 |
0.5 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.5 Best: New Zealand 97.6
49.02% |
48.1Value: 48.1
|
voice and accountability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
3.4 |
Worst: Lao PDR 3.4 Best: Norway 100
15.01% |
17.9Value: 17.9
|
rule of law  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Venezuela 0 Best: Finland 100
56.7% |
56.7Value: 56.7
|
control of corruption  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
1.9 |
Worst: Yemen 1.9 Best: Denmark 100
69.11% |
69.7Value: 69.7
|
government effectiveness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0.5 |
Worst: Yemen 0.5 Best: Singapore 100
64.22% |
64.4Value: 64.4
|
socio-economic
Rank 66 / Score 59.64 |
female-to-male ratio in parliament  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Yemen 0 Best: Mexico 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
female-to-male labor force participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Yemen 0 Best: Burundi 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
female-to-male ratio in internet usage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
52.1 |
Worst: Burundi 52.1 Best: Armenia 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
social protection coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Uganda 0 Best: Australia 100
6.3% |
6.3Value: 6.3
|
adult literacy rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Ukraine 100
65.5% |
65.5Value: 65.5
|
youth not in employment, education or training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Iraq 0 Best: Japan 100
93.6% |
93.6Value: 93.6
|
poverty headcount ratio (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: China 100
46.4% |
46.4Value: 46.4
|
gdp per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
1.2% |
1.2Value: 1.2
|
health and environment
Rank 10 / Score 72.63 |
universal health coverage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
87 |
28 |
Worst: Chad 28 Best: Australia 87
49.15% |
57Value: 57
|
healthy life expectancy (years)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Lesotho 0 Best: Japan 100
53.5% |
53.5Value: 53.5
|
under-five mortality rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Nigeria 0 Best: Iceland 100
71.9% |
71.9Value: 71.9
|
renewable energy consumption (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bahrain 0 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100
88.9% |
88.9Value: 88.9
|
ecological footprint per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Luxembourg 0 Best: Yemen 100
99.5% |
99.5Value: 99.5
|
natural hazard exposure  |
Initial Value: 1
|
95 |
16 |
Worst: Philippines 16 Best: Finland 95
62.03% |
65Value: 65
|