KPI   |
2021 |
| Weight |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value |
Rwanda |
 knowledge capital
Rank 133 / Score 39.34 |
| net enrolment rate in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
80.7Worst: Mali 0
Best: France 100
80.7% |
80.7Value: 80.7
|
| net enrolment rate in lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
94.8Worst: Tanzania 0
Best: Israel 100
94.8% |
94.8Value: 94.8
|
| net enrolment rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
42.3Worst: Niger 0
Best: Azerbaijan 100
42.3% |
42.3Value: 42.3
|
| years of compulsory education in primary and secondary |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
46.2Worst: Bhutan 0
Best: Germany 100
46.2% |
46.2Value: 46.2
|
| completion rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
14.5Worst: Niger 0
Best: Kazakhstan 100
14.5% |
14.5Value: 14.5
|
| gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
27Worst: Chad 0
Best: Luxembourg 100
27% |
27Value: 27
|
| assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Dominican Republic 0
Best: China 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| learning-adjusted years of schooling |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
16.2Worst: Liberia 0
Best: Singapore 100
16.2% |
16.2Value: 16.2
|
educational enabling environment
Rank 126 / Score 40.46 |
| government expenditure on primary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
24.2Worst: Kazakhstan 0
Best: Timor-Leste 100
24.2% |
24.2Value: 24.2
|
| government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
27.6Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0
Best: Tunisia 100
27.6% |
27.6Value: 27.6
|
| government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
9.6Worst: Kazakhstan 0
Best: Croatia 100
9.6% |
9.6Value: 9.6
|
| government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
34.3Worst: Guatemala 0
Best: Tunisia 100
34.3% |
34.3Value: 34.3
|
| pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
41Worst: Chad 0
Best: Kuwait 100
41% |
41Value: 41
|
| pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
54Worst: Madagascar 0
Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
54% |
54Value: 54
|
| schools with access to computers in primary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
83.4Worst: Burundi 0
Best: Armenia 100
83.4% |
83.4Value: 83.4
|
| schools with access to computers in secondary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
85.8Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0
Best: Albania 100
85.8% |
85.8Value: 85.8
|
| gross enrolment ratio in early childhood education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
10.4Worst: Yemen 0
Best: Liberia 100
10.4% |
10.4Value: 10.4
|
| proportion of children who are developmentally on track |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
54.3Worst: Burundi 0
Best: Serbia 100
54.3% |
54.3Value: 54.3
|
| proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
35Worst: Gambia 0
Best: Serbia 100
35% |
35Value: 35
|
| pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
24.5Worst: Chad 0
Best: Armenia 100
24.5% |
24.5Value: 24.5
|
| completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
30.2 |
84.4Worst: Niger 30.2
Best: Czech Republic 100
77.65% |
84.4Value: 84.4
|
| completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
8.3Worst: Mozambique 0
Best: Iceland 100
8.3% |
8.3Value: 8.3
|
| completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
2.4 |
29.8Worst: Niger 2.4
Best: Austria 100
28.07% |
29.8Value: 29.8
|
tvet components
Rank 33 / Score 54.58 |
| firms offering formal training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
44Worst: Timor-Leste 0
Best: China 100
44% |
44Value: 44
|
| labour force with short-cycle tertiary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
33.2Worst: Bhutan 0
Best: Latvia 100
33.2% |
33.2Value: 33.2
|
| participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
3.2Worst: Viet Nam 0
Best: Paraguay 100
3.2% |
3.2Value: 3.2
|
| government expenditure on vocational education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
67.3Worst: Azerbaijan 0
Best: Netherlands 100
67.3% |
67.3Value: 67.3
|
| share of students enrolled in secondary vocational programmes |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
20.1Worst: Jamaica 0
Best: Bolivia 100
20.1% |
20.1Value: 20.1
|
| share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Israel 0
Best: Australia 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
| extent of staff training |
Initial Value: 1
|
79 |
24.1 |
47.5Worst: Mauritania 24.1
Best: Switzerland 79
42.62% |
47.5Value: 47.5
|
| quality of vocational training |
Initial Value: 1
|
90.8 |
25.6 |
50.4Worst: Angola 25.6
Best: Switzerland 90.8
38.04% |
50.4Value: 50.4
|
| ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0
Best: Botswana 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
| ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Azerbaijan 0
Best: Malawi 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
tvet labour market
Rank 124 / Score 44.48 |
| firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
92.2Worst: Afghanistan 0
Best: South Africa 100
92.2% |
92.2Value: 92.2
|
| employment educational mismatch (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
67.6Worst: Burkina Faso 0
Best: Romania 100
67.6% |
67.6Value: 67.6
|
| proportion of skilled production workers |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
67.5Worst: Mauritania 0
Best: South Africa 100
67.5% |
67.5Value: 67.5
|
| unemployment rate with vocational education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
38.1Worst: Cape Verde 0
Best: Qatar 100
38.1% |
38.1Value: 38.1
|
| share of tvet occupations |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
5.2Worst: Burundi 0
Best: Qatar 100
5.2% |
5.2Value: 5.2
|
| manufacturing employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
20Worst: Chad 0
Best: Lesotho 100
20% |
20Value: 20
|
| enrolment in vocational education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.9 |
5.6 |
79.2Worst: Yemen 5.6
Best: Brunei Darussalam 99.9
78.05% |
79.2Value: 79.2
|
| vulnerable employment rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
29.8Worst: Niger 0
Best: Qatar 100
29.8% |
29.8Value: 29.8
|
inputs (higher education)
Rank 121 / Score 27.6 |
| government expenditure per tertiary student |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
6.8Worst: St. Lucia 0
Best: Luxembourg 100
6.8% |
6.8Value: 6.8
|
| teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
58.6Worst: Kenya 0
Best: Indonesia 100
58.6% |
58.6Value: 58.6
|
| enrolment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
2.6Worst: Niger 0
Best: Greece 100
2.6% |
2.6Value: 2.6
|
| enrolment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0.9Worst: Burundi 0
Best: France 100
0.9% |
0.9Value: 0.9
|
| pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
61.7Worst: Sudan 0
Best: Lebanon 100
61.7% |
61.7Value: 61.7
|
| researchers in higher education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
35Worst: Mali 0
Best: Senegal 100
35% |
35Value: 35
|
learning environment
Rank 152 / Score 20.18 |
| teachers in tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.3 |
0 |
26.7Worst: Myanmar 0
Best: Panama 99.3
26.89% |
26.7Value: 26.7
|
| inbound mobility rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
12.8Worst: Afghanistan 0
Best: Australia 100
12.8% |
12.8Value: 12.8
|
| academic freedom |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.2 |
4.1 |
8.2Worst: Bahrain 4.1
Best: Uruguay 97.2
4.4% |
8.2Value: 8.2
|
| gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.2 |
31.8 |
62.4Worst: Niger 31.8
Best: Kyrgyz Republic 99.2
45.4% |
62.4Value: 62.4
|
| gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
1 |
9.8Worst: Mozambique 1
Best: Barbados 100
8.89% |
9.8Value: 9.8
|
| gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
46 |
0 |
1.2Worst: Angola 0
Best: State of Palestine 46
2.61% |
1.2Value: 1.2
|
outputs (higher education)
Rank 101 / Score 43.33 |
| educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
8.7Worst: Burundi 0
Best: Lithuania 100
8.7% |
8.7Value: 8.7
|
| educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
1Worst: Guatemala 0
Best: Georgia 100
1% |
1Value: 1
|
| educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0.8Worst: Dominican Republic 0
Best: Slovenia 100
0.8% |
0.8Value: 0.8
|
| labour force participation rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
66Worst: Venezuela 0
Best: Tanzania 100
66% |
66Value: 66
|
| unemployment rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
48.9Worst: Trinidad and Tobago 0
Best: Myanmar 100
48.9% |
48.9Value: 48.9
|
| university-industry collaboration in r&d |
Initial Value: 1
|
78.5 |
16 |
38.1Worst: Angola 16
Best: Israel 78.5
35.36% |
38.1Value: 38.1
|
| citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Chad 0
Best: Cyprus 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
inputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 93 / Score 23.92 |
| gerd (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
12.9Worst: Madagascar 0
Best: Israel 100
12.9% |
12.9Value: 12.9
|
| gerd per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Madagascar 0
Best: Botswana 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
| researchers per thousand labour force |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0
Best: Denmark 100
0% |
0Value: 0
|
| tertiary graduates from stem programmes (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
23.9Worst: Eswatini 0
Best: Gambia 100
23.9% |
23.9Value: 23.9
|
| gerd performed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
1.2Worst: Azerbaijan 0
Best: Korea, Rep. 100
1.2% |
1.2Value: 1.2
|
| gerd financed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0.8Worst: Brunei Darussalam 0
Best: Thailand 100
0.8% |
0.8Value: 0.8
|
| researchers in business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
6.5Worst: Mozambique 0
Best: Korea, Rep. 100
6.5% |
6.5Value: 6.5
|
| firms that spend on r&d (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
15.3Worst: Lesotho 0
Best: Finland 100
15.3% |
15.3Value: 15.3
|
| high-skilled employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
16.1Worst: Mali 0
Best: United States 100
16.1% |
16.1Value: 16.1
|
| intellectual property payments (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0.2Worst: Armenia 0
Best: Ireland 100
0.2% |
0.2Value: 0.2
|
| state of cluster development |
Initial Value: 1
|
74.9 |
23.5 |
47.7Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 23.5
Best: Italy 74.9
47.08% |
47.7Value: 47.7
|
outputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 99 / Score 29.41 |
| average documents per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
90.6Worst: Uzbekistan 0
Best: Panama 100
90.6% |
90.6Value: 90.6
|
| citations per document |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
17.1Worst: Indonesia 0
Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100
17.1% |
17.1Value: 17.1
|
| patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
36.1Worst: Tanzania 0
Best: Korea, Rep. 100
36.1% |
36.1Value: 36.1
|
| intellectual property receipts (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
3.1Worst: Angola 0
Best: Netherlands 100
3.1% |
3.1Value: 3.1
|
| industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
1.2Worst: Dominican Republic 0
Best: China 100
1.2% |
1.2Value: 1.2
|
| pct applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
39.8Worst: Pakistan 0
Best: Barbados 100
39.8% |
39.8Value: 39.8
|
| firms producing new goods and services (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
18Worst: Egypt 0
Best: Finland 100
18% |
18Value: 18
|
| trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
9.4Worst: Chad 0
Best: China 100
9.4% |
9.4Value: 9.4
|
| cultural goods exports (% exports) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
3.1Worst: Algeria 0
Best: St. Lucia 100
3.1% |
3.1Value: 3.1
|
| printing and publishing output (% manufactured output) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Lao PDR 0
Best: Kenya 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
impact
Rank 66 / Score 31.22 |
| research institutions prominence |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
5Worst: Albania 0
Best: China 100
5% |
5Value: 5
|
| growth of innovative companies |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
1.3Worst: Sierra Leone 0
Best: Belarus 100
1.3% |
1.3Value: 1.3
|
| iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.8 |
0.4 |
55.5Worst: Jamaica 0.4
Best: Israel 80.8
68.53% |
55.5Value: 55.5
|
| iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
1.5Worst: Afghanistan 0
Best: Bulgaria 100
1.5% |
1.5Value: 1.5
|
| gerd financed from abroad (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
64.2Worst: Algeria 0
Best: Israel 100
64.2% |
64.2Value: 64.2
|
| joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
25.4Worst: Cape Verde 0
Best: Israel 100
25.4% |
25.4Value: 25.4
|
| computer software spending (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
4Worst: Ethiopia 0
Best: United States 100
4% |
4Value: 4
|
| new business density per thousand population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
7.4Worst: Liberia 0
Best: Botswana 100
7.4% |
7.4Value: 7.4
|
| firms with new product/service (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
85.9Worst: St. Lucia 0
Best: Lesotho 100
85.9% |
85.9Value: 85.9
|
infrastructure
Rank 116 / Score 35.11 |
| 3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
97.8Worst: Niger 0
Best: Armenia 100
97.8% |
97.8Value: 97.8
|
| secure internet servers per 1 million population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
1.5Worst: Chad 0
Best: Denmark 100
1.5% |
1.5Value: 1.5
|
| investment in telecommunication services (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
38.7Worst: Mauritania 0
Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100
38.7% |
38.7Value: 38.7
|
| mobile upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
2.3Worst: Niger 0
Best: United Arab Emirates 100
2.3% |
2.3Value: 2.3
|
| fixed-broadband upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
7.2Worst: Algeria 0
Best: Singapore 100
7.2% |
7.2Value: 7.2
|
| fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0.2Worst: Afghanistan 0
Best: Switzerland 100
0.2% |
0.2Value: 0.2
|
| fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
38.5Worst: Burundi 0
Best: Kuwait 100
38.5% |
38.5Value: 38.5
|
| mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
29.8Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0
Best: Luxembourg 100
29.8% |
29.8Value: 29.8
|
| internet and telephony competition |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Madagascar 0
Best: Albania 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
access
Rank 122 / Score 18.32 |
| active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
18Worst: Chad 0
Best: United Arab Emirates 100
18% |
18Value: 18
|
| international internet bandwidth per user |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
22.4Worst: Ethiopia 0
Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
22.4% |
22.4Value: 22.4
|
| households with internet access at home (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
9.1Worst: Burundi 0
Best: United Arab Emirates 100
9.1% |
9.1Value: 9.1
|
| individuals with standard ict skills (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Togo 0
Best: United Arab Emirates 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| tertiary graduates from ict programmes (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
38.6Worst: Eswatini 0
Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
38.6% |
38.6Value: 38.6
|
| ict employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
3.5Worst: Chad 0
Best: Israel 100
3.5% |
3.5Value: 3.5
|
usage
Rank 96 / Score 38.41 |
| government online services |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
61.8Worst: State of Palestine 0
Best: Korea, Rep. 100
61.8% |
61.8Value: 61.8
|
| fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
70.7Worst: Bhutan 0
Best: Kuwait 100
70.7% |
70.7Value: 70.7
|
| mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
3.3Worst: Bhutan 0
Best: Kuwait 100
3.3% |
3.3Value: 3.3
|
| internet users (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
21.9Worst: Burundi 0
Best: United Arab Emirates 100
21.9% |
21.9Value: 21.9
|
| ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
44Worst: Indonesia 0
Best: Barbados 100
44% |
44Value: 44
|
| e-participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
63.1Worst: State of Palestine 0
Best: Estonia 100
63.1% |
63.1Value: 63.1
|
| internet activities by individuals (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: Azerbaijan 0
Best: Denmark 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
5.1Worst: Lao PDR 0
Best: Ireland 100
5.1% |
5.1Value: 5.1
|
economic competitiveness
Rank 94 / Score 47 |
| gross fixed capital formation (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
55Worst: Iraq 0
Best: Tanzania 100
55% |
55Value: 55
|
| logistics performance |
Initial Value: 1
|
80 |
23.7 |
49.4Worst: Afghanistan 23.7
Best: Germany 80
45.65% |
49.4Value: 49.4
|
| transport productive capacity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
19.3Worst: Mauritania 0
Best: Belize 100
19.3% |
19.3Value: 19.3
|
| building quality control |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
13.3 |
100Worst: Liberia 13.3
Best: China 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
| ease of starting a business |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
52.4 |
93.2Worst: Cambodia 52.4
Best: New Zealand 100
85.71% |
93.2Value: 93.2
|
| insolvency recovery rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
21Worst: Chad 0
Best: Japan 100
21% |
21Value: 21
|
| entrepreneurial employee activity rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
NAWorst: China 0
Best: Denmark 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
| extent of corporate transparency |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
0Worst: Afghanistan 0
Best: Australia 100
0% |
0Value: 0
|
economic openness
Rank 86 / Score 52.16 |
| trade (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
20.6Worst: Sudan 0
Best: Ireland 100
20.6% |
20.6Value: 20.6
|
| high-technology trade (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
58.5Worst: Afghanistan 0
Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
58.5% |
58.5Value: 58.5
|
| product concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.2 |
10.9 |
55.6Worst: Chad 10.9
Best: Croatia 94.2
53.66% |
55.6Value: 55.6
|
| market concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.9 |
45.7 |
62.2Worst: Bhutan 45.7
Best: Ukraine 96.9
32.23% |
62.2Value: 62.2
|
| chinn-ito financial openness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
74.7Worst: Angola 0
Best: Australia 100
74.7% |
74.7Value: 74.7
|
| foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
45.3Worst: Angola 0
Best: Cyprus 100
45.3% |
45.3Value: 45.3
|
| debt dynamics |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
45.3Worst: Mozambique 0
Best: Australia 100
45.3% |
45.3Value: 45.3
|
financing and domestic value added
Rank 131 / Score 37.22 |
| domestic credit to private sector (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
8.4Worst: Afghanistan 0
Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
8.4% |
8.4Value: 8.4
|
| msme financing gap (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
70.5Worst: Philippines 0
Best: North Macedonia 100
70.5% |
70.5Value: 70.5
|
| tax and contribution rate (% profit) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
74.4Worst: Argentina 0
Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
74.4% |
74.4Value: 74.4
|
| bank non-performing loans (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
82.1Worst: Angola 0
Best: Korea, Rep. 100
82.1% |
82.1Value: 82.1
|
| medium- and high-tech activities value added |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
11.2Worst: Cambodia 0
Best: Singapore 100
11.2% |
11.2Value: 11.2
|
| industry and services value added (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
38.5Worst: Sierra Leone 0
Best: Kuwait 100
38.5% |
38.5Value: 38.5
|
| labour underutilization rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
11.6Worst: Benin 0
Best: Thailand 100
11.6% |
11.6Value: 11.6
|
| output per worker |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
1.1Worst: Burundi 0
Best: Luxembourg 100
1.1% |
1.1Value: 1.1
|
governance
Rank 69 / Score 48.3 |
| peace and stability |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.6 |
0.5 |
48.1Worst: Afghanistan 0.5
Best: New Zealand 97.6
49.02% |
48.1Value: 48.1
|
| voice and accountability |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
3.4 |
17.9Worst: Lao PDR 3.4
Best: Norway 100
15.01% |
17.9Value: 17.9
|
| rule of law |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
56.7Worst: Venezuela 0
Best: Finland 100
56.7% |
56.7Value: 56.7
|
| control of corruption |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
1.9 |
69.7Worst: Yemen 1.9
Best: Denmark 100
69.11% |
69.7Value: 69.7
|
| government effectiveness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0.5 |
64.4Worst: Yemen 0.5
Best: Singapore 100
64.22% |
64.4Value: 64.4
|
socio-economic
Rank 66 / Score 59.64 |
| female-to-male ratio in parliament |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Yemen 0
Best: Mexico 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
| female-to-male labour force participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
100Worst: Yemen 0
Best: Burundi 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
| female-to-male ratio in internet usage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
52.1 |
NAWorst: Burundi 52.1
Best: Armenia 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
| social protection coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
6.3Worst: Uganda 0
Best: Australia 100
6.3% |
6.3Value: 6.3
|
| adult literacy rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
65.5Worst: Chad 0
Best: Ukraine 100
65.5% |
65.5Value: 65.5
|
| youth not in employment, education or training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
93.6Worst: Iraq 0
Best: Japan 100
93.6% |
93.6Value: 93.6
|
| poverty headcount ratio (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
46.4Worst: Madagascar 0
Best: China 100
46.4% |
46.4Value: 46.4
|
| gdp per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
1.2Worst: Burundi 0
Best: Luxembourg 100
1.2% |
1.2Value: 1.2
|
health and environment
Rank 10 / Score 72.63 |
| universal health coverage |
Initial Value: 1
|
87 |
28 |
57Worst: Chad 28
Best: Australia 87
49.15% |
57Value: 57
|
| healthy life expectancy (years) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
53.5Worst: Lesotho 0
Best: Japan 100
53.5% |
53.5Value: 53.5
|
| under-five mortality rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
71.9Worst: Nigeria 0
Best: Iceland 100
71.9% |
71.9Value: 71.9
|
| renewable energy consumption (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
88.9Worst: Bahrain 0
Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100
88.9% |
88.9Value: 88.9
|
| ecological footprint per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
99.5Worst: Luxembourg 0
Best: Yemen 100
99.5% |
99.5Value: 99.5
|
| natural hazard exposure |
Initial Value: 1
|
95 |
16 |
65Worst: Philippines 16
Best: Finland 95
62.03% |
65Value: 65
|
ESCWA
Sign in / Register