KPI  |
2023 - Saudi Arabia |
Weight  |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value  |
Current Value |
knowledge capital
Rank 68 / Score 69.16 |
net enrollment rate in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Myanmar 100.00
98.7% |
98.7Value: 98.7
|
net enrollment rate in lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: France 100.00
98% |
98Value: 98
|
net enrollment rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Portugal 100.00
99.5% |
99.5Value: 99.5
|
years of compulsory education in primary and secondary  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Germany 100.00
69.2% |
69.2Value: 69.2
|
completion rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Mauritius 100.00
73% |
73Value: 73
|
assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
23.4% |
23.4Value: 23.4
|
learning-adjusted years of schooling  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
51.9% |
51.9Value: 51.9
|
educational enabling environment
Rank 43 / Score 72.71 |
government expenditure on primary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
90.6% |
90.6Value: 90.6
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
92.3% |
92.3Value: 92.3
|
schools with access to computers in primary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
schools with access to computers in secondary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
gross enrollment ratio in early childhood education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
11.1% |
11.1Value: 11.1
|
proportion of children who are developmentally on track  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
88.3% |
88.3Value: 88.3
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
46.60 |
Worst: Chad 46.60 Best: Uganda 100.00
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.90 |
0.90 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.90 Best: Russian Federation 99.90
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritius 0.00 Best: Austria 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
tvet components
Rank 65 / Score 42.21 |
firms offering formal training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Saudi Arabia 0.00 Best: Ecuador 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
Labor force with short-cycle tertiary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Poland 0.00 Best: Latvia 100.00
88.4% |
88.4Value: 88.4
|
participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Sweden 100.00
18.9% |
18.9Value: 18.9
|
government expenditure on vocational education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
Share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programs  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Saudi Arabia 0.00 Best: Bolivia 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Malta 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
extent of staff training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.40 |
22.60 |
Worst: Mauritania 22.60 Best: Switzerland 80.40
77.34% |
67.3Value: 67.3
|
quality of vocational training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
89.50 |
21.10 |
Worst: Mauritania 21.10 Best: Switzerland 89.50
65.94% |
66.2Value: 66.2
|
ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0.00 Best: Burundi 100.00
23.5% |
23.5Value: 23.5
|
ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0.00 Best: Burundi 100.00
6.5% |
6.5Value: 6.5
|
tvet labor market
Rank 24 / Score 71.83 |
firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Spain 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
97.9% |
97.9Value: 97.9
|
employment educational mismatch (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
proportion of skilled production workers  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
46.6% |
46.6Value: 46.6
|
unemployment rate with vocational education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
share of tvet occupations  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
75.5% |
75.5Value: 75.5
|
manufacturing employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Czech Republic 100.00
17.6% |
17.6Value: 17.6
|
enrollment in vocational education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
15.00 |
Worst: Oman 15.00 Best: Uganda 100.00
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
vulnerable employment rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
96.7% |
96.7Value: 96.7
|
inputs (higher education)
Rank 44 / Score 45.88 |
government expenditure per tertiary student  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kyrgyz Republic 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kenya 0.00 Best: Colombia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
enrollment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Greece 100.00
33.9% |
33.9Value: 33.9
|
enrollment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Suriname 0.00 Best: Norway 100.00
13.4% |
13.4Value: 13.4
|
pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Benin 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
68.1% |
68.1Value: 68.1
|
researchers in higher education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Senegal 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
learning environment
Rank 111 / Score 31.87 |
teachers in tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.30 |
0.00 |
Worst: Myanmar 0.00 Best: United States 98.30
76.2% |
74.9Value: 74.9
|
inbound mobility rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100.00
14.5% |
14.5Value: 14.5
|
academic freedom  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.70 |
1.50 |
Worst: Myanmar 1.50 Best: Czech Republic 97.70
4.89% |
6.2Value: 6.2
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
24.50 |
Worst: Tanzania 24.50 Best: Bolivia 100.00
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
48.70 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Dominican Republic 48.70
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.60 |
0.70 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0.70 Best: State of Palestine 98.60
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
outputs (higher education)
Rank 33 / Score 56.42 |
Educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
65.1% |
65.1Value: 65.1
|
educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Guatemala 0.00 Best: Georgia 100.00
13.6% |
13.6Value: 13.6
|
educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: Slovenia 100.00
38.8% |
38.8Value: 38.8
|
Labor force participation rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Ethiopia 100.00
74.6% |
74.6Value: 74.6
|
unemployment rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: State of Palestine 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
73.6% |
73.6Value: 73.6
|
university-industry collaboration in r&d  |
Initial Value: 1
|
79.20 |
20.80 |
Worst: Myanmar 20.80 Best: Switzerland 79.20
60.27% |
56Value: 56
|
citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
inputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 31 / Score 38.39 |
gerd (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
8.5% |
8.5Value: 8.5
|
gerd per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
60.5% |
60.5Value: 60.5
|
researchers per thousand labor force  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
6.1% |
6.1Value: 6.1
|
tertiary graduates from stem programs (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Malaysia 100.00
69.8% |
69.8Value: 69.8
|
gerd performed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
gerd financed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Brunei Darussalam 0.00 Best: Thailand 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
researchers in business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
firms that spend on r&d (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
9.3% |
9.3Value: 9.3
|
high-skilled employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
intellectual property payments (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Armenia 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
state of cluster development  |
Initial Value: 1
|
71.80 |
28.70 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 28.70 Best: Saudi Arabia 71.80
100% |
71.8Value: 71.8
|
outputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 22 / Score 39.2 |
average documents per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Colombia 100.00
86.9% |
86.9Value: 86.9
|
citations per document  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Indonesia 0.00 Best: Cape Verde 100.00
69.9% |
69.9Value: 69.9
|
patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
55.4% |
55.4Value: 55.4
|
intellectual property receipts (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Armenia 0.00 Best: Malta 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Honduras 0.00 Best: Italy 100.00
3.8% |
3.8Value: 3.8
|
pct applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
5.5% |
5.5Value: 5.5
|
firms producing new goods and services (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
6.7% |
6.7Value: 6.7
|
trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Iran, Islamic Rep. 100.00
8.6% |
8.6Value: 8.6
|
cultural goods exports (% exports)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Dominican Republic 100.00
0.5% |
0.5Value: 0.5
|
printing and publishing output (% manufactured output)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Malta 100.00
20.9% |
20.9Value: 20.9
|
impact
Rank 39 / Score 36.12 |
research institutions prominence  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
65.6% |
65.6Value: 65.6
|
growth of innovative companies  |
Initial Value: 1
|
72.50 |
28.70 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 28.70 Best: Israel 72.50
98.63% |
71.9Value: 71.9
|
iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tajikistan 0.00 Best: Belarus 100.00
5.1% |
5.1Value: 5.1
|
iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Bulgaria 100.00
6.4% |
6.4Value: 6.4
|
gerd financed from abroad (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Iran, Islamic Rep. 0.00 Best: Canada 100.00
9% |
9Value: 9
|
computer software spending (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
30.7% |
30.7Value: 30.7
|
new business density per thousand population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Estonia 100.00
2.5% |
2.5Value: 2.5
|
firms with new product/service (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Pakistan 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
infrastructure
Rank 44 / Score 67.62 |
3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
secure internet servers per 1 million population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
43.1% |
43.1Value: 43.1
|
investment in telecommunication services (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
33.5% |
33.5Value: 33.5
|
mobile upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
65.6% |
65.6Value: 65.6
|
fixed-broadband upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
22.9% |
22.9Value: 22.9
|
fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Switzerland 100.00
73.6% |
73.6Value: 73.6
|
fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
76.6% |
76.6Value: 76.6
|
mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
93.3% |
93.3Value: 93.3
|
internet and telephony competition  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
access
Rank 1 / Score 76.19 |
active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
52.5% |
52.5Value: 52.5
|
international internet bandwidth per user  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
66% |
66Value: 66
|
households with internet access at home (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Bahrain 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
individuals with standard ict skills (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Togo 0.00 Best: Saudi Arabia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
tertiary graduates from ict programs (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
59.1% |
59.1Value: 59.1
|
ict employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Trinidad and Tobago 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
usage
Rank 38 / Score 52.48 |
government online services  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
9.50 |
Worst: Mauritania 9.50 Best: Estonia 100.00
80.33% |
82.2Value: 82.2
|
fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
11.7% |
11.7Value: 11.7
|
mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
78.6% |
78.6Value: 78.6
|
internet users (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Bahrain 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
4.4% |
4.4Value: 4.4
|
e-participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.90 |
2.30 |
Worst: Mauritania 2.30 Best: Australia 98.90
69.36% |
69.3Value: 69.3
|
internet activities by individuals (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: El Salvador 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
52.6% |
52.6Value: 52.6
|
trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Paraguay 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
21% |
21Value: 21
|
economic competitiveness
Rank 35 / Score 60.85 |
gross fixed capital formation (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ukraine 0.00 Best: Mauritania 100.00
28.8% |
28.8Value: 28.8
|
logistics performance  |
Initial Value: 1
|
82.50 |
26.60 |
Worst: Burundi 26.60 Best: Singapore 82.50
59.75% |
60Value: 60
|
transport productive capacity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Seychelles 100.00
58.7% |
58.7Value: 58.7
|
building quality control  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
23.30 |
Worst: Gambia 23.30 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
73.92% |
80Value: 80
|
ease of starting a business  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
52.40 |
Worst: Cambodia 52.40 Best: New Zealand 100.00
85.5% |
93.1Value: 93.1
|
insolvency recovery rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Norway 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
entrepreneurial employee activity rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Russian Federation 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
1.4% |
1.4Value: 1.4
|
extent of corporate transparency  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Albania 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
economic openness
Rank 64 / Score 53.8 |
trade (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: United States 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
10.5% |
10.5Value: 10.5
|
high-technology trade (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Albania 0.00 Best: Malaysia 100.00
17.3% |
17.3Value: 17.3
|
product concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.30 |
14.10 |
Worst: Mali 14.10 Best: Poland 94.30
33.17% |
40.7Value: 40.7
|
market concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.80 |
29.30 |
Worst: Mongolia 29.30 Best: Turkey 96.80
91.7% |
91.2Value: 91.2
|
chinn-ito financial openness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
70% |
70Value: 70
|
foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cyprus 0.00 Best: Hungary 100.00
33% |
33Value: 33
|
debt dynamics  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
financing and domestic value added
Rank 20 / Score 61.81 |
domestic credit to private sector (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
17.5% |
17.5Value: 17.5
|
msme financing gap (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Philippines 0.00 Best: North Macedonia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
tax and contribution rate (% profit)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Argentina 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
92.2% |
92.2Value: 92.2
|
bank non-performing loans (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
89.4% |
89.4Value: 89.4
|
medium- and high-tech activities value added  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cambodia 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
44.7% |
44.7Value: 44.7
|
industry and services value added (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
62.7% |
62.7Value: 62.7
|
labor underutilization rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Rwanda 0.00 Best: Cambodia 100.00
74.6% |
74.6Value: 74.6
|
output per worker  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
47% |
47Value: 47
|
governance
Rank 74 / Score 42.03 |
peace and stability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.20 |
1.40 |
Worst: Mali 1.40 Best: Singapore 97.20
32.05% |
32.1Value: 32.1
|
voice and accountability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
1.90 |
Worst: Myanmar 1.90 Best: Norway 100.00
5.91% |
7.7Value: 7.7
|
rule of law  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
3.30 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 3.30 Best: Denmark 100.00
62.46% |
63.7Value: 63.7
|
control of corruption  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
3.30 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 3.30 Best: Singapore 100.00
69.8% |
70.8Value: 70.8
|
government effectiveness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
4.20 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 4.20 Best: Finland 100.00
56.16% |
58Value: 58
|
socio-economic
Rank 64 / Score 58.43 |
female-to-male ratio in parliament  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
2.40 |
Worst: Oman 2.40 Best: Mexico 100.00
22.95% |
24.8Value: 24.8
|
female-to-male labor force participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
22.30 |
Worst: Egypt 22.30 Best: Burundi 100.00
16.47% |
35.1Value: 35.1
|
female-to-male ratio in internet usage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
33.10 |
Worst: Niger 33.10 Best: Armenia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
social protection coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uganda 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
77.2% |
77.2Value: 77.2
|
adult literacy rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Ukraine 100.00
96.7% |
96.7Value: 96.7
|
youth not in employment, education or training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
63.4% |
63.4Value: 63.4
|
poverty headcount ratio (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Ukraine 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
gdp per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
42.9% |
42.9Value: 42.9
|
health and environment
Rank 93 / Score 60.45 |
universal health coverage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
91.00 |
29.40 |
Worst: Chad 29.40 Best: Canada 91.00
73.05% |
74.4Value: 74.4
|
healthy life expectancy (years)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
67.5% |
67.5Value: 67.5
|
under-five mortality rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Estonia 100.00
95.8% |
95.8Value: 95.8
|
renewable energy consumption (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bahrain 0.00 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100.00
0.1% |
0.1Value: 0.1
|
ecological footprint per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Luxembourg 0.00 Best: Rwanda 100.00
55.9% |
55.9Value: 55.9
|
natural hazard exposure  |
Initial Value: 1
|
95.00 |
16.00 |
Worst: Philippines 16.00 Best: Finland 95.00
67.09% |
69Value: 69
|