KPI |
2023 - Slovenia |
Weight |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value |
Current Value |
knowledge capital
Rank 16 / Score 85.38 |
net enrollment rate in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Myanmar 100.00
96.6% |
96.6Value: 96.6
|
net enrollment rate in lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: France 100.00
97.8% |
97.8Value: 97.8
|
net enrollment rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Portugal 100.00
95.8% |
95.8Value: 95.8
|
years of compulsory education in primary and secondary |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Germany 100.00
69.2% |
69.2Value: 69.2
|
completion rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
96.4% |
96.4Value: 96.4
|
gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Mauritius 100.00
69.3% |
69.3Value: 69.3
|
assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
76.3% |
76.3Value: 76.3
|
learning-adjusted years of schooling |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
85.9% |
85.9Value: 85.9
|
educational enabling environment
Rank 15 / Score 79.51 |
government expenditure on primary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
36% |
36Value: 36
|
government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
33.6% |
33.6Value: 33.6
|
government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
65.4% |
65.4Value: 65.4
|
government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
40.6% |
40.6Value: 40.6
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
schools with access to computers in primary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
schools with access to computers in secondary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
gross enrollment ratio in early childhood education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
76.5% |
76.5Value: 76.5
|
proportion of children who are developmentally on track |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
46.60 |
Worst: Chad 46.60 Best: Uganda 100.00
91.2% |
95.3Value: 95.3
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.90 |
0.90 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.90 Best: Russian Federation 99.90
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritius 0.00 Best: Austria 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
tvet components
Rank 26 / Score 52.74 |
firms offering formal training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Saudi Arabia 0.00 Best: Ecuador 100.00
57.4% |
57.4Value: 57.4
|
Labor force with short-cycle tertiary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Poland 0.00 Best: Latvia 100.00
63.7% |
63.7Value: 63.7
|
participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Sweden 100.00
51.5% |
51.5Value: 51.5
|
government expenditure on vocational education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
57.2% |
57.2Value: 57.2
|
Share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programs |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Saudi Arabia 0.00 Best: Bolivia 100.00
63.1% |
63.1Value: 63.1
|
share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Malta 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
extent of staff training |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.40 |
22.60 |
Worst: Mauritania 22.60 Best: Switzerland 80.40
73.01% |
64.8Value: 64.8
|
quality of vocational training |
Initial Value: 1
|
89.50 |
21.10 |
Worst: Mauritania 21.10 Best: Switzerland 89.50
52.63% |
57.1Value: 57.1
|
ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0.00 Best: Burundi 100.00
14.2% |
14.2Value: 14.2
|
ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0.00 Best: Burundi 100.00
26% |
26Value: 26
|
tvet labor market
Rank 7 / Score 78.28 |
firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Spain 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
62.4% |
62.4Value: 62.4
|
employment educational mismatch (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
77.7% |
77.7Value: 77.7
|
proportion of skilled production workers |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
53.4% |
53.4Value: 53.4
|
unemployment rate with vocational education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
89.2% |
89.2Value: 89.2
|
share of tvet occupations |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
75.3% |
75.3Value: 75.3
|
manufacturing employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Czech Republic 100.00
83.8% |
83.8Value: 83.8
|
enrollment in vocational education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
15.00 |
Worst: Oman 15.00 Best: Uganda 100.00
76.47% |
80Value: 80
|
vulnerable employment rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
89.2% |
89.2Value: 89.2
|
inputs (higher education)
Rank 48 / Score 44.48 |
government expenditure per tertiary student |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kyrgyz Republic 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
27.6% |
27.6Value: 27.6
|
teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kenya 0.00 Best: Colombia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
enrollment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Greece 100.00
34.5% |
34.5Value: 34.5
|
enrollment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Suriname 0.00 Best: Norway 100.00
71% |
71Value: 71
|
pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Benin 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
86% |
86Value: 86
|
researchers in higher education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Senegal 100.00
20.2% |
20.2Value: 20.2
|
learning environment
Rank 21 / Score 70.3 |
teachers in tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.30 |
0.00 |
Worst: Myanmar 0.00 Best: United States 98.30
87.08% |
85.6Value: 85.6
|
inbound mobility rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100.00
32.2% |
32.2Value: 32.2
|
academic freedom |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.70 |
1.50 |
Worst: Myanmar 1.50 Best: Czech Republic 97.70
95.22% |
93.1Value: 93.1
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
24.50 |
Worst: Tanzania 24.50 Best: Bolivia 100.00
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
48.70 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Dominican Republic 48.70
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.60 |
0.70 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0.70 Best: State of Palestine 98.60
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
outputs (higher education)
Rank 4 / Score 69.49 |
Educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
44.5% |
44.5Value: 44.5
|
educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Guatemala 0.00 Best: Georgia 100.00
62% |
62Value: 62
|
educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: Slovenia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
Labor force participation rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Ethiopia 100.00
77.7% |
77.7Value: 77.7
|
unemployment rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: State of Palestine 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
91.9% |
91.9Value: 91.9
|
university-industry collaboration in r&d |
Initial Value: 1
|
79.20 |
20.80 |
Worst: Myanmar 20.80 Best: Switzerland 79.20
53.25% |
51.9Value: 51.9
|
citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
57.8% |
57.8Value: 57.8
|
inputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 18 / Score 49.21 |
gerd (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
39.9% |
39.9Value: 39.9
|
gerd per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
18.8% |
18.8Value: 18.8
|
researchers per thousand labor force |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
63.4% |
63.4Value: 63.4
|
tertiary graduates from stem programs (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Malaysia 100.00
69.9% |
69.9Value: 69.9
|
gerd performed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
33.2% |
33.2Value: 33.2
|
gerd financed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Brunei Darussalam 0.00 Best: Thailand 100.00
78.1% |
78.1Value: 78.1
|
researchers in business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
75.7% |
75.7Value: 75.7
|
firms that spend on r&d (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
54.7% |
54.7Value: 54.7
|
high-skilled employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
64.1% |
64.1Value: 64.1
|
intellectual property payments (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Armenia 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
12.7% |
12.7Value: 12.7
|
state of cluster development |
Initial Value: 1
|
71.80 |
28.70 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 28.70 Best: Saudi Arabia 71.80
36.43% |
44.4Value: 44.4
|
outputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 31 / Score 35.53 |
average documents per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Colombia 100.00
24.8% |
24.8Value: 24.8
|
citations per document |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Indonesia 0.00 Best: Cape Verde 100.00
34.9% |
34.9Value: 34.9
|
patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
66.6% |
66.6Value: 66.6
|
intellectual property receipts (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Armenia 0.00 Best: Malta 100.00
10.4% |
10.4Value: 10.4
|
industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Honduras 0.00 Best: Italy 100.00
25.1% |
25.1Value: 25.1
|
pct applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
28% |
28Value: 28
|
firms producing new goods and services (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
77.5% |
77.5Value: 77.5
|
trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Iran, Islamic Rep. 100.00
30.6% |
30.6Value: 30.6
|
cultural goods exports (% exports) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Dominican Republic 100.00
10.1% |
10.1Value: 10.1
|
printing and publishing output (% manufactured output) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Malta 100.00
27.3% |
27.3Value: 27.3
|
impact
Rank 46 / Score 34.53 |
research institutions prominence |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
56.7% |
56.7Value: 56.7
|
growth of innovative companies |
Initial Value: 1
|
72.50 |
28.70 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 28.70 Best: Israel 72.50
32.19% |
42.8Value: 42.8
|
iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tajikistan 0.00 Best: Belarus 100.00
59.7% |
59.7Value: 59.7
|
iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Bulgaria 100.00
49% |
49Value: 49
|
gerd financed from abroad (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
24.9% |
24.9Value: 24.9
|
joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Iran, Islamic Rep. 0.00 Best: Canada 100.00
10.3% |
10.3Value: 10.3
|
computer software spending (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
6.3% |
6.3Value: 6.3
|
new business density per thousand population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Estonia 100.00
9.9% |
9.9Value: 9.9
|
firms with new product/service (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Pakistan 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
65.5% |
65.5Value: 65.5
|
infrastructure
Rank 12 / Score 80.2 |
3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
99.7% |
99.7Value: 99.7
|
secure internet servers per 1 million population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
86.2% |
86.2Value: 86.2
|
investment in telecommunication services (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
58.9% |
58.9Value: 58.9
|
mobile upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
fixed-broadband upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Switzerland 100.00
63.8% |
63.8Value: 63.8
|
fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
88% |
88Value: 88
|
mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
97.6% |
97.6Value: 97.6
|
internet and telephony competition |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
access
Rank 32 / Score 52.72 |
active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
39.5% |
39.5Value: 39.5
|
international internet bandwidth per user |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
65.4% |
65.4Value: 65.4
|
households with internet access at home (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Bahrain 100.00
92.5% |
92.5Value: 92.5
|
individuals with standard ict skills (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Togo 0.00 Best: Saudi Arabia 100.00
47.3% |
47.3Value: 47.3
|
tertiary graduates from ict programs (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
26.8% |
26.8Value: 26.8
|
ict employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Trinidad and Tobago 100.00
44.8% |
44.8Value: 44.8
|
usage
Rank 26 / Score 58.28 |
government online services |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
9.50 |
Worst: Mauritania 9.50 Best: Estonia 100.00
85.3% |
86.7Value: 86.7
|
fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
27.5% |
27.5Value: 27.5
|
internet users (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Bahrain 100.00
88.2% |
88.2Value: 88.2
|
ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
10.7% |
10.7Value: 10.7
|
e-participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.90 |
2.30 |
Worst: Mauritania 2.30 Best: Australia 98.90
75.26% |
75Value: 75
|
internet activities by individuals (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: El Salvador 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
71.7% |
71.7Value: 71.7
|
trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Paraguay 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
39% |
39Value: 39
|
economic competitiveness
Rank 31 / Score 63.36 |
gross fixed capital formation (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ukraine 0.00 Best: Mauritania 100.00
22.3% |
22.3Value: 22.3
|
logistics performance |
Initial Value: 1
|
82.50 |
26.60 |
Worst: Burundi 26.60 Best: Singapore 82.50
55.28% |
57.5Value: 57.5
|
transport productive capacity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Seychelles 100.00
15.6% |
15.6Value: 15.6
|
building quality control |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
23.30 |
Worst: Gambia 23.30 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
82.66% |
86.7Value: 86.7
|
ease of starting a business |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
52.40 |
Worst: Cambodia 52.40 Best: New Zealand 100.00
85.29% |
93Value: 93
|
insolvency recovery rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Norway 100.00
97.9% |
97.9Value: 97.9
|
entrepreneurial employee activity rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Russian Federation 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
62.5% |
62.5Value: 62.5
|
extent of corporate transparency |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Albania 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
71.4% |
71.4Value: 71.4
|
economic openness
Rank 24 / Score 65.84 |
trade (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: United States 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
42.8% |
42.8Value: 42.8
|
high-technology trade (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Albania 0.00 Best: Malaysia 100.00
35.3% |
35.3Value: 35.3
|
product concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.30 |
14.10 |
Worst: Mali 14.10 Best: Poland 94.30
82.92% |
80.6Value: 80.6
|
market concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.80 |
29.30 |
Worst: Mongolia 29.30 Best: Turkey 96.80
95.11% |
93.5Value: 93.5
|
chinn-ito financial openness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
70% |
70Value: 70
|
foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cyprus 0.00 Best: Hungary 100.00
35.9% |
35.9Value: 35.9
|
debt dynamics |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
financing and domestic value added
Rank 29 / Score 58.6 |
domestic credit to private sector (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
13.2% |
13.2Value: 13.2
|
msme financing gap (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Philippines 0.00 Best: North Macedonia 100.00
75.7% |
75.7Value: 75.7
|
tax and contribution rate (% profit) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Argentina 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
76.6% |
76.6Value: 76.6
|
bank non-performing loans (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
89.6% |
89.6Value: 89.6
|
medium- and high-tech activities value added |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cambodia 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
45.5% |
45.5Value: 45.5
|
industry and services value added (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
52.9% |
52.9Value: 52.9
|
labor underutilization rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Rwanda 0.00 Best: Cambodia 100.00
79.6% |
79.6Value: 79.6
|
output per worker |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
35.7% |
35.7Value: 35.7
|
governance
Rank 24 / Score 77.4 |
peace and stability |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.20 |
1.40 |
Worst: Mali 1.40 Best: Singapore 97.20
72.44% |
70.8Value: 70.8
|
voice and accountability |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
1.90 |
Worst: Myanmar 1.90 Best: Norway 100.00
77.37% |
77.8Value: 77.8
|
rule of law |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
3.30 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 3.30 Best: Denmark 100.00
77.56% |
78.3Value: 78.3
|
control of corruption |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
3.30 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 3.30 Best: Singapore 100.00
80.04% |
80.7Value: 80.7
|
government effectiveness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
4.20 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 4.20 Best: Finland 100.00
81.73% |
82.5Value: 82.5
|
socio-economic
Rank 14 / Score 78.42 |
female-to-male ratio in parliament |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
2.40 |
Worst: Oman 2.40 Best: Mexico 100.00
59.73% |
60.7Value: 60.7
|
female-to-male labor force participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
22.30 |
Worst: Egypt 22.30 Best: Burundi 100.00
81.85% |
85.9Value: 85.9
|
female-to-male ratio in internet usage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
33.10 |
Worst: Niger 33.10 Best: Armenia 100.00
97.31% |
98.2Value: 98.2
|
social protection coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uganda 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
94.7% |
94.7Value: 94.7
|
adult literacy rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Ukraine 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
youth not in employment, education or training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
93.1% |
93.1Value: 93.1
|
poverty headcount ratio (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Ukraine 100.00
83.4% |
83.4Value: 83.4
|
gdp per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
36.1% |
36.1Value: 36.1
|
health and environment
Rank 23 / Score 70.72 |
universal health coverage |
Initial Value: 1
|
91.00 |
29.40 |
Worst: Chad 29.40 Best: Canada 91.00
89.29% |
84.4Value: 84.4
|
healthy life expectancy (years) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
90.4% |
90.4Value: 90.4
|
under-five mortality rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Estonia 100.00
99.8% |
99.8Value: 99.8
|
renewable energy consumption (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bahrain 0.00 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100.00
23.3% |
23.3Value: 23.3
|
ecological footprint per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Luxembourg 0.00 Best: Rwanda 100.00
60.4% |
60.4Value: 60.4
|
natural hazard exposure |
Initial Value: 1
|
95.00 |
16.00 |
Worst: Philippines 16.00 Best: Finland 95.00
63.29% |
66Value: 66
|