KPI  |
2021 |
Weight  |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value  |
Solomon Islands |
knowledge capital
|
net enrollment rate in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mali 0 Best: France 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
net enrollment rate in lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Tanzania 0 Best: Israel 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
net enrollment rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Azerbaijan 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
years of compulsory education in primary and secondary  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Germany 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
completion rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Kazakhstan 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0 Best: China 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
learning-adjusted years of schooling  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Liberia 0 Best: Singapore 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
educational enabling environment
|
government expenditure on primary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0 Best: Timor-Leste 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Tunisia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0 Best: Croatia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Guatemala 0 Best: Tunisia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Kuwait 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
schools with access to computers in primary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Armenia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
schools with access to computers in secondary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Albania 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
gross enrollment ratio in early childhood education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Yemen 0 Best: Liberia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
proportion of children who are developmentally on track  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Serbia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Gambia 0 Best: Serbia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Armenia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
30.2 |
Worst: Niger 30.2 Best: Czech Republic 100
|
N/AValue: N/A
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mozambique 0 Best: Iceland 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
2.4 |
Worst: Niger 2.4 Best: Austria 100
|
N/AValue: N/A
|
tvet components
|
firms offering formal training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Timor-Leste 0 Best: China 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
Labor force with short-cycle tertiary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Latvia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Viet Nam 0 Best: Paraguay 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
government expenditure on vocational education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Netherlands 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
Share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programs  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Jamaica 0 Best: Bolivia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Israel 0 Best: Australia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
extent of staff training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
79 |
24.1 |
Worst: Mauritania 24.1 Best: Switzerland 79
|
N/AValue: N/A
|
quality of vocational training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
90.8 |
25.6 |
Worst: Angola 25.6 Best: Switzerland 90.8
|
N/AValue: N/A
|
ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Botswana 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Malawi 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
tvet labor market
|
firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: South Africa 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
employment educational mismatch (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0 Best: Romania 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
proportion of skilled production workers  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mauritania 0 Best: South Africa 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
unemployment rate with vocational education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0 Best: Qatar 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
share of tvet occupations  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Qatar 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
manufacturing employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Lesotho 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
enrollment in vocational education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.9 |
5.6 |
Worst: Yemen 5.6 Best: Brunei Darussalam 99.9
|
N/AValue: N/A
|
vulnerable employment rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Qatar 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
inputs (higher education)
|
government expenditure per tertiary student  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: St. Lucia 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Kenya 0 Best: Indonesia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
enrollment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Greece 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
enrollment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: France 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Sudan 0 Best: Lebanon 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
researchers in higher education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mali 0 Best: Senegal 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
learning environment
|
teachers in tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.3 |
0 |
Worst: Myanmar 0 Best: Panama 99.3
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
inbound mobility rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Australia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
academic freedom  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.2 |
4.1 |
Worst: Bahrain 4.1 Best: Uruguay 97.2
|
N/AValue: N/A
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.2 |
31.8 |
Worst: Niger 31.8 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 99.2
|
N/AValue: N/A
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
1 |
Worst: Mozambique 1 Best: Barbados 100
|
N/AValue: N/A
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
46 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: State of Palestine 46
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
outputs (higher education)
|
Educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Lithuania 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Guatemala 0 Best: Georgia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0 Best: Slovenia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
Labor force participation rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Venezuela 0 Best: Tanzania 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
unemployment rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Trinidad and Tobago 0 Best: Myanmar 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
university-industry collaboration in r&d  |
Initial Value: 1
|
78.5 |
16 |
Worst: Angola 16 Best: Israel 78.5
|
N/AValue: N/A
|
citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Cyprus 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
inputs (research, development and innovation)
|
gerd (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Israel 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
gerd per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Botswana 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
researchers per thousand labor force  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Denmark 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
tertiary graduates from stem programs (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Eswatini 0 Best: Gambia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
gerd performed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
gerd financed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Brunei Darussalam 0 Best: Thailand 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
researchers in business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mozambique 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
firms that spend on r&d (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Lesotho 0 Best: Finland 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
high-skilled employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mali 0 Best: United States 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
intellectual property payments (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Armenia 0 Best: Ireland 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
state of cluster development  |
Initial Value: 1
|
74.9 |
23.5 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 23.5 Best: Italy 74.9
|
N/AValue: N/A
|
outputs (research, development and innovation)
|
average documents per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0 Best: Panama 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
citations per document  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Indonesia 0 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Tanzania 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
intellectual property receipts (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: Netherlands 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0 Best: China 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
pct applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Pakistan 0 Best: Barbados 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
firms producing new goods and services (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Egypt 0 Best: Finland 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: China 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
cultural goods exports (% exports)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Algeria 0 Best: St. Lucia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
printing and publishing output (% manufactured output)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0 Best: Kenya 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
impact
|
research institutions prominence  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Albania 0 Best: China 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
growth of innovative companies  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Sierra Leone 0 Best: Belarus 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.8 |
0.4 |
Worst: Jamaica 0.4 Best: Israel 80.8
|
N/AValue: N/A
|
iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Bulgaria 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
gerd financed from abroad (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Algeria 0 Best: Israel 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0 Best: Israel 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
computer software spending (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0 Best: United States 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
new business density per thousand population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Liberia 0 Best: Botswana 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
firms with new product/service (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: St. Lucia 0 Best: Lesotho 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
infrastructure
|
3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Armenia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
secure internet servers per 1 million population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Denmark 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
investment in telecommunication services (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mauritania 0 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
mobile upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
fixed-broadband upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Algeria 0 Best: Singapore 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Switzerland 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Kuwait 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
internet and telephony competition  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Albania 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
access
|
active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
international internet bandwidth per user  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
households with internet access at home (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
individuals with standard ict skills (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Togo 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
tertiary graduates from ict programs (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Eswatini 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
ict employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Israel 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
usage
|
government online services  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: State of Palestine 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Kuwait 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Kuwait 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
internet users (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Indonesia 0 Best: Barbados 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
e-participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: State of Palestine 0 Best: Estonia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
internet activities by individuals (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Denmark 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0 Best: Ireland 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
economic competitiveness
|
gross fixed capital formation (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Iraq 0 Best: Tanzania 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
logistics performance  |
Initial Value: 1
|
80 |
23.7 |
Worst: Afghanistan 23.7 Best: Germany 80
|
N/AValue: N/A
|
transport productive capacity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mauritania 0 Best: Belize 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
building quality control  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
13.3 |
Worst: Liberia 13.3 Best: China 100
|
N/AValue: N/A
|
ease of starting a business  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
52.4 |
Worst: Cambodia 52.4 Best: New Zealand 100
|
N/AValue: N/A
|
insolvency recovery rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Japan 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
entrepreneurial employee activity rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: China 0 Best: Denmark 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
extent of corporate transparency  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Australia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
economic openness
|
trade (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Sudan 0 Best: Ireland 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
high-technology trade (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
product concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.2 |
10.9 |
Worst: Chad 10.9 Best: Croatia 94.2
|
N/AValue: N/A
|
market concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.9 |
45.7 |
Worst: Bhutan 45.7 Best: Ukraine 96.9
|
N/AValue: N/A
|
chinn-ito financial openness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: Australia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: Cyprus 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
debt dynamics  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mozambique 0 Best: Australia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
financing and domestic value added
|
domestic credit to private sector (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
msme financing gap (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Philippines 0 Best: North Macedonia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
tax and contribution rate (% profit)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Argentina 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
bank non-performing loans (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
medium- and high-tech activities value added  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Cambodia 0 Best: Singapore 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
industry and services value added (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Sierra Leone 0 Best: Kuwait 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
labor underutilization rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Benin 0 Best: Thailand 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
output per worker  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
governance
|
peace and stability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.6 |
0.5 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.5 Best: New Zealand 97.6
|
N/AValue: N/A
|
voice and accountability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
3.4 |
Worst: Lao PDR 3.4 Best: Norway 100
|
N/AValue: N/A
|
rule of law  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Venezuela 0 Best: Finland 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
control of corruption  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
1.9 |
Worst: Yemen 1.9 Best: Denmark 100
|
N/AValue: N/A
|
government effectiveness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0.5 |
Worst: Yemen 0.5 Best: Singapore 100
|
N/AValue: N/A
|
socio-economic
|
female-to-male ratio in parliament  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Yemen 0 Best: Mexico 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
female-to-male labor force participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Yemen 0 Best: Burundi 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
female-to-male ratio in internet usage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
52.1 |
Worst: Burundi 52.1 Best: Armenia 100
|
N/AValue: N/A
|
social protection coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Uganda 0 Best: Australia 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
adult literacy rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Ukraine 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
youth not in employment, education or training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Iraq 0 Best: Japan 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
poverty headcount ratio (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: China 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
gdp per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
health and environment
|
universal health coverage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
87 |
28 |
Worst: Chad 28 Best: Australia 87
|
N/AValue: N/A
|
healthy life expectancy (years)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Lesotho 0 Best: Japan 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
under-five mortality rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Nigeria 0 Best: Iceland 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
renewable energy consumption (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bahrain 0 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
ecological footprint per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Luxembourg 0 Best: Yemen 100
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
natural hazard exposure  |
Initial Value: 1
|
95 |
16 |
Worst: Philippines 16 Best: Finland 95
|
N/AValue: N/A
|