KPI  |
2023 - Trinidad and Tobago |
Weight  |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value  |
Current Value |
knowledge capital
Rank 87 / Score 62.03 |
net enrollment rate in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Myanmar 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
net enrollment rate in lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: France 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
net enrollment rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Portugal 100.00
62.9% |
62.9Value: 62.9
|
years of compulsory education in primary and secondary  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Germany 100.00
53.8% |
53.8Value: 53.8
|
completion rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
88.7% |
88.7Value: 88.7
|
gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Mauritius 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
40% |
40Value: 40
|
learning-adjusted years of schooling  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
63.9% |
63.9Value: 63.9
|
educational enabling environment
Rank 68 / Score 64.71 |
government expenditure on primary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
22% |
22Value: 22
|
government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
15% |
15Value: 15
|
government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
23% |
23Value: 23
|
government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
18.5% |
18.5Value: 18.5
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
82.2% |
82.2Value: 82.2
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
91.9% |
91.9Value: 91.9
|
schools with access to computers in primary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
11.6% |
11.6Value: 11.6
|
schools with access to computers in secondary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
99.1% |
99.1Value: 99.1
|
gross enrollment ratio in early childhood education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
60.9% |
60.9Value: 60.9
|
proportion of children who are developmentally on track  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
91.9% |
91.9Value: 91.9
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
46.60 |
Worst: Chad 46.60 Best: Uganda 100.00
84.27% |
91.6Value: 91.6
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.90 |
0.90 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.90 Best: Russian Federation 99.90
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritius 0.00 Best: Austria 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
tvet components
Rank 131 / Score 22.52 |
firms offering formal training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Saudi Arabia 0.00 Best: Ecuador 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
Labor force with short-cycle tertiary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Poland 0.00 Best: Latvia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Sweden 100.00
9% |
9Value: 9
|
government expenditure on vocational education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
19.6% |
19.6Value: 19.6
|
Share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programs  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Saudi Arabia 0.00 Best: Bolivia 100.00
0.7% |
0.7Value: 0.7
|
share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Malta 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
6.1% |
6.1Value: 6.1
|
extent of staff training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.40 |
22.60 |
Worst: Mauritania 22.60 Best: Switzerland 80.40
48.79% |
50.8Value: 50.8
|
quality of vocational training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
89.50 |
21.10 |
Worst: Mauritania 21.10 Best: Switzerland 89.50
40.35% |
48.7Value: 48.7
|
ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0.00 Best: Burundi 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0.00 Best: Burundi 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
tvet labor market
Rank 47 / Score 67.32 |
firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Spain 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
employment educational mismatch (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
55.2% |
55.2Value: 55.2
|
proportion of skilled production workers  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
unemployment rate with vocational education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
89.7% |
89.7Value: 89.7
|
share of tvet occupations  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
79.1% |
79.1Value: 79.1
|
manufacturing employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Czech Republic 100.00
37.5% |
37.5Value: 37.5
|
enrollment in vocational education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
15.00 |
Worst: Oman 15.00 Best: Uganda 100.00
55.29% |
62Value: 62
|
vulnerable employment rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
80.4% |
80.4Value: 80.4
|
inputs (higher education)
Rank 104 / Score 28.23 |
government expenditure per tertiary student  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kyrgyz Republic 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kenya 0.00 Best: Colombia 100.00
0.4% |
0.4Value: 0.4
|
enrollment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Greece 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
enrollment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Suriname 0.00 Best: Norway 100.00
2.8% |
2.8Value: 2.8
|
pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Benin 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
researchers in higher education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Senegal 100.00
81.5% |
81.5Value: 81.5
|
learning environment
Rank 1 / Score 88.6 |
teachers in tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.30 |
0.00 |
Worst: Myanmar 0.00 Best: United States 98.30
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
inbound mobility rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
academic freedom  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.70 |
1.50 |
Worst: Myanmar 1.50 Best: Czech Republic 97.70
90.54% |
88.6Value: 88.6
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
24.50 |
Worst: Tanzania 24.50 Best: Bolivia 100.00
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
48.70 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Dominican Republic 48.70
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.60 |
0.70 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0.70 Best: State of Palestine 98.60
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
outputs (higher education)
Rank 110 / Score 36.51 |
Educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
10.6% |
10.6Value: 10.6
|
educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Guatemala 0.00 Best: Georgia 100.00
6.2% |
6.2Value: 6.2
|
educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: Slovenia 100.00
8% |
8Value: 8
|
Labor force participation rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Ethiopia 100.00
65.3% |
65.3Value: 65.3
|
unemployment rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: State of Palestine 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
92.9% |
92.9Value: 92.9
|
university-industry collaboration in r&d  |
Initial Value: 1
|
79.20 |
20.80 |
Worst: Myanmar 20.80 Best: Switzerland 79.20
22.09% |
33.7Value: 33.7
|
citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
10.6% |
10.6Value: 10.6
|
inputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 98 / Score 20.8 |
gerd (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
1% |
1Value: 1
|
gerd per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
2.3% |
2.3Value: 2.3
|
researchers per thousand labor force  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
9% |
9Value: 9
|
tertiary graduates from stem programs (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Malaysia 100.00
87.9% |
87.9Value: 87.9
|
gerd performed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
0.2% |
0.2Value: 0.2
|
gerd financed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Brunei Darussalam 0.00 Best: Thailand 100.00
16.8% |
16.8Value: 16.8
|
researchers in business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
1.3% |
1.3Value: 1.3
|
firms that spend on r&d (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
high-skilled employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
34.5% |
34.5Value: 34.5
|
intellectual property payments (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Armenia 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
2.9% |
2.9Value: 2.9
|
state of cluster development  |
Initial Value: 1
|
71.80 |
28.70 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 28.70 Best: Saudi Arabia 71.80
34.57% |
43.6Value: 43.6
|
outputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 131 / Score 11.45 |
average documents per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Colombia 100.00
17.4% |
17.4Value: 17.4
|
citations per document  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Indonesia 0.00 Best: Cape Verde 100.00
25.3% |
25.3Value: 25.3
|
patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
12% |
12Value: 12
|
intellectual property receipts (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Armenia 0.00 Best: Malta 100.00
2.6% |
2.6Value: 2.6
|
industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Honduras 0.00 Best: Italy 100.00
2.3% |
2.3Value: 2.3
|
pct applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
2.4% |
2.4Value: 2.4
|
firms producing new goods and services (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Iran, Islamic Rep. 100.00
11.4% |
11.4Value: 11.4
|
cultural goods exports (% exports)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Dominican Republic 100.00
2.4% |
2.4Value: 2.4
|
printing and publishing output (% manufactured output)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Malta 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
impact
Rank 106 / Score 21.84 |
research institutions prominence  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
30.3% |
30.3Value: 30.3
|
growth of innovative companies  |
Initial Value: 1
|
72.50 |
28.70 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 28.70 Best: Israel 72.50
3.42% |
30.2Value: 30.2
|
iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tajikistan 0.00 Best: Belarus 100.00
5.4% |
5.4Value: 5.4
|
iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Bulgaria 100.00
4.4% |
4.4Value: 4.4
|
gerd financed from abroad (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
45.5% |
45.5Value: 45.5
|
joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Iran, Islamic Rep. 0.00 Best: Canada 100.00
13.2% |
13.2Value: 13.2
|
computer software spending (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
new business density per thousand population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Estonia 100.00
18.6% |
18.6Value: 18.6
|
firms with new product/service (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Pakistan 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
infrastructure
Rank 74 / Score 56 |
3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
87.6% |
87.6Value: 87.6
|
secure internet servers per 1 million population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
45.9% |
45.9Value: 45.9
|
investment in telecommunication services (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
27.8% |
27.8Value: 27.8
|
mobile upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
16.4% |
16.4Value: 16.4
|
fixed-broadband upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
23.2% |
23.2Value: 23.2
|
fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Switzerland 100.00
45.6% |
45.6Value: 45.6
|
fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
80.3% |
80.3Value: 80.3
|
mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
77.2% |
77.2Value: 77.2
|
internet and telephony competition  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
access
Rank 23 / Score 56.6 |
active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
15.2% |
15.2Value: 15.2
|
international internet bandwidth per user  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
61% |
61Value: 61
|
households with internet access at home (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Bahrain 100.00
80.4% |
80.4Value: 80.4
|
individuals with standard ict skills (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Togo 0.00 Best: Saudi Arabia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
tertiary graduates from ict programs (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
22% |
22Value: 22
|
ict employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Trinidad and Tobago 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
usage
Rank 75 / Score 39.67 |
government online services  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
9.50 |
Worst: Mauritania 9.50 Best: Estonia 100.00
43.54% |
48.9Value: 48.9
|
fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
38.6% |
38.6Value: 38.6
|
mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
30.2% |
30.2Value: 30.2
|
internet users (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Bahrain 100.00
77.7% |
77.7Value: 77.7
|
ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
2.3% |
2.3Value: 2.3
|
e-participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.90 |
2.30 |
Worst: Mauritania 2.30 Best: Australia 98.90
22.36% |
23.9Value: 23.9
|
internet activities by individuals (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: El Salvador 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Paraguay 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
65.3% |
65.3Value: 65.3
|
economic competitiveness
Rank 78 / Score 50.41 |
gross fixed capital formation (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ukraine 0.00 Best: Mauritania 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
logistics performance  |
Initial Value: 1
|
82.50 |
26.60 |
Worst: Burundi 26.60 Best: Singapore 82.50
19.5% |
37.5Value: 37.5
|
transport productive capacity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Seychelles 100.00
79% |
79Value: 79
|
building quality control  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
23.30 |
Worst: Gambia 23.30 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
56.58% |
66.7Value: 66.7
|
ease of starting a business  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
52.40 |
Worst: Cambodia 52.40 Best: New Zealand 100.00
76.05% |
88.6Value: 88.6
|
insolvency recovery rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Norway 100.00
28.4% |
28.4Value: 28.4
|
entrepreneurial employee activity rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Russian Federation 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
13.4% |
13.4Value: 13.4
|
extent of corporate transparency  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Albania 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
28.6% |
28.6Value: 28.6
|
economic openness
Rank 52 / Score 58 |
trade (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: United States 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
high-technology trade (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Albania 0.00 Best: Malaysia 100.00
12.1% |
12.1Value: 12.1
|
product concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.30 |
14.10 |
Worst: Mali 14.10 Best: Poland 94.30
56.86% |
59.7Value: 59.7
|
market concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.80 |
29.30 |
Worst: Mongolia 29.30 Best: Turkey 96.80
80.3% |
83.5Value: 83.5
|
chinn-ito financial openness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
83.6% |
83.6Value: 83.6
|
foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cyprus 0.00 Best: Hungary 100.00
29.1% |
29.1Value: 29.1
|
debt dynamics  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
80% |
80Value: 80
|
financing and domestic value added
Rank 39 / Score 55.94 |
domestic credit to private sector (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
11.9% |
11.9Value: 11.9
|
msme financing gap (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Philippines 0.00 Best: North Macedonia 100.00
78.8% |
78.8Value: 78.8
|
tax and contribution rate (% profit)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Argentina 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
66.9% |
66.9Value: 66.9
|
bank non-performing loans (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
79.4% |
79.4Value: 79.4
|
medium- and high-tech activities value added  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cambodia 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
48% |
48Value: 48
|
industry and services value added (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
69% |
69Value: 69
|
labor underutilization rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Rwanda 0.00 Best: Cambodia 100.00
71.2% |
71.2Value: 71.2
|
output per worker  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
22.3% |
22.3Value: 22.3
|
governance
Rank 52 / Score 54.21 |
peace and stability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.20 |
1.40 |
Worst: Mali 1.40 Best: Singapore 97.20
57.62% |
56.6Value: 56.6
|
voice and accountability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
1.90 |
Worst: Myanmar 1.90 Best: Norway 100.00
66.46% |
67.1Value: 67.1
|
rule of law  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
3.30 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 3.30 Best: Denmark 100.00
38.57% |
40.6Value: 40.6
|
control of corruption  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
3.30 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 3.30 Best: Singapore 100.00
50.78% |
52.4Value: 52.4
|
government effectiveness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
4.20 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 4.20 Best: Finland 100.00
44.36% |
46.7Value: 46.7
|
socio-economic
Rank 84 / Score 50.99 |
female-to-male ratio in parliament  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
2.40 |
Worst: Oman 2.40 Best: Mexico 100.00
38.52% |
40Value: 40
|
female-to-male labor force participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
22.30 |
Worst: Egypt 22.30 Best: Burundi 100.00
67.05% |
74.4Value: 74.4
|
female-to-male ratio in internet usage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
33.10 |
Worst: Niger 33.10 Best: Armenia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
social protection coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uganda 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
53.9% |
53.9Value: 53.9
|
adult literacy rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Ukraine 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
youth not in employment, education or training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
69.3% |
69.3Value: 69.3
|
poverty headcount ratio (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Ukraine 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
gdp per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
19.9% |
19.9Value: 19.9
|
health and environment
Rank 99 / Score 59.8 |
universal health coverage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
91.00 |
29.40 |
Worst: Chad 29.40 Best: Canada 91.00
74.03% |
75Value: 75
|
healthy life expectancy (years)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
75% |
75Value: 75
|
under-five mortality rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Estonia 100.00
87.3% |
87.3Value: 87.3
|
renewable energy consumption (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bahrain 0.00 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100.00
0.5% |
0.5Value: 0.5
|
ecological footprint per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Luxembourg 0.00 Best: Rwanda 100.00
53% |
53Value: 53
|
natural hazard exposure  |
Initial Value: 1
|
95.00 |
16.00 |
Worst: Philippines 16.00 Best: Finland 95.00
65.82% |
68Value: 68
|