KPI  |
2023 - Uzbekistan |
Weight  |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value  |
Current Value |
knowledge capital
Rank 38 / Score 79.24 |
net enrollment rate in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Myanmar 100.00
91% |
91Value: 91
|
net enrollment rate in lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: France 100.00
99.5% |
99.5Value: 99.5
|
net enrollment rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Portugal 100.00
69.8% |
69.8Value: 69.8
|
years of compulsory education in primary and secondary  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Germany 100.00
92.3% |
92.3Value: 92.3
|
completion rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
96.2% |
96.2Value: 96.2
|
gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Mauritius 100.00
72.4% |
72.4Value: 72.4
|
assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
learning-adjusted years of schooling  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
64% |
64Value: 64
|
educational enabling environment
Rank 32 / Score 75.63 |
government expenditure on primary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
37.1% |
37.1Value: 37.1
|
government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
57% |
57Value: 57
|
government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
55.5% |
55.5Value: 55.5
|
government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
18.3% |
18.3Value: 18.3
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
83.8% |
83.8Value: 83.8
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
93.5% |
93.5Value: 93.5
|
schools with access to computers in primary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
97.7% |
97.7Value: 97.7
|
schools with access to computers in secondary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
97.7% |
97.7Value: 97.7
|
gross enrollment ratio in early childhood education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
40.3% |
40.3Value: 40.3
|
proportion of children who are developmentally on track  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
74.7% |
74.7Value: 74.7
|
proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
95.9% |
95.9Value: 95.9
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
46.60 |
Worst: Chad 46.60 Best: Uganda 100.00
96.63% |
98.2Value: 98.2
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.90 |
0.90 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.90 Best: Russian Federation 99.90
93.03% |
93Value: 93
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritius 0.00 Best: Austria 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
tvet components
Rank 102 / Score 33.98 |
firms offering formal training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Saudi Arabia 0.00 Best: Ecuador 100.00
18.6% |
18.6Value: 18.6
|
Labor force with short-cycle tertiary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Poland 0.00 Best: Latvia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Sweden 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
government expenditure on vocational education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
Share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programs  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Saudi Arabia 0.00 Best: Bolivia 100.00
8.2% |
8.2Value: 8.2
|
share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Malta 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
extent of staff training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.40 |
22.60 |
Worst: Mauritania 22.60 Best: Switzerland 80.40
65.92% |
60.7Value: 60.7
|
quality of vocational training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
89.50 |
21.10 |
Worst: Mauritania 21.10 Best: Switzerland 89.50
51.46% |
56.3Value: 56.3
|
ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0.00 Best: Burundi 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0.00 Best: Burundi 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
tvet labor market
Rank 65 / Score 63.53 |
firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Spain 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
90.1% |
90.1Value: 90.1
|
employment educational mismatch (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
proportion of skilled production workers  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
33.1% |
33.1Value: 33.1
|
unemployment rate with vocational education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
84.1% |
84.1Value: 84.1
|
share of tvet occupations  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
50.1% |
50.1Value: 50.1
|
manufacturing employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Czech Republic 100.00
41.2% |
41.2Value: 41.2
|
enrollment in vocational education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
15.00 |
Worst: Oman 15.00 Best: Uganda 100.00
85.65% |
87.8Value: 87.8
|
vulnerable employment rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
63.9% |
63.9Value: 63.9
|
inputs (higher education)
Rank 93 / Score 33.97 |
government expenditure per tertiary student  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kyrgyz Republic 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
3.1% |
3.1Value: 3.1
|
teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kenya 0.00 Best: Colombia 100.00
74.5% |
74.5Value: 74.5
|
enrollment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Greece 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
enrollment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Suriname 0.00 Best: Norway 100.00
0.2% |
0.2Value: 0.2
|
pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Benin 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
62.7% |
62.7Value: 62.7
|
researchers in higher education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Senegal 100.00
63.1% |
63.1Value: 63.1
|
learning environment
Rank 105 / Score 37.77 |
teachers in tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.30 |
0.00 |
Worst: Myanmar 0.00 Best: United States 98.30
81.79% |
80.4Value: 80.4
|
inbound mobility rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100.00
2.6% |
2.6Value: 2.6
|
academic freedom  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.70 |
1.50 |
Worst: Myanmar 1.50 Best: Czech Republic 97.70
29.94% |
30.3Value: 30.3
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
24.50 |
Worst: Tanzania 24.50 Best: Bolivia 100.00
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
48.70 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Dominican Republic 48.70
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.60 |
0.70 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0.70 Best: State of Palestine 98.60
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
outputs (higher education)
Rank 64 / Score 48.05 |
Educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
34.5% |
34.5Value: 34.5
|
educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Guatemala 0.00 Best: Georgia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: Slovenia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
Labor force participation rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Ethiopia 100.00
67.3% |
67.3Value: 67.3
|
unemployment rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: State of Palestine 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
95.8% |
95.8Value: 95.8
|
university-industry collaboration in r&d  |
Initial Value: 1
|
79.20 |
20.80 |
Worst: Myanmar 20.80 Best: Switzerland 79.20
60.27% |
56Value: 56
|
citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
0.2% |
0.2Value: 0.2
|
inputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 76 / Score 25.44 |
gerd (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
2.3% |
2.3Value: 2.3
|
gerd per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
2.2% |
2.2Value: 2.2
|
researchers per thousand labor force  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
6.6% |
6.6Value: 6.6
|
tertiary graduates from stem programs (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Malaysia 100.00
81.5% |
81.5Value: 81.5
|
gerd performed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
1.2% |
1.2Value: 1.2
|
gerd financed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Brunei Darussalam 0.00 Best: Thailand 100.00
52.5% |
52.5Value: 52.5
|
researchers in business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
15.4% |
15.4Value: 15.4
|
firms that spend on r&d (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
11.9% |
11.9Value: 11.9
|
high-skilled employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
intellectual property payments (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Armenia 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
10.5% |
10.5Value: 10.5
|
state of cluster development  |
Initial Value: 1
|
71.80 |
28.70 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 28.70 Best: Saudi Arabia 71.80
72.39% |
59.9Value: 59.9
|
outputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 107 / Score 18.78 |
average documents per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Colombia 100.00
7.5% |
7.5Value: 7.5
|
citations per document  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Indonesia 0.00 Best: Cape Verde 100.00
17.7% |
17.7Value: 17.7
|
patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
56.6% |
56.6Value: 56.6
|
intellectual property receipts (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Armenia 0.00 Best: Malta 100.00
0.1% |
0.1Value: 0.1
|
industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Honduras 0.00 Best: Italy 100.00
6.3% |
6.3Value: 6.3
|
pct applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
firms producing new goods and services (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
29.9% |
29.9Value: 29.9
|
trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Iran, Islamic Rep. 100.00
26.8% |
26.8Value: 26.8
|
cultural goods exports (% exports)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Dominican Republic 100.00
3.2% |
3.2Value: 3.2
|
printing and publishing output (% manufactured output)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Malta 100.00
4.5% |
4.5Value: 4.5
|
impact
Rank 81 / Score 27.49 |
research institutions prominence  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
54.2% |
54.2Value: 54.2
|
growth of innovative companies  |
Initial Value: 1
|
72.50 |
28.70 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 28.70 Best: Israel 72.50
66.44% |
57.8Value: 57.8
|
iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tajikistan 0.00 Best: Belarus 100.00
10.9% |
10.9Value: 10.9
|
iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Bulgaria 100.00
24.9% |
24.9Value: 24.9
|
gerd financed from abroad (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
0.6% |
0.6Value: 0.6
|
joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Iran, Islamic Rep. 0.00 Best: Canada 100.00
3.2% |
3.2Value: 3.2
|
computer software spending (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
15.3% |
15.3Value: 15.3
|
new business density per thousand population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Estonia 100.00
11.1% |
11.1Value: 11.1
|
firms with new product/service (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Pakistan 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
67.2% |
67.2Value: 67.2
|
infrastructure
Rank 76 / Score 54.98 |
3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
87% |
87Value: 87
|
secure internet servers per 1 million population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
49.1% |
49.1Value: 49.1
|
investment in telecommunication services (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
15.9% |
15.9Value: 15.9
|
mobile upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
5.9% |
5.9Value: 5.9
|
fixed-broadband upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
15.6% |
15.6Value: 15.6
|
fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Switzerland 100.00
45.2% |
45.2Value: 45.2
|
fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
88.4% |
88.4Value: 88.4
|
mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
93.6% |
93.6Value: 93.6
|
internet and telephony competition  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
94.1% |
94.1Value: 94.1
|
access
Rank 68 / Score 40.73 |
active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
42.9% |
42.9Value: 42.9
|
international internet bandwidth per user  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
49.8% |
49.8Value: 49.8
|
households with internet access at home (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Bahrain 100.00
95% |
95Value: 95
|
individuals with standard ict skills (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Togo 0.00 Best: Saudi Arabia 100.00
9% |
9Value: 9
|
tertiary graduates from ict programs (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
28.8% |
28.8Value: 28.8
|
ict employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Trinidad and Tobago 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
usage
Rank 93 / Score 31.65 |
government online services  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
9.50 |
Worst: Mauritania 9.50 Best: Estonia 100.00
71.71% |
74.4Value: 74.4
|
fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
4.4% |
4.4Value: 4.4
|
mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
9.8% |
9.8Value: 9.8
|
internet users (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Bahrain 100.00
75.1% |
75.1Value: 75.1
|
ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
0.4% |
0.4Value: 0.4
|
e-participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.90 |
2.30 |
Worst: Mauritania 2.30 Best: Australia 98.90
61.18% |
61.4Value: 61.4
|
internet activities by individuals (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: El Salvador 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
8% |
8Value: 8
|
trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Paraguay 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
19.7% |
19.7Value: 19.7
|
economic competitiveness
Rank 37 / Score 60.42 |
gross fixed capital formation (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ukraine 0.00 Best: Mauritania 100.00
43.9% |
43.9Value: 43.9
|
logistics performance  |
Initial Value: 1
|
82.50 |
26.60 |
Worst: Burundi 26.60 Best: Singapore 82.50
23.97% |
40Value: 40
|
transport productive capacity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Seychelles 100.00
33.8% |
33.8Value: 33.8
|
building quality control  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
23.30 |
Worst: Gambia 23.30 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
65.19% |
73.3Value: 73.3
|
ease of starting a business  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
52.40 |
Worst: Cambodia 52.40 Best: New Zealand 100.00
92.02% |
96.2Value: 96.2
|
insolvency recovery rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Norway 100.00
37.4% |
37.4Value: 37.4
|
entrepreneurial employee activity rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Russian Federation 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
extent of corporate transparency  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Albania 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
85.7% |
85.7Value: 85.7
|
economic openness
Rank 91 / Score 42.15 |
trade (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: United States 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
12.8% |
12.8Value: 12.8
|
high-technology trade (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Albania 0.00 Best: Malaysia 100.00
23.8% |
23.8Value: 23.8
|
product concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.30 |
14.10 |
Worst: Mali 14.10 Best: Poland 94.30
74.31% |
73.7Value: 73.7
|
market concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.80 |
29.30 |
Worst: Mongolia 29.30 Best: Turkey 96.80
89.04% |
89.4Value: 89.4
|
chinn-ito financial openness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
16.4% |
16.4Value: 16.4
|
foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cyprus 0.00 Best: Hungary 100.00
36.7% |
36.7Value: 36.7
|
debt dynamics  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
50% |
50Value: 50
|
financing and domestic value added
Rank 79 / Score 46.41 |
domestic credit to private sector (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
11.5% |
11.5Value: 11.5
|
msme financing gap (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Philippines 0.00 Best: North Macedonia 100.00
77% |
77Value: 77
|
tax and contribution rate (% profit)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Argentina 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
76% |
76Value: 76
|
bank non-performing loans (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
77.3% |
77.3Value: 77.3
|
medium- and high-tech activities value added  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cambodia 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
21.9% |
21.9Value: 21.9
|
industry and services value added (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
19.4% |
19.4Value: 19.4
|
labor underutilization rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Rwanda 0.00 Best: Cambodia 100.00
79.6% |
79.6Value: 79.6
|
output per worker  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
8.6% |
8.6Value: 8.6
|
governance
Rank 103 / Score 27.12 |
peace and stability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.20 |
1.40 |
Worst: Mali 1.40 Best: Singapore 97.20
39.87% |
39.6Value: 39.6
|
voice and accountability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
1.90 |
Worst: Myanmar 1.90 Best: Norway 100.00
10.91% |
12.6Value: 12.6
|
rule of law  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
3.30 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 3.30 Best: Denmark 100.00
21.92% |
24.5Value: 24.5
|
control of corruption  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
3.30 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 3.30 Best: Singapore 100.00
36.09% |
38.2Value: 38.2
|
government effectiveness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
4.20 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 4.20 Best: Finland 100.00
18.27% |
21.7Value: 21.7
|
socio-economic
Rank 68 / Score 57.48 |
female-to-male ratio in parliament  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
2.40 |
Worst: Oman 2.40 Best: Mexico 100.00
49.28% |
50.5Value: 50.5
|
female-to-male labor force participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
22.30 |
Worst: Egypt 22.30 Best: Burundi 100.00
41.44% |
54.5Value: 54.5
|
female-to-male ratio in internet usage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
33.10 |
Worst: Niger 33.10 Best: Armenia 100.00
85.05% |
90Value: 90
|
social protection coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uganda 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
41% |
41Value: 41
|
adult literacy rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Ukraine 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
youth not in employment, education or training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
51.3% |
51.3Value: 51.3
|
poverty headcount ratio (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Ukraine 100.00
80.3% |
80.3Value: 80.3
|
gdp per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
6.4% |
6.4Value: 6.4
|
health and environment
Rank 88 / Score 61.48 |
universal health coverage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
91.00 |
29.40 |
Worst: Chad 29.40 Best: Canada 91.00
73.7% |
74.8Value: 74.8
|
healthy life expectancy (years)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
69.7% |
69.7Value: 69.7
|
under-five mortality rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Estonia 100.00
89.3% |
89.3Value: 89.3
|
renewable energy consumption (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bahrain 0.00 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100.00
1.1% |
1.1Value: 1.1
|
ecological footprint per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Luxembourg 0.00 Best: Rwanda 100.00
87% |
87Value: 87
|
natural hazard exposure  |
Initial Value: 1
|
95.00 |
16.00 |
Worst: Philippines 16.00 Best: Finland 95.00
39.24% |
47Value: 47
|