KPI |
2021 - South Africa |
Weight |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value |
Current Value |
knowledge capital
Rank 105 / Score 56.28 |
net enrollment rate in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: France 100.00
67.2% |
67.2Value: 67.2
|
net enrollment rate in lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
85.6% |
85.6Value: 85.6
|
net enrollment rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Azerbaijan 100.00
75.8% |
75.8Value: 75.8
|
years of compulsory education in primary and secondary |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Germany 100.00
69.2% |
69.2Value: 69.2
|
completion rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Kazakhstan 100.00
48.5% |
48.5Value: 48.5
|
gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
64.2% |
64.2Value: 64.2
|
assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: China 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
learning-adjusted years of schooling |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Liberia 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
32% |
32Value: 32
|
educational enabling environment
Rank 94 / Score 55.88 |
government expenditure on primary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Timor-Leste 100.00
57.6% |
57.6Value: 57.6
|
government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
39.3% |
39.3Value: 39.3
|
government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Croatia 100.00
52.3% |
52.3Value: 52.3
|
government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Guatemala 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
45.1% |
45.1Value: 45.1
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Malawi 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
66.4% |
66.4Value: 66.4
|
schools with access to computers in primary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
schools with access to computers in secondary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
16.5% |
16.5Value: 16.5
|
gross enrollment ratio in early childhood education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Yemen 0.00 Best: Liberia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
proportion of children who are developmentally on track |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
30.20 |
Worst: Niger 30.20 Best: Czech Republic 100.00
81.23% |
86.9Value: 86.9
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Iceland 100.00
26.2% |
26.2Value: 26.2
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
2.40 |
Worst: Niger 2.40 Best: Austria 100.00
60.25% |
61.2Value: 61.2
|
tvet components
Rank 83 / Score 43.17 |
firms offering formal training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Timor-Leste 0.00 Best: China 100.00
7.8% |
7.8Value: 7.8
|
Labor force with short-cycle tertiary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Latvia 100.00
80.9% |
80.9Value: 80.9
|
participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Viet Nam 0.00 Best: Paraguay 100.00
3.2% |
3.2Value: 3.2
|
government expenditure on vocational education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
19.7% |
19.7Value: 19.7
|
Share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programs |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Jamaica 0.00 Best: Bolivia 100.00
11.1% |
11.1Value: 11.1
|
share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Israel 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
extent of staff training |
Initial Value: 1
|
79.00 |
24.10 |
Worst: Mauritania 24.10 Best: Switzerland 79.00
61.75% |
58Value: 58
|
quality of vocational training |
Initial Value: 1
|
90.80 |
25.60 |
Worst: Angola 25.60 Best: Switzerland 90.80
23.62% |
41Value: 41
|
ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Botswana 100.00
58.2% |
58.2Value: 58.2
|
ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Malawi 100.00
63.9% |
63.9Value: 63.9
|
tvet labor market
Rank 47 / Score 67.4 |
firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
employment educational mismatch (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0.00 Best: Romania 100.00
61.7% |
61.7Value: 61.7
|
proportion of skilled production workers |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
unemployment rate with vocational education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
22.3% |
22.3Value: 22.3
|
share of tvet occupations |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
62.8% |
62.8Value: 62.8
|
manufacturing employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
34% |
34Value: 34
|
enrollment in vocational education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.90 |
5.60 |
Worst: Yemen 5.60 Best: Brunei Darussalam 99.90
75.5% |
76.8Value: 76.8
|
vulnerable employment rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
88.8% |
88.8Value: 88.8
|
inputs (higher education)
Rank 89 / Score 35.77 |
government expenditure per tertiary student |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: St. Lucia 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
25.3% |
25.3Value: 25.3
|
teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kenya 0.00 Best: Indonesia 100.00
29.1% |
29.1Value: 29.1
|
enrollment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Greece 100.00
10.4% |
10.4Value: 10.4
|
enrollment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: France 100.00
5.8% |
5.8Value: 5.8
|
pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Sudan 0.00 Best: Lebanon 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
researchers in higher education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Senegal 100.00
72% |
72Value: 72
|
learning environment
Rank 107 / Score 41.89 |
teachers in tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.30 |
0.00 |
Worst: Myanmar 0.00 Best: Panama 99.30
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
inbound mobility rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
12.2% |
12.2Value: 12.2
|
academic freedom |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.20 |
4.10 |
Worst: Bahrain 4.10 Best: Uruguay 97.20
78.41% |
77.1Value: 77.1
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.20 |
31.80 |
Worst: Niger 31.80 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 99.20
46.14% |
62.9Value: 62.9
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
1.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 1.00 Best: Barbados 100.00
41.31% |
41.9Value: 41.9
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
46.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: State of Palestine 46.00
27.39% |
12.6Value: 12.6
|
outputs (higher education)
Rank 99 / Score 44.11 |
Educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Lithuania 100.00
19.1% |
19.1Value: 19.1
|
educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Guatemala 0.00 Best: Georgia 100.00
8.1% |
8.1Value: 8.1
|
educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: Slovenia 100.00
32.9% |
32.9Value: 32.9
|
Labor force participation rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Venezuela 0.00 Best: Tanzania 100.00
76.8% |
76.8Value: 76.8
|
unemployment rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Trinidad and Tobago 0.00 Best: Myanmar 100.00
56.1% |
56.1Value: 56.1
|
university-industry collaboration in r&d |
Initial Value: 1
|
78.50 |
16.00 |
Worst: Angola 16.00 Best: Israel 78.50
61.92% |
54.7Value: 54.7
|
citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
37% |
37Value: 37
|
inputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 53 / Score 31.72 |
gerd (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
16.7% |
16.7Value: 16.7
|
gerd per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Botswana 100.00
40.9% |
40.9Value: 40.9
|
researchers per thousand labor force |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
8.2% |
8.2Value: 8.2
|
tertiary graduates from stem programs (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Gambia 100.00
33.9% |
33.9Value: 33.9
|
gerd performed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
9.4% |
9.4Value: 9.4
|
gerd financed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Brunei Darussalam 0.00 Best: Thailand 100.00
51.3% |
51.3Value: 51.3
|
researchers in business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
22.4% |
22.4Value: 22.4
|
firms that spend on r&d (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
46.5% |
46.5Value: 46.5
|
high-skilled employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
intellectual property payments (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Armenia 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
34.2% |
34.2Value: 34.2
|
state of cluster development |
Initial Value: 1
|
74.90 |
23.50 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 23.50 Best: Italy 74.90
61.48% |
55.1Value: 55.1
|
outputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 60 / Score 37.14 |
average documents per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0.00 Best: Panama 100.00
67.3% |
67.3Value: 67.3
|
citations per document |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Indonesia 0.00 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100.00
21.9% |
21.9Value: 21.9
|
patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
49.5% |
49.5Value: 49.5
|
intellectual property receipts (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
14.7% |
14.7Value: 14.7
|
industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: China 100.00
8.6% |
8.6Value: 8.6
|
pct applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Pakistan 0.00 Best: Barbados 100.00
63.6% |
63.6Value: 63.6
|
firms producing new goods and services (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Egypt 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
3% |
3Value: 3
|
trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: China 100.00
22.4% |
22.4Value: 22.4
|
cultural goods exports (% exports) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Algeria 0.00 Best: St. Lucia 100.00
14.6% |
14.6Value: 14.6
|
printing and publishing output (% manufactured output) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Myanmar 100.00
63.8% |
63.8Value: 63.8
|
impact
Rank 44 / Score 35.96 |
research institutions prominence |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Albania 0.00 Best: China 100.00
29.3% |
29.3Value: 29.3
|
growth of innovative companies |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Sierra Leone 0.00 Best: Belarus 100.00
18.2% |
18.2Value: 18.2
|
iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.80 |
0.40 |
Worst: Jamaica 0.40 Best: Israel 80.80
69.15% |
56Value: 56
|
iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Bulgaria 100.00
11% |
11Value: 11
|
gerd financed from abroad (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Algeria 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
19.3% |
19.3Value: 19.3
|
joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
18.1% |
18.1Value: 18.1
|
computer software spending (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
32.8% |
32.8Value: 32.8
|
new business density per thousand population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Liberia 0.00 Best: Botswana 100.00
50.8% |
50.8Value: 50.8
|
firms with new product/service (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: St. Lucia 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
60.9% |
60.9Value: 60.9
|
infrastructure
Rank 95 / Score 40.51 |
3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
97.9% |
97.9Value: 97.9
|
secure internet servers per 1 million population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
22.6% |
22.6Value: 22.6
|
investment in telecommunication services (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100.00
32.5% |
32.5Value: 32.5
|
mobile upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
28.3% |
28.3Value: 28.3
|
fixed-broadband upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Algeria 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
12.1% |
12.1Value: 12.1
|
fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Switzerland 100.00
3.7% |
3.7Value: 3.7
|
fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
68.4% |
68.4Value: 68.4
|
mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
49.1% |
49.1Value: 49.1
|
internet and telephony competition |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
50% |
50Value: 50
|
access
Rank 85 / Score 35.56 |
active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
48.7% |
48.7Value: 48.7
|
international internet bandwidth per user |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
32.6% |
32.6Value: 32.6
|
households with internet access at home (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
63.3% |
63.3Value: 63.3
|
individuals with standard ict skills (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Togo 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
11.7% |
11.7Value: 11.7
|
tertiary graduates from ict programs (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
21.5% |
21.5Value: 21.5
|
ict employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
usage
Rank 68 / Score 50.58 |
government online services |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Hong Kong SAR 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
74.7% |
74.7Value: 74.7
|
fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
33.3% |
33.3Value: 33.3
|
mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
5.7% |
5.7Value: 5.7
|
internet users (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
66.5% |
66.5Value: 66.5
|
ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Indonesia 0.00 Best: Barbados 100.00
48.2% |
48.2Value: 48.2
|
e-participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Hong Kong SAR 0.00 Best: Estonia 100.00
75% |
75Value: 75
|
internet activities by individuals (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
45.1% |
45.1Value: 45.1
|
economic competitiveness
Rank 93 / Score 47.31 |
gross fixed capital formation (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Iraq 0.00 Best: Tanzania 100.00
23.6% |
23.6Value: 23.6
|
logistics performance |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.00 |
23.70 |
Worst: Afghanistan 23.70 Best: Germany 80.00
63.41% |
59.4Value: 59.4
|
transport productive capacity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: Belize 100.00
23.4% |
23.4Value: 23.4
|
building quality control |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
13.30 |
Worst: Liberia 13.30 Best: China 100.00
76.93% |
80Value: 80
|
ease of starting a business |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
52.40 |
Worst: Cambodia 52.40 Best: New Zealand 100.00
60.5% |
81.2Value: 81.2
|
insolvency recovery rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Japan 100.00
37.7% |
37.7Value: 37.7
|
entrepreneurial employee activity rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: China 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
1.8% |
1.8Value: 1.8
|
extent of corporate transparency |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
71.4% |
71.4Value: 71.4
|
economic openness
Rank 87 / Score 52.14 |
trade (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Sudan 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
21.4% |
21.4Value: 21.4
|
high-technology trade (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
45.7% |
45.7Value: 45.7
|
product concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.20 |
10.90 |
Worst: Chad 10.90 Best: Croatia 94.20
88.24% |
84.4Value: 84.4
|
market concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.90 |
45.70 |
Worst: Bhutan 45.70 Best: Ukraine 96.90
91.8% |
92.7Value: 92.7
|
chinn-ito financial openness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
16.4% |
16.4Value: 16.4
|
foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
33.9% |
33.9Value: 33.9
|
debt dynamics |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
79.4% |
79.4Value: 79.4
|
financing and domestic value added
Rank 75 / Score 50.28 |
domestic credit to private sector (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
49.3% |
49.3Value: 49.3
|
msme financing gap (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Philippines 0.00 Best: North Macedonia 100.00
82% |
82Value: 82
|
tax and contribution rate (% profit) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Argentina 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
78.4% |
78.4Value: 78.4
|
bank non-performing loans (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
78.6% |
78.6Value: 78.6
|
medium- and high-tech activities value added |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cambodia 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
28.5% |
28.5Value: 28.5
|
industry and services value added (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Sierra Leone 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
65.7% |
65.7Value: 65.7
|
labor underutilization rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Benin 0.00 Best: Thailand 100.00
2.2% |
2.2Value: 2.2
|
output per worker |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
17.5% |
17.5Value: 17.5
|
governance
Rank 56 / Score 56.25 |
peace and stability |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.60 |
0.50 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.50 Best: New Zealand 97.60
41.3% |
40.6Value: 40.6
|
voice and accountability |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
3.40 |
Worst: Lao PDR 3.40 Best: Norway 100.00
68.94% |
70Value: 70
|
rule of law |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Venezuela 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
49.5% |
49.5Value: 49.5
|
control of corruption |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
1.90 |
Worst: Yemen 1.90 Best: Denmark 100.00
58.31% |
59.1Value: 59.1
|
government effectiveness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.50 |
Worst: Yemen 0.50 Best: Singapore 100.00
62.81% |
63Value: 63
|
socio-economic
Rank 93 / Score 51.39 |
female-to-male ratio in parliament |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Yemen 0.00 Best: Mexico 100.00
86.4% |
86.4Value: 86.4
|
female-to-male labor force participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Yemen 0.00 Best: Burundi 100.00
76.9% |
76.9Value: 76.9
|
female-to-male ratio in internet usage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
52.10 |
Worst: Burundi 52.10 Best: Armenia 100.00
|
NAValue: NA
|
social protection coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uganda 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
47.8% |
47.8Value: 47.8
|
adult literacy rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Ukraine 100.00
93.6% |
93.6Value: 93.6
|
youth not in employment, education or training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Iraq 0.00 Best: Japan 100.00
28.9% |
28.9Value: 28.9
|
poverty headcount ratio (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: China 100.00
21.7% |
21.7Value: 21.7
|
gdp per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
9.8% |
9.8Value: 9.8
|
health and environment
Rank 140 / Score 53.42 |
universal health coverage |
Initial Value: 1
|
87.00 |
28.00 |
Worst: Chad 28.00 Best: Australia 87.00
69.49% |
69Value: 69
|
healthy life expectancy (years) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Japan 100.00
39.9% |
39.9Value: 39.9
|
under-five mortality rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Nigeria 0.00 Best: Iceland 100.00
71.8% |
71.8Value: 71.8
|
renewable energy consumption (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bahrain 0.00 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100.00
10.7% |
10.7Value: 10.7
|
ecological footprint per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Luxembourg 0.00 Best: Yemen 100.00
79.1% |
79.1Value: 79.1
|
natural hazard exposure |
Initial Value: 1
|
95.00 |
16.00 |
Worst: Philippines 16.00 Best: Finland 95.00
43.04% |
50Value: 50
|