KPI  |
2023 - Burundi |
Weight  |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value  |
Current Value |
knowledge capital
Rank 129 / Score 25.64 |
net enrollment rate in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Myanmar 100.00
55% |
55Value: 55
|
net enrollment rate in lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: France 100.00
43.1% |
43.1Value: 43.1
|
net enrollment rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Portugal 100.00
33.4% |
33.4Value: 33.4
|
years of compulsory education in primary and secondary  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Germany 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
completion rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
7.1% |
7.1Value: 7.1
|
gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Mauritius 100.00
16.3% |
16.3Value: 16.3
|
assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
learning-adjusted years of schooling  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
25.3% |
25.3Value: 25.3
|
educational enabling environment
Rank 120 / Score 38.03 |
government expenditure on primary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
66.7% |
66.7Value: 66.7
|
government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
31.6% |
31.6Value: 31.6
|
government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
35.4% |
35.4Value: 35.4
|
government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
60% |
60Value: 60
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
56.3% |
56.3Value: 56.3
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
78.3% |
78.3Value: 78.3
|
schools with access to computers in primary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
schools with access to computers in secondary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
1.7% |
1.7Value: 1.7
|
gross enrollment ratio in early childhood education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
10.1% |
10.1Value: 10.1
|
proportion of children who are developmentally on track  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
52.9% |
52.9Value: 52.9
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
56.1% |
56.1Value: 56.1
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
46.60 |
Worst: Chad 46.60 Best: Uganda 100.00
91.76% |
95.6Value: 95.6
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.90 |
0.90 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.90 Best: Russian Federation 99.90
2.63% |
3.5Value: 3.5
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritius 0.00 Best: Austria 100.00
20.4% |
20.4Value: 20.4
|
tvet components
Rank 48 / Score 45.35 |
firms offering formal training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Saudi Arabia 0.00 Best: Ecuador 100.00
40.3% |
40.3Value: 40.3
|
Labor force with short-cycle tertiary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Poland 0.00 Best: Latvia 100.00
86% |
86Value: 86
|
participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Sweden 100.00
17.6% |
17.6Value: 17.6
|
government expenditure on vocational education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
Share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programs  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Saudi Arabia 0.00 Best: Bolivia 100.00
15% |
15Value: 15
|
share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Malta 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
extent of staff training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.40 |
22.60 |
Worst: Mauritania 22.60 Best: Switzerland 80.40
35.99% |
43.4Value: 43.4
|
quality of vocational training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
89.50 |
21.10 |
Worst: Mauritania 21.10 Best: Switzerland 89.50
40.64% |
48.9Value: 48.9
|
ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0.00 Best: Burundi 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0.00 Best: Burundi 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
tvet labor market
Rank 128 / Score 32.34 |
firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Spain 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
84.3% |
84.3Value: 84.3
|
employment educational mismatch (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
proportion of skilled production workers  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
7.4% |
7.4Value: 7.4
|
unemployment rate with vocational education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
37.7% |
37.7Value: 37.7
|
share of tvet occupations  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
1.1% |
1.1Value: 1.1
|
manufacturing employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Czech Republic 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
enrollment in vocational education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
15.00 |
Worst: Oman 15.00 Best: Uganda 100.00
98.71% |
98.9Value: 98.9
|
vulnerable employment rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
7.8% |
7.8Value: 7.8
|
inputs (higher education)
Rank 78 / Score 36.73 |
government expenditure per tertiary student  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kyrgyz Republic 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
7.2% |
7.2Value: 7.2
|
teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kenya 0.00 Best: Colombia 100.00
52.1% |
52.1Value: 52.1
|
enrollment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Greece 100.00
2.7% |
2.7Value: 2.7
|
enrollment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Suriname 0.00 Best: Norway 100.00
0.6% |
0.6Value: 0.6
|
pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Benin 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
84% |
84Value: 84
|
researchers in higher education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Senegal 100.00
73.8% |
73.8Value: 73.8
|
learning environment
Rank 61 / Score 52.65 |
teachers in tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.30 |
0.00 |
Worst: Myanmar 0.00 Best: United States 98.30
17.09% |
16.8Value: 16.8
|
inbound mobility rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100.00
16.7% |
16.7Value: 16.7
|
academic freedom  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.70 |
1.50 |
Worst: Myanmar 1.50 Best: Czech Republic 97.70
25.36% |
25.9Value: 25.9
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
24.50 |
Worst: Tanzania 24.50 Best: Bolivia 100.00
80.79% |
85.5Value: 85.5
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
48.70 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Dominican Republic 48.70
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.60 |
0.70 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0.70 Best: State of Palestine 98.60
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
outputs (higher education)
Rank 127 / Score 27.42 |
Educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Guatemala 0.00 Best: Georgia 100.00
0.4% |
0.4Value: 0.4
|
educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: Slovenia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
Labor force participation rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Ethiopia 100.00
46.2% |
46.2Value: 46.2
|
unemployment rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: State of Palestine 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
69.5% |
69.5Value: 69.5
|
university-industry collaboration in r&d  |
Initial Value: 1
|
79.20 |
20.80 |
Worst: Myanmar 20.80 Best: Switzerland 79.20
30.48% |
38.6Value: 38.6
|
citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
9.8% |
9.8Value: 9.8
|
inputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 120 / Score 14.99 |
gerd (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
3.8% |
3.8Value: 3.8
|
gerd per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
7.5% |
7.5Value: 7.5
|
researchers per thousand labor force  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
0.2% |
0.2Value: 0.2
|
tertiary graduates from stem programs (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Malaysia 100.00
48.9% |
48.9Value: 48.9
|
gerd performed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
0.4% |
0.4Value: 0.4
|
gerd financed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Brunei Darussalam 0.00 Best: Thailand 100.00
10.9% |
10.9Value: 10.9
|
researchers in business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
1.5% |
1.5Value: 1.5
|
firms that spend on r&d (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
48.6% |
48.6Value: 48.6
|
high-skilled employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
2.2% |
2.2Value: 2.2
|
intellectual property payments (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Armenia 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
state of cluster development  |
Initial Value: 1
|
71.80 |
28.70 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 28.70 Best: Saudi Arabia 71.80
28.54% |
41Value: 41
|
outputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 116 / Score 17.33 |
average documents per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Colombia 100.00
10.8% |
10.8Value: 10.8
|
citations per document  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Indonesia 0.00 Best: Cape Verde 100.00
22.6% |
22.6Value: 22.6
|
patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
35% |
35Value: 35
|
intellectual property receipts (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Armenia 0.00 Best: Malta 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Honduras 0.00 Best: Italy 100.00
1.8% |
1.8Value: 1.8
|
pct applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
5.1% |
5.1Value: 5.1
|
firms producing new goods and services (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
58% |
58Value: 58
|
trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Iran, Islamic Rep. 100.00
2.9% |
2.9Value: 2.9
|
cultural goods exports (% exports)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Dominican Republic 100.00
1.5% |
1.5Value: 1.5
|
printing and publishing output (% manufactured output)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Malta 100.00
18.1% |
18.1Value: 18.1
|
impact
Rank 59 / Score 31.52 |
research institutions prominence  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
growth of innovative companies  |
Initial Value: 1
|
72.50 |
28.70 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 28.70 Best: Israel 72.50
36.3% |
44.6Value: 44.6
|
iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tajikistan 0.00 Best: Belarus 100.00
3.3% |
3.3Value: 3.3
|
iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Bulgaria 100.00
3.8% |
3.8Value: 3.8
|
gerd financed from abroad (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Iran, Islamic Rep. 0.00 Best: Canada 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
computer software spending (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
5.5% |
5.5Value: 5.5
|
new business density per thousand population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Estonia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
firms with new product/service (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Pakistan 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
78.9% |
78.9Value: 78.9
|
infrastructure
Rank 132 / Score 17.31 |
3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
27.2% |
27.2Value: 27.2
|
secure internet servers per 1 million population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
16.8% |
16.8Value: 16.8
|
investment in telecommunication services (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
12% |
12Value: 12
|
mobile upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
5.7% |
5.7Value: 5.7
|
fixed-broadband upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Switzerland 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
internet and telephony competition  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
94.1% |
94.1Value: 94.1
|
access
Rank 120 / Score 18.2 |
active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
1.4% |
1.4Value: 1.4
|
international internet bandwidth per user  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
33.3% |
33.3Value: 33.3
|
households with internet access at home (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Bahrain 100.00
16.9% |
16.9Value: 16.9
|
individuals with standard ict skills (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Togo 0.00 Best: Saudi Arabia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
tertiary graduates from ict programs (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
37.6% |
37.6Value: 37.6
|
ict employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Trinidad and Tobago 100.00
0.8% |
0.8Value: 0.8
|
usage
Rank 129 / Score 17.66 |
government online services  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
9.50 |
Worst: Mauritania 9.50 Best: Estonia 100.00
26.85% |
33.8Value: 33.8
|
fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
14% |
14Value: 14
|
mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
0.1% |
0.1Value: 0.1
|
internet users (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Bahrain 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
e-participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.90 |
2.30 |
Worst: Mauritania 2.30 Best: Australia 98.90
32.92% |
34.1Value: 34.1
|
internet activities by individuals (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: El Salvador 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Paraguay 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
12.6% |
12.6Value: 12.6
|
economic competitiveness
Rank 131 / Score 29.32 |
gross fixed capital formation (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ukraine 0.00 Best: Mauritania 100.00
3.8% |
3.8Value: 3.8
|
logistics performance  |
Initial Value: 1
|
82.50 |
26.60 |
Worst: Burundi 26.60 Best: Singapore 82.50
0% |
26.6Value: 26.6
|
transport productive capacity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Seychelles 100.00
36.1% |
36.1Value: 36.1
|
building quality control  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
23.30 |
Worst: Gambia 23.30 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
13.04% |
33.3Value: 33.3
|
ease of starting a business  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
52.40 |
Worst: Cambodia 52.40 Best: New Zealand 100.00
85.08% |
92.9Value: 92.9
|
insolvency recovery rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Norway 100.00
8.2% |
8.2Value: 8.2
|
entrepreneurial employee activity rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Russian Federation 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
extent of corporate transparency  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Albania 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
economic openness
Rank 132 / Score 27 |
trade (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: United States 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
0.8% |
0.8Value: 0.8
|
high-technology trade (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Albania 0.00 Best: Malaysia 100.00
15.6% |
15.6Value: 15.6
|
product concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.30 |
14.10 |
Worst: Mali 14.10 Best: Poland 94.30
57.48% |
60.2Value: 60.2
|
market concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.80 |
29.30 |
Worst: Mongolia 29.30 Best: Turkey 96.80
70.37% |
76.8Value: 76.8
|
chinn-ito financial openness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cyprus 0.00 Best: Hungary 100.00
31.3% |
31.3Value: 31.3
|
debt dynamics  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
financing and domestic value added
Rank 124 / Score 31.71 |
domestic credit to private sector (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
14.8% |
14.8Value: 14.8
|
msme financing gap (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Philippines 0.00 Best: North Macedonia 100.00
79.3% |
79.3Value: 79.3
|
tax and contribution rate (% profit)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Argentina 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
66.2% |
66.2Value: 66.2
|
bank non-performing loans (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
4.2% |
4.2Value: 4.2
|
medium- and high-tech activities value added  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cambodia 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
3.1% |
3.1Value: 3.1
|
industry and services value added (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
0.7% |
0.7Value: 0.7
|
labor underutilization rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Rwanda 0.00 Best: Cambodia 100.00
85.4% |
85.4Value: 85.4
|
output per worker  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
governance
Rank 130 / Score 9.91 |
peace and stability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.20 |
1.40 |
Worst: Mali 1.40 Best: Singapore 97.20
11.8% |
12.7Value: 12.7
|
voice and accountability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
1.90 |
Worst: Myanmar 1.90 Best: Norway 100.00
8.87% |
10.6Value: 10.6
|
rule of law  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
3.30 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 3.30 Best: Denmark 100.00
0.93% |
4.2Value: 4.2
|
control of corruption  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
3.30 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 3.30 Best: Singapore 100.00
7.34% |
10.4Value: 10.4
|
government effectiveness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
4.20 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 4.20 Best: Finland 100.00
5.95% |
9.9Value: 9.9
|
socio-economic
Rank 103 / Score 46.87 |
female-to-male ratio in parliament  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
2.40 |
Worst: Oman 2.40 Best: Mexico 100.00
60.86% |
61.8Value: 61.8
|
female-to-male labor force participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
22.30 |
Worst: Egypt 22.30 Best: Burundi 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
female-to-male ratio in internet usage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
33.10 |
Worst: Niger 33.10 Best: Armenia 100.00
7.77% |
38.3Value: 38.3
|
social protection coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uganda 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
adult literacy rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Ukraine 100.00
66.4% |
66.4Value: 66.4
|
youth not in employment, education or training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
81.4% |
81.4Value: 81.4
|
poverty headcount ratio (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Ukraine 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
gdp per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
health and environment
Rank 73 / Score 64.28 |
universal health coverage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
91.00 |
29.40 |
Worst: Chad 29.40 Best: Canada 91.00
19.64% |
41.5Value: 41.5
|
healthy life expectancy (years)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
38.7% |
38.7Value: 38.7
|
under-five mortality rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Estonia 100.00
55.3% |
55.3Value: 55.3
|
renewable energy consumption (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bahrain 0.00 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100.00
86.6% |
86.6Value: 86.6
|
ecological footprint per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Luxembourg 0.00 Best: Rwanda 100.00
99.6% |
99.6Value: 99.6
|
natural hazard exposure  |
Initial Value: 1
|
95.00 |
16.00 |
Worst: Philippines 16.00 Best: Finland 95.00
60.76% |
64Value: 64
|