KPI  |
2021 |
Weight  |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value  |
El Salvador |
knowledge capital
Rank 101 / Score 57.77 |
net enrollment rate in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mali 0 Best: France 100
52% |
52Value: 52
|
net enrollment rate in lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Tanzania 0 Best: Israel 100
69.7% |
69.7Value: 69.7
|
net enrollment rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Azerbaijan 100
53.1% |
53.1Value: 53.1
|
years of compulsory education in primary and secondary  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Germany 100
69.2% |
69.2Value: 69.2
|
completion rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Kazakhstan 100
61% |
61Value: 61
|
gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
61.3% |
61.3Value: 61.3
|
assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0 Best: China 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
learning-adjusted years of schooling  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Liberia 0 Best: Singapore 100
51.2% |
51.2Value: 51.2
|
educational enabling environment
Rank 96 / Score 54.64 |
government expenditure on primary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0 Best: Timor-Leste 100
36.9% |
36.9Value: 36.9
|
government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Tunisia 100
20.5% |
20.5Value: 20.5
|
government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0 Best: Croatia 100
36.5% |
36.5Value: 36.5
|
government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Guatemala 0 Best: Tunisia 100
17.4% |
17.4Value: 17.4
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Kuwait 100
77.7% |
77.7Value: 77.7
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
61% |
61Value: 61
|
schools with access to computers in primary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Armenia 100
61% |
61Value: 61
|
schools with access to computers in secondary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Albania 100
83.4% |
83.4Value: 83.4
|
gross enrollment ratio in early childhood education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Yemen 0 Best: Liberia 100
23.5% |
23.5Value: 23.5
|
proportion of children who are developmentally on track  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Serbia 100
71.9% |
71.9Value: 71.9
|
proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Gambia 0 Best: Serbia 100
54.2% |
54.2Value: 54.2
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Armenia 100
77.7% |
77.7Value: 77.7
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
30.2 |
Worst: Niger 30.2 Best: Czech Republic 100
94.99% |
96.5Value: 96.5
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mozambique 0 Best: Iceland 100
34.8% |
34.8Value: 34.8
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
2.4 |
Worst: Niger 2.4 Best: Austria 100
57.07% |
58.1Value: 58.1
|
tvet components
Rank 129 / Score 31.8 |
firms offering formal training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Timor-Leste 0 Best: China 100
67.1% |
67.1Value: 67.1
|
Labor force with short-cycle tertiary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Latvia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Viet Nam 0 Best: Paraguay 100
2.5% |
2.5Value: 2.5
|
government expenditure on vocational education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Netherlands 100
0% |
0Value: 0
|
Share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programs  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Jamaica 0 Best: Bolivia 100
27.5% |
27.5Value: 27.5
|
share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Israel 0 Best: Australia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
extent of staff training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
79 |
24.1 |
Worst: Mauritania 24.1 Best: Switzerland 79
34.61% |
43.1Value: 43.1
|
quality of vocational training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
90.8 |
25.6 |
Worst: Angola 25.6 Best: Switzerland 90.8
28.53% |
44.2Value: 44.2
|
ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Botswana 100
45.5% |
45.5Value: 45.5
|
ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Malawi 100
54.6% |
54.6Value: 54.6
|
tvet labor market
Rank 65 / Score 61.74 |
firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: South Africa 100
52.4% |
52.4Value: 52.4
|
employment educational mismatch (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0 Best: Romania 100
55.3% |
55.3Value: 55.3
|
proportion of skilled production workers  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mauritania 0 Best: South Africa 100
56.3% |
56.3Value: 56.3
|
unemployment rate with vocational education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0 Best: Qatar 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
share of tvet occupations  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Qatar 100
47.3% |
47.3Value: 47.3
|
manufacturing employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Lesotho 100
56.2% |
56.2Value: 56.2
|
enrollment in vocational education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.9 |
5.6 |
Worst: Yemen 5.6 Best: Brunei Darussalam 99.9
93.96% |
94.2Value: 94.2
|
vulnerable employment rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Qatar 100
63.4% |
63.4Value: 63.4
|
inputs (higher education)
Rank 116 / Score 28.62 |
government expenditure per tertiary student  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: St. Lucia 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
3.5% |
3.5Value: 3.5
|
teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Kenya 0 Best: Indonesia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
enrollment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Greece 100
17.6% |
17.6Value: 17.6
|
enrollment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: France 100
11.8% |
11.8Value: 11.8
|
pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Sudan 0 Best: Lebanon 100
71% |
71Value: 71
|
researchers in higher education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mali 0 Best: Senegal 100
64.3% |
64.3Value: 64.3
|
learning environment
Rank 93 / Score 45.45 |
teachers in tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.3 |
0 |
Worst: Myanmar 0 Best: Panama 99.3
62.74% |
62.3Value: 62.3
|
inbound mobility rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Australia 100
1.8% |
1.8Value: 1.8
|
academic freedom  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.2 |
4.1 |
Worst: Bahrain 4.1 Best: Uruguay 97.2
75.83% |
74.7Value: 74.7
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.2 |
31.8 |
Worst: Niger 31.8 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 99.2
91.69% |
93.6Value: 93.6
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
1 |
Worst: Mozambique 1 Best: Barbados 100
28.08% |
28.8Value: 28.8
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
46 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: State of Palestine 46
25% |
11.5Value: 11.5
|
outputs (higher education)
Rank 128 / Score 33.66 |
Educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Lithuania 100
20% |
20Value: 20
|
educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Guatemala 0 Best: Georgia 100
0.8% |
0.8Value: 0.8
|
educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0 Best: Slovenia 100
1.9% |
1.9Value: 1.9
|
Labor force participation rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Venezuela 0 Best: Tanzania 100
73.4% |
73.4Value: 73.4
|
unemployment rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Trinidad and Tobago 0 Best: Myanmar 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
university-industry collaboration in r&d  |
Initial Value: 1
|
78.5 |
16 |
Worst: Angola 16 Best: Israel 78.5
17.92% |
27.2Value: 27.2
|
citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Cyprus 100
12.8% |
12.8Value: 12.8
|
inputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 105 / Score 21.43 |
gerd (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Israel 100
3.1% |
3.1Value: 3.1
|
gerd per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Botswana 100
35.3% |
35.3Value: 35.3
|
researchers per thousand labor force  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Denmark 100
0.9% |
0.9Value: 0.9
|
tertiary graduates from stem programs (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Eswatini 0 Best: Gambia 100
39.6% |
39.6Value: 39.6
|
gerd performed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
1.5% |
1.5Value: 1.5
|
gerd financed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Brunei Darussalam 0 Best: Thailand 100
43.5% |
43.5Value: 43.5
|
researchers in business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mozambique 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
firms that spend on r&d (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Lesotho 0 Best: Finland 100
14.4% |
14.4Value: 14.4
|
high-skilled employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mali 0 Best: United States 100
18.9% |
18.9Value: 18.9
|
intellectual property payments (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Armenia 0 Best: Ireland 100
28.4% |
28.4Value: 28.4
|
state of cluster development  |
Initial Value: 1
|
74.9 |
23.5 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 23.5 Best: Italy 74.9
16.73% |
32.1Value: 32.1
|
outputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 77 / Score 34.1 |
average documents per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0 Best: Panama 100
46.6% |
46.6Value: 46.6
|
citations per document  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Indonesia 0 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100
48.5% |
48.5Value: 48.5
|
patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Tanzania 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
23.9% |
23.9Value: 23.9
|
intellectual property receipts (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: Netherlands 100
3.5% |
3.5Value: 3.5
|
industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0 Best: China 100
0.9% |
0.9Value: 0.9
|
pct applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Pakistan 0 Best: Barbados 100
32.1% |
32.1Value: 32.1
|
firms producing new goods and services (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Egypt 0 Best: Finland 100
47.9% |
47.9Value: 47.9
|
trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: China 100
42.5% |
42.5Value: 42.5
|
cultural goods exports (% exports)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Algeria 0 Best: St. Lucia 100
29.4% |
29.4Value: 29.4
|
printing and publishing output (% manufactured output)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0 Best: Kenya 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
impact
Rank 123 / Score 19.51 |
research institutions prominence  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Albania 0 Best: China 100
0% |
0Value: 0
|
growth of innovative companies  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Sierra Leone 0 Best: Belarus 100
14.1% |
14.1Value: 14.1
|
iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.8 |
0.4 |
Worst: Jamaica 0.4 Best: Israel 80.8
48.13% |
39.1Value: 39.1
|
iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Bulgaria 100
3.7% |
3.7Value: 3.7
|
gerd financed from abroad (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Algeria 0 Best: Israel 100
10.7% |
10.7Value: 10.7
|
joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0 Best: Israel 100
1.7% |
1.7Value: 1.7
|
computer software spending (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0 Best: United States 100
4% |
4Value: 4
|
new business density per thousand population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Liberia 0 Best: Botswana 100
2.7% |
2.7Value: 2.7
|
firms with new product/service (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: St. Lucia 0 Best: Lesotho 100
75% |
75Value: 75
|
infrastructure
Rank 96 / Score 40.37 |
3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Armenia 100
73.9% |
73.9Value: 73.9
|
secure internet servers per 1 million population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Denmark 100
2% |
2Value: 2
|
investment in telecommunication services (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mauritania 0 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100
63.4% |
63.4Value: 63.4
|
mobile upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
7.3% |
7.3Value: 7.3
|
fixed-broadband upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Algeria 0 Best: Singapore 100
3.1% |
3.1Value: 3.1
|
fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Switzerland 100
6.9% |
6.9Value: 6.9
|
fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Kuwait 100
60.9% |
60.9Value: 60.9
|
mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
45.8% |
45.8Value: 45.8
|
internet and telephony competition  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Albania 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
access
Rank 92 / Score 33.4 |
active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
26.1% |
26.1Value: 26.1
|
international internet bandwidth per user  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
43.2% |
43.2Value: 43.2
|
households with internet access at home (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
23.3% |
23.3Value: 23.3
|
individuals with standard ict skills (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Togo 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
tertiary graduates from ict programs (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Eswatini 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
66.4% |
66.4Value: 66.4
|
ict employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Israel 100
8% |
8Value: 8
|
usage
Rank 97 / Score 38.29 |
government online services  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: State of Palestine 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
57.7% |
57.7Value: 57.7
|
fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Kuwait 100
20.2% |
20.2Value: 20.2
|
mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Kuwait 100
6.2% |
6.2Value: 6.2
|
internet users (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
47.8% |
47.8Value: 47.8
|
ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Indonesia 0 Best: Barbados 100
35.2% |
35.2Value: 35.2
|
e-participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: State of Palestine 0 Best: Estonia 100
67.9% |
67.9Value: 67.9
|
internet activities by individuals (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Denmark 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0 Best: Ireland 100
27.7% |
27.7Value: 27.7
|
economic competitiveness
Rank 120 / Score 42.08 |
gross fixed capital formation (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Iraq 0 Best: Tanzania 100
36% |
36Value: 36
|
logistics performance  |
Initial Value: 1
|
80 |
23.7 |
Worst: Afghanistan 23.7 Best: Germany 80
27.89% |
39.4Value: 39.4
|
transport productive capacity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mauritania 0 Best: Belize 100
30.7% |
30.7Value: 30.7
|
building quality control  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
13.3 |
Worst: Liberia 13.3 Best: China 100
61.59% |
66.7Value: 66.7
|
ease of starting a business  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
52.4 |
Worst: Cambodia 52.4 Best: New Zealand 100
55.04% |
78.6Value: 78.6
|
insolvency recovery rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Japan 100
35.2% |
35.2Value: 35.2
|
entrepreneurial employee activity rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: China 0 Best: Denmark 100
7.1% |
7.1Value: 7.1
|
extent of corporate transparency  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Australia 100
42.9% |
42.9Value: 42.9
|
economic openness
Rank 82 / Score 53.52 |
trade (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Sudan 0 Best: Ireland 100
27.6% |
27.6Value: 27.6
|
high-technology trade (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
47.1% |
47.1Value: 47.1
|
product concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.2 |
10.9 |
Worst: Chad 10.9 Best: Croatia 94.2
84.75% |
81.5Value: 81.5
|
market concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.9 |
45.7 |
Worst: Bhutan 45.7 Best: Ukraine 96.9
57.03% |
74.9Value: 74.9
|
chinn-ito financial openness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: Australia 100
70% |
70Value: 70
|
foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: Cyprus 100
38.3% |
38.3Value: 38.3
|
debt dynamics  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mozambique 0 Best: Australia 100
39.5% |
39.5Value: 39.5
|
financing and domestic value added
Rank 64 / Score 52.32 |
domestic credit to private sector (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
23.1% |
23.1Value: 23.1
|
msme financing gap (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Philippines 0 Best: North Macedonia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
tax and contribution rate (% profit)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Argentina 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
71.1% |
71.1Value: 71.1
|
bank non-performing loans (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
94.3% |
94.3Value: 94.3
|
medium- and high-tech activities value added  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Cambodia 0 Best: Singapore 100
22.2% |
22.2Value: 22.2
|
industry and services value added (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Sierra Leone 0 Best: Kuwait 100
63.9% |
63.9Value: 63.9
|
labor underutilization rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Benin 0 Best: Thailand 100
73% |
73Value: 73
|
output per worker  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
8.1% |
8.1Value: 8.1
|
governance
Rank 93 / Score 38.38 |
peace and stability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.6 |
0.5 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.5 Best: New Zealand 97.6
46.65% |
45.8Value: 45.8
|
voice and accountability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
3.4 |
Worst: Lao PDR 3.4 Best: Norway 100
45.96% |
47.8Value: 47.8
|
rule of law  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Venezuela 0 Best: Finland 100
22.1% |
22.1Value: 22.1
|
control of corruption  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
1.9 |
Worst: Yemen 1.9 Best: Denmark 100
27.93% |
29.3Value: 29.3
|
government effectiveness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0.5 |
Worst: Yemen 0.5 Best: Singapore 100
38.19% |
38.5Value: 38.5
|
socio-economic
Rank 101 / Score 48.86 |
female-to-male ratio in parliament  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Yemen 0 Best: Mexico 100
37.7% |
37.7Value: 37.7
|
female-to-male labor force participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Yemen 0 Best: Burundi 100
56.2% |
56.2Value: 56.2
|
female-to-male ratio in internet usage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
52.1 |
Worst: Burundi 52.1 Best: Armenia 100
86.01% |
93.3Value: 93.3
|
social protection coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Uganda 0 Best: Australia 100
19.8% |
19.8Value: 19.8
|
adult literacy rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Ukraine 100
86% |
86Value: 86
|
youth not in employment, education or training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Iraq 0 Best: Japan 100
41.4% |
41.4Value: 41.4
|
poverty headcount ratio (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: China 100
63.5% |
63.5Value: 63.5
|
gdp per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
6.7% |
6.7Value: 6.7
|
health and environment
Rank 76 / Score 63.68 |
universal health coverage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
87 |
28 |
Worst: Chad 28 Best: Australia 87
81.36% |
76Value: 76
|
healthy life expectancy (years)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Lesotho 0 Best: Japan 100
69.1% |
69.1Value: 69.1
|
under-five mortality rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Nigeria 0 Best: Iceland 100
90.2% |
90.2Value: 90.2
|
renewable energy consumption (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bahrain 0 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100
24.1% |
24.1Value: 24.1
|
ecological footprint per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Luxembourg 0 Best: Yemen 100
88.7% |
88.7Value: 88.7
|
natural hazard exposure  |
Initial Value: 1
|
95 |
16 |
Worst: Philippines 16 Best: Finland 95
22.78% |
34Value: 34
|