KPI |
2023 - Finland |
Weight |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value |
Current Value |
knowledge capital
Rank 1 / Score 89.38 |
net enrollment rate in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Myanmar 100.00
96.9% |
96.9Value: 96.9
|
net enrollment rate in lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: France 100.00
98.3% |
98.3Value: 98.3
|
net enrollment rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Portugal 100.00
95.7% |
95.7Value: 95.7
|
years of compulsory education in primary and secondary |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Germany 100.00
92.3% |
92.3Value: 92.3
|
completion rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
91.3% |
91.3Value: 91.3
|
gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Mauritius 100.00
72.7% |
72.7Value: 72.7
|
assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
82% |
82Value: 82
|
learning-adjusted years of schooling |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
89.5% |
89.5Value: 89.5
|
educational enabling environment
Rank 18 / Score 79.29 |
government expenditure on primary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
34% |
34Value: 34
|
government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
50.1% |
50.1Value: 50.1
|
government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
55.8% |
55.8Value: 55.8
|
government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
43.4% |
43.4Value: 43.4
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
schools with access to computers in primary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
schools with access to computers in secondary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
gross enrollment ratio in early childhood education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
72.2% |
72.2Value: 72.2
|
proportion of children who are developmentally on track |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
46.60 |
Worst: Chad 46.60 Best: Uganda 100.00
96.82% |
98.3Value: 98.3
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.90 |
0.90 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.90 Best: Russian Federation 99.90
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritius 0.00 Best: Austria 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
tvet components
Rank 7 / Score 64.21 |
firms offering formal training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Saudi Arabia 0.00 Best: Ecuador 100.00
66.3% |
66.3Value: 66.3
|
Labor force with short-cycle tertiary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Poland 0.00 Best: Latvia 100.00
47.8% |
47.8Value: 47.8
|
participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Sweden 100.00
90.2% |
90.2Value: 90.2
|
government expenditure on vocational education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
67.2% |
67.2Value: 67.2
|
Share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programs |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Saudi Arabia 0.00 Best: Bolivia 100.00
66.5% |
66.5Value: 66.5
|
share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Malta 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
extent of staff training |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.40 |
22.60 |
Worst: Mauritania 22.60 Best: Switzerland 80.40
94.29% |
77.1Value: 77.1
|
quality of vocational training |
Initial Value: 1
|
89.50 |
21.10 |
Worst: Mauritania 21.10 Best: Switzerland 89.50
77.49% |
74.1Value: 74.1
|
ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0.00 Best: Burundi 100.00
9.2% |
9.2Value: 9.2
|
ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0.00 Best: Burundi 100.00
26.1% |
26.1Value: 26.1
|
tvet labor market
Rank 23 / Score 72.12 |
firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Spain 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
74.8% |
74.8Value: 74.8
|
employment educational mismatch (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
76.4% |
76.4Value: 76.4
|
proportion of skilled production workers |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
70% |
70Value: 70
|
unemployment rate with vocational education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
82.9% |
82.9Value: 82.9
|
share of tvet occupations |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
68.3% |
68.3Value: 68.3
|
manufacturing employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Czech Republic 100.00
46.4% |
46.4Value: 46.4
|
enrollment in vocational education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
15.00 |
Worst: Oman 15.00 Best: Uganda 100.00
73.53% |
77.5Value: 77.5
|
vulnerable employment rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
88.5% |
88.5Value: 88.5
|
inputs (higher education)
Rank 14 / Score 53.93 |
government expenditure per tertiary student |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kyrgyz Republic 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
33.2% |
33.2Value: 33.2
|
teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kenya 0.00 Best: Colombia 100.00
34.3% |
34.3Value: 34.3
|
enrollment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Greece 100.00
53.7% |
53.7Value: 53.7
|
enrollment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Suriname 0.00 Best: Norway 100.00
95.8% |
95.8Value: 95.8
|
pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Benin 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
73.2% |
73.2Value: 73.2
|
researchers in higher education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Senegal 100.00
33.4% |
33.4Value: 33.4
|
learning environment
Rank 18 / Score 71.03 |
teachers in tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.30 |
0.00 |
Worst: Myanmar 0.00 Best: United States 98.30
91.35% |
89.8Value: 89.8
|
inbound mobility rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100.00
28.3% |
28.3Value: 28.3
|
academic freedom |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.70 |
1.50 |
Worst: Myanmar 1.50 Best: Czech Republic 97.70
97.19% |
95Value: 95
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
24.50 |
Worst: Tanzania 24.50 Best: Bolivia 100.00
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
48.70 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Dominican Republic 48.70
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.60 |
0.70 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0.70 Best: State of Palestine 98.60
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
outputs (higher education)
Rank 25 / Score 58.85 |
Educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
54.1% |
54.1Value: 54.1
|
educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Guatemala 0.00 Best: Georgia 100.00
48.5% |
48.5Value: 48.5
|
educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: Slovenia 100.00
41.4% |
41.4Value: 41.4
|
Labor force participation rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Ethiopia 100.00
70.5% |
70.5Value: 70.5
|
unemployment rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: State of Palestine 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
87.5% |
87.5Value: 87.5
|
university-industry collaboration in r&d |
Initial Value: 1
|
79.20 |
20.80 |
Worst: Myanmar 20.80 Best: Switzerland 79.20
83.39% |
69.5Value: 69.5
|
citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
29.6% |
29.6Value: 29.6
|
inputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 6 / Score 59.51 |
gerd (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
54.3% |
54.3Value: 54.3
|
gerd per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
21.3% |
21.3Value: 21.3
|
researchers per thousand labor force |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
95.6% |
95.6Value: 95.6
|
tertiary graduates from stem programs (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Malaysia 100.00
70.1% |
70.1Value: 70.1
|
gerd performed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
41.5% |
41.5Value: 41.5
|
gerd financed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Brunei Darussalam 0.00 Best: Thailand 100.00
71.8% |
71.8Value: 71.8
|
researchers in business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
68.5% |
68.5Value: 68.5
|
firms that spend on r&d (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
high-skilled employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
58.6% |
58.6Value: 58.6
|
intellectual property payments (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Armenia 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
20.6% |
20.6Value: 20.6
|
state of cluster development |
Initial Value: 1
|
71.80 |
28.70 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 28.70 Best: Saudi Arabia 71.80
76.33% |
61.6Value: 61.6
|
outputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 10 / Score 46.65 |
average documents per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Colombia 100.00
18.1% |
18.1Value: 18.1
|
citations per document |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Indonesia 0.00 Best: Cape Verde 100.00
44.1% |
44.1Value: 44.1
|
patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
79.7% |
79.7Value: 79.7
|
intellectual property receipts (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Armenia 0.00 Best: Malta 100.00
93.9% |
93.9Value: 93.9
|
industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Honduras 0.00 Best: Italy 100.00
22.6% |
22.6Value: 22.6
|
pct applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
firms producing new goods and services (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
99.4% |
99.4Value: 99.4
|
trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Iran, Islamic Rep. 100.00
22% |
22Value: 22
|
cultural goods exports (% exports) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Dominican Republic 100.00
2.7% |
2.7Value: 2.7
|
printing and publishing output (% manufactured output) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Malta 100.00
14.4% |
14.4Value: 14.4
|
impact
Rank 12 / Score 45.86 |
research institutions prominence |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
67.1% |
67.1Value: 67.1
|
growth of innovative companies |
Initial Value: 1
|
72.50 |
28.70 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 28.70 Best: Israel 72.50
69.86% |
59.3Value: 59.3
|
iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tajikistan 0.00 Best: Belarus 100.00
26.8% |
26.8Value: 26.8
|
iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Bulgaria 100.00
43.8% |
43.8Value: 43.8
|
gerd financed from abroad (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
20.5% |
20.5Value: 20.5
|
joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Iran, Islamic Rep. 0.00 Best: Canada 100.00
53% |
53Value: 53
|
computer software spending (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
57.8% |
57.8Value: 57.8
|
new business density per thousand population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Estonia 100.00
24.2% |
24.2Value: 24.2
|
firms with new product/service (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Pakistan 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
64.9% |
64.9Value: 64.9
|
infrastructure
Rank 37 / Score 70.41 |
3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
secure internet servers per 1 million population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
90.3% |
90.3Value: 90.3
|
investment in telecommunication services (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
38.1% |
38.1Value: 38.1
|
mobile upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
19.9% |
19.9Value: 19.9
|
fixed-broadband upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
24.5% |
24.5Value: 24.5
|
fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Switzerland 100.00
67.9% |
67.9Value: 67.9
|
fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
94.9% |
94.9Value: 94.9
|
mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
98.1% |
98.1Value: 98.1
|
internet and telephony competition |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
access
Rank 7 / Score 65.43 |
active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
67.5% |
67.5Value: 67.5
|
international internet bandwidth per user |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
50.6% |
50.6Value: 50.6
|
households with internet access at home (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Bahrain 100.00
91.4% |
91.4Value: 91.4
|
individuals with standard ict skills (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Togo 0.00 Best: Saudi Arabia 100.00
70.7% |
70.7Value: 70.7
|
tertiary graduates from ict programs (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
45.2% |
45.2Value: 45.2
|
ict employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Trinidad and Tobago 100.00
67.2% |
67.2Value: 67.2
|
usage
Rank 3 / Score 79.47 |
government online services |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
9.50 |
Worst: Mauritania 9.50 Best: Estonia 100.00
98.12% |
98.3Value: 98.3
|
fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
11% |
11Value: 11
|
mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
82.8% |
82.8Value: 82.8
|
internet users (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Bahrain 100.00
92.6% |
92.6Value: 92.6
|
ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
e-participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.90 |
2.30 |
Worst: Mauritania 2.30 Best: Australia 98.90
96.48% |
95.5Value: 95.5
|
internet activities by individuals (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: El Salvador 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
85.7% |
85.7Value: 85.7
|
trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Paraguay 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
69.9% |
69.9Value: 69.9
|
economic competitiveness
Rank 8 / Score 73.3 |
gross fixed capital formation (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ukraine 0.00 Best: Mauritania 100.00
28.1% |
28.1Value: 28.1
|
logistics performance |
Initial Value: 1
|
82.50 |
26.60 |
Worst: Burundi 26.60 Best: Singapore 82.50
95.53% |
80Value: 80
|
transport productive capacity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Seychelles 100.00
71.9% |
71.9Value: 71.9
|
building quality control |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
23.30 |
Worst: Gambia 23.30 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
56.58% |
66.7Value: 66.7
|
ease of starting a business |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
52.40 |
Worst: Cambodia 52.40 Best: New Zealand 100.00
86.34% |
93.5Value: 93.5
|
insolvency recovery rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Norway 100.00
95.8% |
95.8Value: 95.8
|
entrepreneurial employee activity rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Russian Federation 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
64.7% |
64.7Value: 64.7
|
extent of corporate transparency |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Albania 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
85.7% |
85.7Value: 85.7
|
economic openness
Rank 21 / Score 67.29 |
trade (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: United States 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
18.7% |
18.7Value: 18.7
|
high-technology trade (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Albania 0.00 Best: Malaysia 100.00
22.7% |
22.7Value: 22.7
|
product concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.30 |
14.10 |
Worst: Mali 14.10 Best: Poland 94.30
90.27% |
86.5Value: 86.5
|
market concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.80 |
29.30 |
Worst: Mongolia 29.30 Best: Turkey 96.80
98.07% |
95.5Value: 95.5
|
chinn-ito financial openness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cyprus 0.00 Best: Hungary 100.00
37.4% |
37.4Value: 37.4
|
debt dynamics |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
98.8% |
98.8Value: 98.8
|
financing and domestic value added
Rank 25 / Score 59.46 |
domestic credit to private sector (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
36% |
36Value: 36
|
msme financing gap (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Philippines 0.00 Best: North Macedonia 100.00
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
tax and contribution rate (% profit) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Argentina 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
70.9% |
70.9Value: 70.9
|
bank non-performing loans (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
92.3% |
92.3Value: 92.3
|
medium- and high-tech activities value added |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cambodia 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
56.2% |
56.2Value: 56.2
|
industry and services value added (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
49.2% |
49.2Value: 49.2
|
labor underutilization rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Rwanda 0.00 Best: Cambodia 100.00
61.4% |
61.4Value: 61.4
|
output per worker |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
43.3% |
43.3Value: 43.3
|
governance
Rank 5 / Score 93.94 |
peace and stability |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.20 |
1.40 |
Worst: Mali 1.40 Best: Singapore 97.20
81.73% |
79.7Value: 79.7
|
voice and accountability |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
1.90 |
Worst: Myanmar 1.90 Best: Norway 100.00
98.57% |
98.6Value: 98.6
|
rule of law |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
3.30 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 3.30 Best: Denmark 100.00
99.48% |
99.5Value: 99.5
|
control of corruption |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
3.30 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 3.30 Best: Singapore 100.00
96.59% |
96.7Value: 96.7
|
government effectiveness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
4.20 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 4.20 Best: Finland 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
socio-economic
Rank 7 / Score 83.08 |
female-to-male ratio in parliament |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
2.40 |
Worst: Oman 2.40 Best: Mexico 100.00
84.84% |
85.2Value: 85.2
|
female-to-male labor force participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
22.30 |
Worst: Egypt 22.30 Best: Burundi 100.00
87.77% |
90.5Value: 90.5
|
female-to-male ratio in internet usage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
33.10 |
Worst: Niger 33.10 Best: Armenia 100.00
99.25% |
99.5Value: 99.5
|
social protection coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uganda 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
adult literacy rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Ukraine 100.00
0% |
N/AValue: N/A
|
youth not in employment, education or training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
89.9% |
89.9Value: 89.9
|
poverty headcount ratio (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Ukraine 100.00
82.5% |
82.5Value: 82.5
|
gdp per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
42.6% |
42.6Value: 42.6
|
health and environment
Rank 5 / Score 80.3 |
universal health coverage |
Initial Value: 1
|
91.00 |
29.40 |
Worst: Chad 29.40 Best: Canada 91.00
91.4% |
85.7Value: 85.7
|
healthy life expectancy (years) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
91.3% |
91.3Value: 91.3
|
under-five mortality rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Estonia 100.00
99.8% |
99.8Value: 99.8
|
renewable energy consumption (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bahrain 0.00 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100.00
49.4% |
49.4Value: 49.4
|
ecological footprint per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Luxembourg 0.00 Best: Rwanda 100.00
60.6% |
60.6Value: 60.6
|
natural hazard exposure |
Initial Value: 1
|
95.00 |
16.00 |
Worst: Philippines 16.00 Best: Finland 95.00
100% |
95Value: 95
|