KPI  |
2023 - Argentina |
Weight  |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value  |
Current Value |
knowledge capital
Rank 59 / Score 72.97 |
net enrollment rate in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Myanmar 100.00
98.2% |
98.2Value: 98.2
|
net enrollment rate in lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: France 100.00
98.7% |
98.7Value: 98.7
|
net enrollment rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Portugal 100.00
95.6% |
95.6Value: 95.6
|
years of compulsory education in primary and secondary  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Germany 100.00
92.3% |
92.3Value: 92.3
|
completion rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
64.6% |
64.6Value: 64.6
|
gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Mauritius 100.00
80.7% |
80.7Value: 80.7
|
assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
27.4% |
27.4Value: 27.4
|
learning-adjusted years of schooling  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
57% |
57Value: 57
|
educational enabling environment
Rank 90 / Score 58.2 |
government expenditure on primary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
36.5% |
36.5Value: 36.5
|
government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
36.8% |
36.8Value: 36.8
|
government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
34% |
34Value: 34
|
government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
23.5% |
23.5Value: 23.5
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
schools with access to computers in primary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
62.7% |
62.7Value: 62.7
|
schools with access to computers in secondary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
57.9% |
57.9Value: 57.9
|
gross enrollment ratio in early childhood education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
36.5% |
36.5Value: 36.5
|
proportion of children who are developmentally on track  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
80.9% |
80.9Value: 80.9
|
proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
46.60 |
Worst: Chad 46.60 Best: Uganda 100.00
64.61% |
81.1Value: 81.1
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.90 |
0.90 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.90 Best: Russian Federation 99.90
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritius 0.00 Best: Austria 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
tvet components
Rank 51 / Score 45.16 |
firms offering formal training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Saudi Arabia 0.00 Best: Ecuador 100.00
52% |
52Value: 52
|
Labor force with short-cycle tertiary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Poland 0.00 Best: Latvia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Sweden 100.00
40.3% |
40.3Value: 40.3
|
government expenditure on vocational education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
Share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programs  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Saudi Arabia 0.00 Best: Bolivia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Malta 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
extent of staff training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.40 |
22.60 |
Worst: Mauritania 22.60 Best: Switzerland 80.40
63.84% |
59.5Value: 59.5
|
quality of vocational training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
89.50 |
21.10 |
Worst: Mauritania 21.10 Best: Switzerland 89.50
35.09% |
45.1Value: 45.1
|
ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0.00 Best: Burundi 100.00
32.3% |
32.3Value: 32.3
|
ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0.00 Best: Burundi 100.00
39.8% |
39.8Value: 39.8
|
tvet labor market
Rank 75 / Score 60.64 |
firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Spain 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
20.5% |
20.5Value: 20.5
|
employment educational mismatch (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
71.8% |
71.8Value: 71.8
|
proportion of skilled production workers  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
38.7% |
38.7Value: 38.7
|
unemployment rate with vocational education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
78.7% |
78.7Value: 78.7
|
share of tvet occupations  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
72.5% |
72.5Value: 72.5
|
manufacturing employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Czech Republic 100.00
40.5% |
40.5Value: 40.5
|
enrollment in vocational education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
15.00 |
Worst: Oman 15.00 Best: Uganda 100.00
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
vulnerable employment rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
73% |
73Value: 73
|
inputs (higher education)
Rank 56 / Score 42.22 |
government expenditure per tertiary student  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kyrgyz Republic 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
5.2% |
5.2Value: 5.2
|
teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kenya 0.00 Best: Colombia 100.00
65.5% |
65.5Value: 65.5
|
enrollment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Greece 100.00
66.2% |
66.2Value: 66.2
|
enrollment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Suriname 0.00 Best: Norway 100.00
39% |
39Value: 39
|
pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Benin 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
researchers in higher education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Senegal 100.00
38.7% |
38.7Value: 38.7
|
learning environment
Rank 58 / Score 53 |
teachers in tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.30 |
0.00 |
Worst: Myanmar 0.00 Best: United States 98.30
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
inbound mobility rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100.00
11.1% |
11.1Value: 11.1
|
academic freedom  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.70 |
1.50 |
Worst: Myanmar 1.50 Best: Czech Republic 97.70
97.09% |
94.9Value: 94.9
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
24.50 |
Worst: Tanzania 24.50 Best: Bolivia 100.00
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
48.70 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Dominican Republic 48.70
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.60 |
0.70 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0.70 Best: State of Palestine 98.60
|
n/aValue: n/a
|
outputs (higher education)
Rank 43 / Score 54.75 |
Educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Guatemala 0.00 Best: Georgia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: Slovenia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
Labor force participation rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Ethiopia 100.00
77.4% |
77.4Value: 77.4
|
unemployment rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: State of Palestine 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
89.2% |
89.2Value: 89.2
|
university-industry collaboration in r&d  |
Initial Value: 1
|
79.20 |
20.80 |
Worst: Myanmar 20.80 Best: Switzerland 79.20
36.99% |
42.4Value: 42.4
|
citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
10% |
10Value: 10
|
inputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 80 / Score 24.39 |
gerd (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
9.6% |
9.6Value: 9.6
|
gerd per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
9.3% |
9.3Value: 9.3
|
researchers per thousand labor force  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
18.3% |
18.3Value: 18.3
|
tertiary graduates from stem programs (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Malaysia 100.00
37.4% |
37.4Value: 37.4
|
gerd performed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
3.4% |
3.4Value: 3.4
|
gerd financed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Brunei Darussalam 0.00 Best: Thailand 100.00
25.6% |
25.6Value: 25.6
|
researchers in business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
12.7% |
12.7Value: 12.7
|
firms that spend on r&d (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
47.5% |
47.5Value: 47.5
|
high-skilled employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
29.2% |
29.2Value: 29.2
|
intellectual property payments (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Armenia 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
42.8% |
42.8Value: 42.8
|
state of cluster development  |
Initial Value: 1
|
71.80 |
28.70 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 28.70 Best: Saudi Arabia 71.80
30.63% |
41.9Value: 41.9
|
outputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 76 / Score 24.41 |
average documents per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Colombia 100.00
9.1% |
9.1Value: 9.1
|
citations per document  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Indonesia 0.00 Best: Cape Verde 100.00
18.8% |
18.8Value: 18.8
|
patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
41.9% |
41.9Value: 41.9
|
intellectual property receipts (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Armenia 0.00 Best: Malta 100.00
8.4% |
8.4Value: 8.4
|
industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Honduras 0.00 Best: Italy 100.00
10.5% |
10.5Value: 10.5
|
pct applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
0.6% |
0.6Value: 0.6
|
firms producing new goods and services (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
63.8% |
63.8Value: 63.8
|
trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Iran, Islamic Rep. 100.00
44.3% |
44.3Value: 44.3
|
cultural goods exports (% exports)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Dominican Republic 100.00
6.4% |
6.4Value: 6.4
|
printing and publishing output (% manufactured output)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Malta 100.00
40.1% |
40.1Value: 40.1
|
impact
Rank 78 / Score 28.3 |
research institutions prominence  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
65.2% |
65.2Value: 65.2
|
growth of innovative companies  |
Initial Value: 1
|
72.50 |
28.70 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 28.70 Best: Israel 72.50
37.9% |
45.3Value: 45.3
|
iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tajikistan 0.00 Best: Belarus 100.00
16% |
16Value: 16
|
iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Bulgaria 100.00
10.2% |
10.2Value: 10.2
|
gerd financed from abroad (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
19.6% |
19.6Value: 19.6
|
joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Iran, Islamic Rep. 0.00 Best: Canada 100.00
3.1% |
3.1Value: 3.1
|
computer software spending (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
26.4% |
26.4Value: 26.4
|
new business density per thousand population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Estonia 100.00
0.7% |
0.7Value: 0.7
|
firms with new product/service (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Pakistan 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
68% |
68Value: 68
|
infrastructure
Rank 63 / Score 59.82 |
3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
97.6% |
97.6Value: 97.6
|
secure internet servers per 1 million population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
65.5% |
65.5Value: 65.5
|
investment in telecommunication services (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
37.6% |
37.6Value: 37.6
|
mobile upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
11.3% |
11.3Value: 11.3
|
fixed-broadband upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
12% |
12Value: 12
|
fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Switzerland 100.00
44% |
44Value: 44
|
fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
73.5% |
73.5Value: 73.5
|
mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
96.9% |
96.9Value: 96.9
|
internet and telephony competition  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
100% |
100Value: 100
|
access
Rank 88 / Score 34.46 |
active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
29.4% |
29.4Value: 29.4
|
international internet bandwidth per user  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
44.4% |
44.4Value: 44.4
|
households with internet access at home (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Bahrain 100.00
92% |
92Value: 92
|
individuals with standard ict skills (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Togo 0.00 Best: Saudi Arabia 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
tertiary graduates from ict programs (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
12.4% |
12.4Value: 12.4
|
ict employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Trinidad and Tobago 100.00
14.9% |
14.9Value: 14.9
|
usage
Rank 48 / Score 48.6 |
government online services  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
9.50 |
Worst: Mauritania 9.50 Best: Estonia 100.00
78.9% |
80.9Value: 80.9
|
fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
7.1% |
7.1Value: 7.1
|
internet users (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Bahrain 100.00
87.7% |
87.7Value: 87.7
|
ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bangladesh 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
0.2% |
0.2Value: 0.2
|
e-participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
98.90 |
2.30 |
Worst: Mauritania 2.30 Best: Australia 98.90
64.7% |
64.8Value: 64.8
|
internet activities by individuals (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: El Salvador 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Paraguay 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
50.9% |
50.9Value: 50.9
|
economic competitiveness
Rank 91 / Score 45.06 |
gross fixed capital formation (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ukraine 0.00 Best: Mauritania 100.00
12.2% |
12.2Value: 12.2
|
logistics performance  |
Initial Value: 1
|
82.50 |
26.60 |
Worst: Burundi 26.60 Best: Singapore 82.50
32.92% |
45Value: 45
|
transport productive capacity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Seychelles 100.00
44.9% |
44.9Value: 44.9
|
building quality control  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
23.30 |
Worst: Gambia 23.30 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
65.19% |
73.3Value: 73.3
|
ease of starting a business  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
52.40 |
Worst: Cambodia 52.40 Best: New Zealand 100.00
58.82% |
80.4Value: 80.4
|
insolvency recovery rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Norway 100.00
20.9% |
20.9Value: 20.9
|
entrepreneurial employee activity rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Russian Federation 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
12.4% |
12.4Value: 12.4
|
extent of corporate transparency  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Albania 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
71.4% |
71.4Value: 71.4
|
economic openness
Rank 103 / Score 39.36 |
trade (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: United States 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
1.8% |
1.8Value: 1.8
|
high-technology trade (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Albania 0.00 Best: Malaysia 100.00
25.1% |
25.1Value: 25.1
|
product concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.30 |
14.10 |
Worst: Mali 14.10 Best: Poland 94.30
78.18% |
76.8Value: 76.8
|
market concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.80 |
29.30 |
Worst: Mongolia 29.30 Best: Turkey 96.80
97.78% |
95.3Value: 95.3
|
chinn-ito financial openness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
28.3% |
28.3Value: 28.3
|
foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cyprus 0.00 Best: Hungary 100.00
33.9% |
33.9Value: 33.9
|
debt dynamics  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
24.7% |
24.7Value: 24.7
|
financing and domestic value added
Rank 114 / Score 38.38 |
domestic credit to private sector (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
3.4% |
3.4Value: 3.4
|
msme financing gap (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Philippines 0.00 Best: North Macedonia 100.00
80.9% |
80.9Value: 80.9
|
tax and contribution rate (% profit)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Argentina 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
bank non-performing loans (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
80.4% |
80.4Value: 80.4
|
medium- and high-tech activities value added  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cambodia 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
34.7% |
34.7Value: 34.7
|
industry and services value added (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
35.4% |
35.4Value: 35.4
|
labor underutilization rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Rwanda 0.00 Best: Cambodia 100.00
51.2% |
51.2Value: 51.2
|
output per worker  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
21% |
21Value: 21
|
governance
Rank 68 / Score 46.24 |
peace and stability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.20 |
1.40 |
Worst: Mali 1.40 Best: Singapore 97.20
47.29% |
46.7Value: 46.7
|
voice and accountability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
1.90 |
Worst: Myanmar 1.90 Best: Norway 100.00
62.08% |
62.8Value: 62.8
|
rule of law  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
3.30 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 3.30 Best: Denmark 100.00
34.13% |
36.3Value: 36.3
|
control of corruption  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
3.30 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 3.30 Best: Singapore 100.00
40.02% |
42Value: 42
|
government effectiveness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
4.20 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 4.20 Best: Finland 100.00
32.05% |
34.9Value: 34.9
|
socio-economic
Rank 63 / Score 58.53 |
female-to-male ratio in parliament  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
2.40 |
Worst: Oman 2.40 Best: Mexico 100.00
80.53% |
81Value: 81
|
female-to-male labor force participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
22.30 |
Worst: Egypt 22.30 Best: Burundi 100.00
64.09% |
72.1Value: 72.1
|
female-to-male ratio in internet usage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
33.10 |
Worst: Niger 33.10 Best: Armenia 100.00
98.95% |
99.3Value: 99.3
|
social protection coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uganda 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
57.2% |
57.2Value: 57.2
|
adult literacy rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Ukraine 100.00
0% |
n/aValue: n/a
|
youth not in employment, education or training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
66.2% |
66.2Value: 66.2
|
poverty headcount ratio (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Ukraine 100.00
40.6% |
40.6Value: 40.6
|
gdp per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
18.9% |
18.9Value: 18.9
|
health and environment
Rank 57 / Score 66.32 |
universal health coverage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
91.00 |
29.40 |
Worst: Chad 29.40 Best: Canada 91.00
79.71% |
78.5Value: 78.5
|
healthy life expectancy (years)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
78.1% |
78.1Value: 78.1
|
under-five mortality rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Estonia 100.00
95.7% |
95.7Value: 95.7
|
renewable energy consumption (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bahrain 0.00 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100.00
10.2% |
10.2Value: 10.2
|
ecological footprint per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Luxembourg 0.00 Best: Rwanda 100.00
76.4% |
76.4Value: 76.4
|
natural hazard exposure  |
Initial Value: 1
|
95.00 |
16.00 |
Worst: Philippines 16.00 Best: Finland 95.00
54.43% |
59Value: 59
|