KPI |
2021 - Honduras |
Weight |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value |
Current Value |
knowledge capital
Rank 126 / Score 44 |
net enrollment rate in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: France 100.00
51.4% |
51.4Value: 51.4
|
net enrollment rate in lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
40.5% |
40.5Value: 40.5
|
net enrollment rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Azerbaijan 100.00
33.1% |
33.1Value: 33.1
|
years of compulsory education in primary and secondary |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Germany 100.00
84.6% |
84.6Value: 84.6
|
completion rate in upper secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Kazakhstan 100.00
47.7% |
47.7Value: 47.7
|
gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
27.7% |
27.7Value: 27.7
|
assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: China 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
learning-adjusted years of schooling |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Liberia 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
37% |
37Value: 37
|
educational enabling environment
Rank 134 / Score 37.53 |
government expenditure on primary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Timor-Leste 100.00
64.7% |
64.7Value: 64.7
|
government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
26.9% |
26.9Value: 26.9
|
government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0.00 Best: Croatia 100.00
51.5% |
51.5Value: 51.5
|
government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Guatemala 0.00 Best: Tunisia 100.00
32% |
32Value: 32
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Malawi 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
schools with access to computers in primary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
15.7% |
15.7Value: 15.7
|
schools with access to computers in secondary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
gross enrollment ratio in early childhood education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Yemen 0.00 Best: Liberia 100.00
31.1% |
31.1Value: 31.1
|
proportion of children who are developmentally on track |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
44.3% |
44.3Value: 44.3
|
proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Gambia 0.00 Best: Serbia 100.00
28.2% |
28.2Value: 28.2
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
79.2% |
79.2Value: 79.2
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
30.20 |
Worst: Niger 30.20 Best: Czech Republic 100.00
65.19% |
75.7Value: 75.7
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Iceland 100.00
20.1% |
20.1Value: 20.1
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
2.40 |
Worst: Niger 2.40 Best: Austria 100.00
37.5% |
39Value: 39
|
tvet components
Rank 44 / Score 50.05 |
firms offering formal training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Timor-Leste 0.00 Best: China 100.00
59.2% |
59.2Value: 59.2
|
Labor force with short-cycle tertiary education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Latvia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Viet Nam 0.00 Best: Paraguay 100.00
4.3% |
4.3Value: 4.3
|
government expenditure on vocational education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
Share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programs |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Jamaica 0.00 Best: Bolivia 100.00
59.2% |
59.2Value: 59.2
|
share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Israel 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
extent of staff training |
Initial Value: 1
|
79.00 |
24.10 |
Worst: Mauritania 24.10 Best: Switzerland 79.00
51% |
52.1Value: 52.1
|
quality of vocational training |
Initial Value: 1
|
90.80 |
25.60 |
Worst: Angola 25.60 Best: Switzerland 90.80
35.74% |
48.9Value: 48.9
|
ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Botswana 100.00
73.7% |
73.7Value: 73.7
|
ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Malawi 100.00
62.1% |
62.1Value: 62.1
|
tvet labor market
Rank 78 / Score 59.18 |
firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
33.9% |
33.9Value: 33.9
|
employment educational mismatch (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0.00 Best: Romania 100.00
40.9% |
40.9Value: 40.9
|
proportion of skilled production workers |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: South Africa 100.00
74.1% |
74.1Value: 74.1
|
unemployment rate with vocational education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
72.7% |
72.7Value: 72.7
|
share of tvet occupations |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
45.7% |
45.7Value: 45.7
|
manufacturing employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
56.4% |
56.4Value: 56.4
|
enrollment in vocational education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.90 |
5.60 |
Worst: Yemen 5.60 Best: Brunei Darussalam 99.90
83.67% |
84.5Value: 84.5
|
vulnerable employment rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Qatar 100.00
57.7% |
57.7Value: 57.7
|
inputs (higher education)
Rank 77 / Score 38.17 |
government expenditure per tertiary student |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: St. Lucia 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
7.9% |
7.9Value: 7.9
|
teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Kenya 0.00 Best: Indonesia 100.00
39.6% |
39.6Value: 39.6
|
enrollment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Greece 100.00
16.9% |
16.9Value: 16.9
|
enrollment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: France 100.00
8.2% |
8.2Value: 8.2
|
pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Sudan 0.00 Best: Lebanon 100.00
71.6% |
71.6Value: 71.6
|
researchers in higher education (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: Senegal 100.00
84.8% |
84.8Value: 84.8
|
learning environment
Rank 89 / Score 46.85 |
teachers in tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.30 |
0.00 |
Worst: Myanmar 0.00 Best: Panama 99.30
86.2% |
85.6Value: 85.6
|
inbound mobility rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
2.9% |
2.9Value: 2.9
|
academic freedom |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.20 |
4.10 |
Worst: Bahrain 4.10 Best: Uruguay 97.20
95.17% |
92.7Value: 92.7
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.20 |
31.80 |
Worst: Niger 31.80 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 99.20
66.91% |
76.9Value: 76.9
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
1.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 1.00 Best: Barbados 100.00
14.04% |
14.9Value: 14.9
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity |
Initial Value: 1
|
46.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: State of Palestine 46.00
17.61% |
8.1Value: 8.1
|
outputs (higher education)
Rank 100 / Score 43.73 |
Educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Lithuania 100.00
23.5% |
23.5Value: 23.5
|
educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Guatemala 0.00 Best: Georgia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: Slovenia 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
Labor force participation rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Venezuela 0.00 Best: Tanzania 100.00
84.5% |
84.5Value: 84.5
|
unemployment rate with advanced education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Trinidad and Tobago 0.00 Best: Myanmar 100.00
81.5% |
81.5Value: 81.5
|
university-industry collaboration in r&d |
Initial Value: 1
|
78.50 |
16.00 |
Worst: Angola 16.00 Best: Israel 78.50
35.04% |
37.9Value: 37.9
|
citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
11.5% |
11.5Value: 11.5
|
inputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 139 / Score 14.5 |
gerd (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
0.6% |
0.6Value: 0.6
|
gerd per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Botswana 100.00
9.5% |
9.5Value: 9.5
|
researchers per thousand labor force |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
0.3% |
0.3Value: 0.3
|
tertiary graduates from stem programs (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Gambia 100.00
29.1% |
29.1Value: 29.1
|
gerd performed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
gerd financed by business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Brunei Darussalam 0.00 Best: Thailand 100.00
12.9% |
12.9Value: 12.9
|
researchers in business enterprises (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
firms that spend on r&d (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
13.8% |
13.8Value: 13.8
|
high-skilled employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mali 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
9.6% |
9.6Value: 9.6
|
intellectual property payments (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Armenia 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
19.1% |
19.1Value: 19.1
|
state of cluster development |
Initial Value: 1
|
74.90 |
23.50 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 23.50 Best: Italy 74.90
43.77% |
46Value: 46
|
outputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 71 / Score 35.96 |
average documents per researcher |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0.00 Best: Panama 100.00
53.2% |
53.2Value: 53.2
|
citations per document |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Indonesia 0.00 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100.00
69.5% |
69.5Value: 69.5
|
patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Tanzania 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
31% |
31Value: 31
|
intellectual property receipts (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: Netherlands 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0.00 Best: China 100.00
0.3% |
0.3Value: 0.3
|
pct applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Pakistan 0.00 Best: Barbados 100.00
32.6% |
32.6Value: 32.6
|
firms producing new goods and services (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Egypt 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
53.3% |
53.3Value: 53.3
|
trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: China 100.00
23.4% |
23.4Value: 23.4
|
cultural goods exports (% exports) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Algeria 0.00 Best: St. Lucia 100.00
1.9% |
1.9Value: 1.9
|
printing and publishing output (% manufactured output) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Myanmar 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
impact
Rank 54 / Score 34.57 |
research institutions prominence |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Albania 0.00 Best: China 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
growth of innovative companies |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Sierra Leone 0.00 Best: Belarus 100.00
12.6% |
12.6Value: 12.6
|
iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.80 |
0.40 |
Worst: Jamaica 0.40 Best: Israel 80.80
59.83% |
48.5Value: 48.5
|
iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Bulgaria 100.00
6.7% |
6.7Value: 6.7
|
gerd financed from abroad (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Algeria 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
6.7% |
6.7Value: 6.7
|
joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
7.9% |
7.9Value: 7.9
|
computer software spending (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: United States 100.00
23.1% |
23.1Value: 23.1
|
new business density per thousand population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Liberia 0.00 Best: Botswana 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
firms with new product/service (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: St. Lucia 0.00 Best: Lesotho 100.00
74.2% |
74.2Value: 74.2
|
infrastructure
Rank 122 / Score 31.78 |
3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: Armenia 100.00
75% |
75Value: 75
|
secure internet servers per 1 million population |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
1.7% |
1.7Value: 1.7
|
investment in telecommunication services (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100.00
49.3% |
49.3Value: 49.3
|
mobile upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Niger 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
20.2% |
20.2Value: 20.2
|
fixed-broadband upload and download speeds |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Algeria 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
4.1% |
4.1Value: 4.1
|
fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Switzerland 100.00
5.1% |
5.1Value: 5.1
|
fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
54.3% |
54.3Value: 54.3
|
mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
26.3% |
26.3Value: 26.3
|
internet and telephony competition |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: Albania 100.00
50% |
50Value: 50
|
access
Rank 117 / Score 23.48 |
active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
21.6% |
21.6Value: 21.6
|
international internet bandwidth per user |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
37.9% |
37.9Value: 37.9
|
households with internet access at home (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
26.3% |
26.3Value: 26.3
|
individuals with standard ict skills (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Togo 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
tertiary graduates from ict programs (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Eswatini 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
24.8% |
24.8Value: 24.8
|
ict employment (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Israel 100.00
6.8% |
6.8Value: 6.8
|
usage
Rank 113 / Score 32.08 |
government online services |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Hong Kong SAR 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
46.5% |
46.5Value: 46.5
|
fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
13.8% |
13.8Value: 13.8
|
mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bhutan 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
20.5% |
20.5Value: 20.5
|
internet users (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: United Arab Emirates 100.00
28.4% |
28.4Value: 28.4
|
ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Indonesia 0.00 Best: Barbados 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
e-participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Hong Kong SAR 0.00 Best: Estonia 100.00
48.8% |
48.8Value: 48.8
|
internet activities by individuals (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
24.9% |
24.9Value: 24.9
|
economic competitiveness
Rank 134 / Score 37.08 |
gross fixed capital formation (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Iraq 0.00 Best: Tanzania 100.00
40% |
40Value: 40
|
logistics performance |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.00 |
23.70 |
Worst: Afghanistan 23.70 Best: Germany 80.00
29.13% |
40.1Value: 40.1
|
transport productive capacity |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mauritania 0.00 Best: Belize 100.00
32.5% |
32.5Value: 32.5
|
building quality control |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
13.30 |
Worst: Liberia 13.30 Best: China 100.00
53.86% |
60Value: 60
|
ease of starting a business |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
52.40 |
Worst: Cambodia 52.40 Best: New Zealand 100.00
39.92% |
71.4Value: 71.4
|
insolvency recovery rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Japan 100.00
21.6% |
21.6Value: 21.6
|
entrepreneurial employee activity rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: China 0.00 Best: Denmark 100.00
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
extent of corporate transparency |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
0% |
0Value: 0
|
economic openness
Rank 111 / Score 47.54 |
trade (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Sudan 0.00 Best: Ireland 100.00
35.2% |
35.2Value: 35.2
|
high-technology trade (% total trade) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
42.2% |
42.2Value: 42.2
|
product concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.20 |
10.90 |
Worst: Chad 10.90 Best: Croatia 94.20
77.07% |
75.1Value: 75.1
|
market concentration |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.90 |
45.70 |
Worst: Bhutan 45.70 Best: Ukraine 96.90
50.78% |
71.7Value: 71.7
|
chinn-ito financial openness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
16.4% |
16.4Value: 16.4
|
foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: Cyprus 100.00
51% |
51Value: 51
|
debt dynamics |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Mozambique 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
49.7% |
49.7Value: 49.7
|
financing and domestic value added
Rank 96 / Score 46.29 |
domestic credit to private sector (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.00 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100.00
26.1% |
26.1Value: 26.1
|
msme financing gap (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Philippines 0.00 Best: North Macedonia 100.00
72.2% |
72.2Value: 72.2
|
tax and contribution rate (% profit) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Argentina 0.00 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100.00
68.4% |
68.4Value: 68.4
|
bank non-performing loans (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Angola 0.00 Best: Korea, Rep. 100.00
87.7% |
87.7Value: 87.7
|
medium- and high-tech activities value added |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Cambodia 0.00 Best: Singapore 100.00
8.1% |
8.1Value: 8.1
|
industry and services value added (% gdp) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Sierra Leone 0.00 Best: Kuwait 100.00
62.6% |
62.6Value: 62.6
|
labor underutilization rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Benin 0.00 Best: Thailand 100.00
40.6% |
40.6Value: 40.6
|
output per worker |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
4.6% |
4.6Value: 4.6
|
governance
Rank 119 / Score 25.62 |
peace and stability |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.60 |
0.50 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.50 Best: New Zealand 97.60
26.67% |
26.4Value: 26.4
|
voice and accountability |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
3.40 |
Worst: Lao PDR 3.40 Best: Norway 100.00
28.47% |
30.9Value: 30.9
|
rule of law |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Venezuela 0.00 Best: Finland 100.00
17.3% |
17.3Value: 17.3
|
control of corruption |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
1.90 |
Worst: Yemen 1.90 Best: Denmark 100.00
19.16% |
20.7Value: 20.7
|
government effectiveness |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.50 |
Worst: Yemen 0.50 Best: Singapore 100.00
29.45% |
29.8Value: 29.8
|
socio-economic
Rank 134 / Score 37 |
female-to-male ratio in parliament |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Yemen 0.00 Best: Mexico 100.00
26.7% |
26.7Value: 26.7
|
female-to-male labor force participation |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Yemen 0.00 Best: Burundi 100.00
57.1% |
57.1Value: 57.1
|
female-to-male ratio in internet usage |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
52.10 |
Worst: Burundi 52.10 Best: Armenia 100.00
|
NAValue: NA
|
social protection coverage (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Uganda 0.00 Best: Australia 100.00
24.5% |
24.5Value: 24.5
|
adult literacy rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Chad 0.00 Best: Ukraine 100.00
85.2% |
85.2Value: 85.2
|
youth not in employment, education or training (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Iraq 0.00 Best: Japan 100.00
43% |
43Value: 43
|
poverty headcount ratio (% population) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Madagascar 0.00 Best: China 100.00
32.4% |
32.4Value: 32.4
|
gdp per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Burundi 0.00 Best: Luxembourg 100.00
4% |
4Value: 4
|
health and environment
Rank 60 / Score 65.7 |
universal health coverage |
Initial Value: 1
|
87.00 |
28.00 |
Worst: Chad 28.00 Best: Australia 87.00
62.71% |
65Value: 65
|
healthy life expectancy (years) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Lesotho 0.00 Best: Japan 100.00
62.8% |
62.8Value: 62.8
|
under-five mortality rate |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Nigeria 0.00 Best: Iceland 100.00
87.1% |
87.1Value: 87.1
|
renewable energy consumption (%) |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Bahrain 0.00 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100.00
51.9% |
51.9Value: 51.9
|
ecological footprint per capita |
Initial Value: 1
|
100.00 |
0.00 |
Worst: Luxembourg 0.00 Best: Yemen 100.00
92.4% |
92.4Value: 92.4
|
natural hazard exposure |
Initial Value: 1
|
95.00 |
16.00 |
Worst: Philippines 16.00 Best: Finland 95.00
24.05% |
35Value: 35
|