KPI  |
2021 |
Weight  |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value  |
Indonesia |
knowledge capital
Rank 96 / Score 60.86 |
net enrollment rate in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mali 0 Best: France 100
82.9% |
82.9Value: 82.9
|
net enrollment rate in lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Tanzania 0 Best: Israel 100
77.2% |
77.2Value: 77.2
|
net enrollment rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Azerbaijan 100
74% |
74Value: 74
|
years of compulsory education in primary and secondary  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Germany 100
69.2% |
69.2Value: 69.2
|
completion rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Kazakhstan 100
62% |
62Value: 62
|
gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
73.7% |
73.7Value: 73.7
|
assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0 Best: China 100
19.5% |
19.5Value: 19.5
|
learning-adjusted years of schooling  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Liberia 0 Best: Singapore 100
53% |
53Value: 53
|
educational enabling environment
Rank 97 / Score 54.28 |
government expenditure on primary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0 Best: Timor-Leste 100
32.7% |
32.7Value: 32.7
|
government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Tunisia 100
13.8% |
13.8Value: 13.8
|
government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0 Best: Croatia 100
31.7% |
31.7Value: 31.7
|
government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Guatemala 0 Best: Tunisia 100
11.2% |
11.2Value: 11.2
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Kuwait 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
schools with access to computers in primary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Armenia 100
40.1% |
40.1Value: 40.1
|
schools with access to computers in secondary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Albania 100
92.8% |
92.8Value: 92.8
|
gross enrollment ratio in early childhood education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Yemen 0 Best: Liberia 100
37.8% |
37.8Value: 37.8
|
proportion of children who are developmentally on track  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Serbia 100
84.5% |
84.5Value: 84.5
|
proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Gambia 0 Best: Serbia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Armenia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
30.2 |
Worst: Niger 30.2 Best: Czech Republic 100
97.99% |
98.6Value: 98.6
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mozambique 0 Best: Iceland 100
34.8% |
34.8Value: 34.8
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
2.4 |
Worst: Niger 2.4 Best: Austria 100
67.32% |
68.1Value: 68.1
|
tvet components
Rank 112 / Score 37.5 |
firms offering formal training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Timor-Leste 0 Best: China 100
7.5% |
7.5Value: 7.5
|
Labor force with short-cycle tertiary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Latvia 100
82.1% |
82.1Value: 82.1
|
participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Viet Nam 0 Best: Paraguay 100
0.8% |
0.8Value: 0.8
|
government expenditure on vocational education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Netherlands 100
14.3% |
14.3Value: 14.3
|
Share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programs  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Jamaica 0 Best: Bolivia 100
31.3% |
31.3Value: 31.3
|
share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Israel 0 Best: Australia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
extent of staff training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
79 |
24.1 |
Worst: Mauritania 24.1 Best: Switzerland 79
65.94% |
60.3Value: 60.3
|
quality of vocational training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
90.8 |
25.6 |
Worst: Angola 25.6 Best: Switzerland 90.8
52.91% |
60.1Value: 60.1
|
ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Botswana 100
59.6% |
59.6Value: 59.6
|
ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Malawi 100
58.3% |
58.3Value: 58.3
|
tvet labor market
Rank 67 / Score 61.58 |
firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: South Africa 100
81.3% |
81.3Value: 81.3
|
employment educational mismatch (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0 Best: Romania 100
60.1% |
60.1Value: 60.1
|
proportion of skilled production workers  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mauritania 0 Best: South Africa 100
70.2% |
70.2Value: 70.2
|
unemployment rate with vocational education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0 Best: Qatar 100
81.7% |
81.7Value: 81.7
|
share of tvet occupations  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Qatar 100
39.3% |
39.3Value: 39.3
|
manufacturing employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Lesotho 100
47.6% |
47.6Value: 47.6
|
enrollment in vocational education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.9 |
5.6 |
Worst: Yemen 5.6 Best: Brunei Darussalam 99.9
86.32% |
87Value: 87
|
vulnerable employment rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Qatar 100
48.9% |
48.9Value: 48.9
|
inputs (higher education)
Rank 54 / Score 44.23 |
government expenditure per tertiary student  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: St. Lucia 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
7.7% |
7.7Value: 7.7
|
teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Kenya 0 Best: Indonesia 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
enrollment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Greece 100
22% |
22Value: 22
|
enrollment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: France 100
6.3% |
6.3Value: 6.3
|
pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Sudan 0 Best: Lebanon 100
50.3% |
50.3Value: 50.3
|
researchers in higher education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mali 0 Best: Senegal 100
79.1% |
79.1Value: 79.1
|
learning environment
Rank 91 / Score 46.35 |
teachers in tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.3 |
0 |
Worst: Myanmar 0 Best: Panama 99.3
76.74% |
76.2Value: 76.2
|
inbound mobility rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Australia 100
0.3% |
0.3Value: 0.3
|
academic freedom  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.2 |
4.1 |
Worst: Bahrain 4.1 Best: Uruguay 97.2
64.02% |
63.7Value: 63.7
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.2 |
31.8 |
Worst: Niger 31.8 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 99.2
59.2% |
71.7Value: 71.7
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
1 |
Worst: Mozambique 1 Best: Barbados 100
53.94% |
54.4Value: 54.4
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
46 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: State of Palestine 46
25.65% |
11.8Value: 11.8
|
outputs (higher education)
Rank 91 / Score 45.41 |
Educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Lithuania 100
25.8% |
25.8Value: 25.8
|
educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Guatemala 0 Best: Georgia 100
2.2% |
2.2Value: 2.2
|
educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0 Best: Slovenia 100
2.1% |
2.1Value: 2.1
|
Labor force participation rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Venezuela 0 Best: Tanzania 100
82.8% |
82.8Value: 82.8
|
unemployment rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Trinidad and Tobago 0 Best: Myanmar 100
87.9% |
87.9Value: 87.9
|
university-industry collaboration in r&d  |
Initial Value: 1
|
78.5 |
16 |
Worst: Angola 16 Best: Israel 78.5
60% |
53.5Value: 53.5
|
citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Cyprus 100
28.2% |
28.2Value: 28.2
|
inputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 121 / Score 18.42 |
gerd (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Israel 100
4.4% |
4.4Value: 4.4
|
gerd per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Botswana 100
25.5% |
25.5Value: 25.5
|
researchers per thousand labor force  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Denmark 100
2.6% |
2.6Value: 2.6
|
tertiary graduates from stem programs (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Eswatini 0 Best: Gambia 100
35.9% |
35.9Value: 35.9
|
gerd performed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
0.5% |
0.5Value: 0.5
|
gerd financed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Brunei Darussalam 0 Best: Thailand 100
9.9% |
9.9Value: 9.9
|
researchers in business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mozambique 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
8.8% |
8.8Value: 8.8
|
firms that spend on r&d (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Lesotho 0 Best: Finland 100
1.9% |
1.9Value: 1.9
|
high-skilled employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mali 0 Best: United States 100
19.2% |
19.2Value: 19.2
|
intellectual property payments (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Armenia 0 Best: Ireland 100
24% |
24Value: 24
|
state of cluster development  |
Initial Value: 1
|
74.9 |
23.5 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 23.5 Best: Italy 74.9
69.84% |
59.4Value: 59.4
|
outputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 113 / Score 26.08 |
average documents per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0 Best: Panama 100
61.9% |
61.9Value: 61.9
|
citations per document  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Indonesia 0 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100
0% |
0Value: 0
|
patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Tanzania 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
42.4% |
42.4Value: 42.4
|
intellectual property receipts (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: Netherlands 100
8.5% |
8.5Value: 8.5
|
industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0 Best: China 100
4.4% |
4.4Value: 4.4
|
pct applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Pakistan 0 Best: Barbados 100
17.8% |
17.8Value: 17.8
|
firms producing new goods and services (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Egypt 0 Best: Finland 100
6.1% |
6.1Value: 6.1
|
trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: China 100
17.5% |
17.5Value: 17.5
|
cultural goods exports (% exports)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Algeria 0 Best: St. Lucia 100
39.5% |
39.5Value: 39.5
|
printing and publishing output (% manufactured output)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0 Best: Kenya 100
19.8% |
19.8Value: 19.8
|
impact
Rank 95 / Score 25.36 |
research institutions prominence  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Albania 0 Best: China 100
26.5% |
26.5Value: 26.5
|
growth of innovative companies  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Sierra Leone 0 Best: Belarus 100
8.6% |
8.6Value: 8.6
|
iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.8 |
0.4 |
Worst: Jamaica 0.4 Best: Israel 80.8
78.86% |
63.8Value: 63.8
|
iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Bulgaria 100
6.5% |
6.5Value: 6.5
|
gerd financed from abroad (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Algeria 0 Best: Israel 100
0.1% |
0.1Value: 0.1
|
joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0 Best: Israel 100
3% |
3Value: 3
|
computer software spending (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0 Best: United States 100
31.8% |
31.8Value: 31.8
|
new business density per thousand population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Liberia 0 Best: Botswana 100
1.5% |
1.5Value: 1.5
|
firms with new product/service (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: St. Lucia 0 Best: Lesotho 100
74.7% |
74.7Value: 74.7
|
infrastructure
Rank 93 / Score 41.64 |
3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Armenia 100
97.3% |
97.3Value: 97.3
|
secure internet servers per 1 million population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Denmark 100
8% |
8Value: 8
|
investment in telecommunication services (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mauritania 0 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100
23.6% |
23.6Value: 23.6
|
mobile upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
12.1% |
12.1Value: 12.1
|
fixed-broadband upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Algeria 0 Best: Singapore 100
7% |
7Value: 7
|
fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Switzerland 100
7.8% |
7.8Value: 7.8
|
fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Kuwait 100
57.5% |
57.5Value: 57.5
|
mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
61.5% |
61.5Value: 61.5
|
internet and telephony competition  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Albania 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
access
Rank 61 / Score 43.92 |
active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
38.9% |
38.9Value: 38.9
|
international internet bandwidth per user  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
47.6% |
47.6Value: 47.6
|
households with internet access at home (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
78.3% |
78.3Value: 78.3
|
individuals with standard ict skills (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Togo 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
35% |
35Value: 35
|
tertiary graduates from ict programs (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Eswatini 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
59.6% |
59.6Value: 59.6
|
ict employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Israel 100
4.1% |
4.1Value: 4.1
|
usage
Rank 101 / Score 35.98 |
government online services  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: State of Palestine 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
68.2% |
68.2Value: 68.2
|
fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Kuwait 100
10.3% |
10.3Value: 10.3
|
mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Kuwait 100
18.1% |
18.1Value: 18.1
|
internet users (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
51.2% |
51.2Value: 51.2
|
ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Indonesia 0 Best: Barbados 100
0% |
0Value: 0
|
e-participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: State of Palestine 0 Best: Estonia 100
75% |
75Value: 75
|
internet activities by individuals (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Denmark 100
8.2% |
8.2Value: 8.2
|
trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0 Best: Ireland 100
56.8% |
56.8Value: 56.8
|
economic competitiveness
Rank 36 / Score 62.22 |
gross fixed capital formation (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Iraq 0 Best: Tanzania 100
72% |
72Value: 72
|
logistics performance  |
Initial Value: 1
|
80 |
23.7 |
Worst: Afghanistan 23.7 Best: Germany 80
53.46% |
53.8Value: 53.8
|
transport productive capacity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mauritania 0 Best: Belize 100
16.1% |
16.1Value: 16.1
|
building quality control  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
13.3 |
Worst: Liberia 13.3 Best: China 100
90.77% |
92Value: 92
|
ease of starting a business  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
52.4 |
Worst: Cambodia 52.4 Best: New Zealand 100
60.5% |
81.2Value: 81.2
|
insolvency recovery rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Japan 100
71.1% |
71.1Value: 71.1
|
entrepreneurial employee activity rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: China 0 Best: Denmark 100
11.6% |
11.6Value: 11.6
|
extent of corporate transparency  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Australia 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
economic openness
Rank 70 / Score 57.07 |
trade (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Sudan 0 Best: Ireland 100
10.8% |
10.8Value: 10.8
|
high-technology trade (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
51.6% |
51.6Value: 51.6
|
product concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.2 |
10.9 |
Worst: Chad 10.9 Best: Croatia 94.2
92.08% |
87.6Value: 87.6
|
market concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.9 |
45.7 |
Worst: Bhutan 45.7 Best: Ukraine 96.9
93.36% |
93.5Value: 93.5
|
chinn-ito financial openness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: Australia 100
41.7% |
41.7Value: 41.7
|
foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: Cyprus 100
38.1% |
38.1Value: 38.1
|
debt dynamics  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mozambique 0 Best: Australia 100
80% |
80Value: 80
|
financing and domestic value added
Rank 55 / Score 54.42 |
domestic credit to private sector (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
13.9% |
13.9Value: 13.9
|
msme financing gap (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Philippines 0 Best: North Macedonia 100
63.8% |
63.8Value: 63.8
|
tax and contribution rate (% profit)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Argentina 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
77.5% |
77.5Value: 77.5
|
bank non-performing loans (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
89.1% |
89.1Value: 89.1
|
medium- and high-tech activities value added  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Cambodia 0 Best: Singapore 100
43.7% |
43.7Value: 43.7
|
industry and services value added (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Sierra Leone 0 Best: Kuwait 100
60.5% |
60.5Value: 60.5
|
labor underutilization rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Benin 0 Best: Thailand 100
77.5% |
77.5Value: 77.5
|
output per worker  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
9.4% |
9.4Value: 9.4
|
governance
Rank 79 / Score 44.48 |
peace and stability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.6 |
0.5 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.5 Best: New Zealand 97.6
28.63% |
28.3Value: 28.3
|
voice and accountability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
3.4 |
Worst: Lao PDR 3.4 Best: Norway 100
50.52% |
52.2Value: 52.2
|
rule of law  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Venezuela 0 Best: Finland 100
41.8% |
41.8Value: 41.8
|
control of corruption  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
1.9 |
Worst: Yemen 1.9 Best: Denmark 100
37.72% |
38.9Value: 38.9
|
government effectiveness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0.5 |
Worst: Yemen 0.5 Best: Singapore 100
65.23% |
65.4Value: 65.4
|
socio-economic
Rank 79 / Score 55.88 |
female-to-male ratio in parliament  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Yemen 0 Best: Mexico 100
26.7% |
26.7Value: 26.7
|
female-to-male labor force participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Yemen 0 Best: Burundi 100
62.3% |
62.3Value: 62.3
|
female-to-male ratio in internet usage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
52.1 |
Worst: Burundi 52.1 Best: Armenia 100
78.29% |
89.6Value: 89.6
|
social protection coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Uganda 0 Best: Australia 100
25.7% |
25.7Value: 25.7
|
adult literacy rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Ukraine 100
94.9% |
94.9Value: 94.9
|
youth not in employment, education or training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Iraq 0 Best: Japan 100
57.9% |
57.9Value: 57.9
|
poverty headcount ratio (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: China 100
87.4% |
87.4Value: 87.4
|
gdp per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
9.8% |
9.8Value: 9.8
|
health and environment
Rank 131 / Score 56.05 |
universal health coverage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
87 |
28 |
Worst: Chad 28 Best: Australia 87
49.15% |
57Value: 57
|
healthy life expectancy (years)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Lesotho 0 Best: Japan 100
62.3% |
62.3Value: 62.3
|
under-five mortality rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Nigeria 0 Best: Iceland 100
81% |
81Value: 81
|
renewable energy consumption (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bahrain 0 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100
21.6% |
21.6Value: 21.6
|
ecological footprint per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Luxembourg 0 Best: Yemen 100
91.4% |
91.4Value: 91.4
|
natural hazard exposure  |
Initial Value: 1
|
95 |
16 |
Worst: Philippines 16 Best: Finland 95
8.86% |
23Value: 23
|