KPI  |
2021 |
Weight  |
Best |
Worst |
Aspirational value  |
Iran, Islamic Rep. |
knowledge capital
Rank 69 / Score 71.93 |
net enrollment rate in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mali 0 Best: France 100
99.3% |
99.3Value: 99.3
|
net enrollment rate in lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Tanzania 0 Best: Israel 100
93.4% |
93.4Value: 93.4
|
net enrollment rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Azerbaijan 100
69.7% |
69.7Value: 69.7
|
years of compulsory education in primary and secondary  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Germany 100
69.2% |
69.2Value: 69.2
|
completion rate in upper secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Kazakhstan 100
72.7% |
72.7Value: 72.7
|
gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
73.9% |
73.9Value: 73.9
|
assessment of 15-year-old students in math, science and reading  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0 Best: China 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
learning-adjusted years of schooling  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Liberia 0 Best: Singapore 100
56.4% |
56.4Value: 56.4
|
educational enabling environment
Rank 123 / Score 42.37 |
government expenditure on primary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0 Best: Timor-Leste 100
27.4% |
27.4Value: 27.4
|
government expenditure on secondary education (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Tunisia 100
22.7% |
22.7Value: 22.7
|
government funding per primary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Kazakhstan 0 Best: Croatia 100
26.4% |
26.4Value: 26.4
|
government funding per secondary student (% gdp per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Guatemala 0 Best: Tunisia 100
26% |
26Value: 26
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Kuwait 100
77.3% |
77.3Value: 77.3
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
79.7% |
79.7Value: 79.7
|
schools with access to computers in primary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Armenia 100
27.1% |
27.1Value: 27.1
|
schools with access to computers in secondary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Albania 100
51% |
51Value: 51
|
gross enrollment ratio in early childhood education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Yemen 0 Best: Liberia 100
42.7% |
42.7Value: 42.7
|
proportion of children who are developmentally on track  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Serbia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
proportion of children with stimulating home learning environments  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Gambia 0 Best: Serbia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Armenia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
30.2 |
Worst: Niger 30.2 Best: Czech Republic 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mozambique 0 Best: Iceland 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
completion rate in upper secondary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
2.4 |
Worst: Niger 2.4 Best: Austria 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
tvet components
Rank 59 / Score 47.72 |
firms offering formal training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Timor-Leste 0 Best: China 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
Labor force with short-cycle tertiary education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Latvia 100
50.4% |
50.4Value: 50.4
|
participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Viet Nam 0 Best: Paraguay 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
government expenditure on vocational education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Netherlands 100
43.2% |
43.2Value: 43.2
|
Share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programs  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Jamaica 0 Best: Bolivia 100
21.4% |
21.4Value: 21.4
|
share of students enrolled in post-secondary vocational programmes  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Israel 0 Best: Australia 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
extent of staff training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
79 |
24.1 |
Worst: Mauritania 24.1 Best: Switzerland 79
18.58% |
34.3Value: 34.3
|
quality of vocational training  |
Initial Value: 1
|
90.8 |
25.6 |
Worst: Angola 25.6 Best: Switzerland 90.8
24.39% |
41.5Value: 41.5
|
ratio of high-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Botswana 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
ratio of medium-skill tvet occupations earnings to average wage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Malawi 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
tvet labor market
Rank 62 / Score 62.67 |
firms constrained with inadequately educated workforce (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: South Africa 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
employment educational mismatch (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burkina Faso 0 Best: Romania 100
67.9% |
67.9Value: 67.9
|
proportion of skilled production workers  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mauritania 0 Best: South Africa 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
unemployment rate with vocational education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0 Best: Qatar 100
72.3% |
72.3Value: 72.3
|
share of tvet occupations  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Qatar 100
67.6% |
67.6Value: 67.6
|
manufacturing employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Lesotho 100
61.1% |
61.1Value: 61.1
|
enrollment in vocational education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.9 |
5.6 |
Worst: Yemen 5.6 Best: Brunei Darussalam 99.9
50.58% |
53.3Value: 53.3
|
vulnerable employment rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Qatar 100
53.8% |
53.8Value: 53.8
|
inputs (higher education)
Rank 62 / Score 42.8 |
government expenditure per tertiary student  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: St. Lucia 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
11% |
11Value: 11
|
teaching staff compensation (% tertiary expenditure)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Kenya 0 Best: Indonesia 100
44.5% |
44.5Value: 44.5
|
enrollment in bachelor's or equivalent level (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Greece 100
27% |
27Value: 27
|
enrollment in master's, doctoral or equivalent (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: France 100
36.4% |
36.4Value: 36.4
|
pupil-teacher ratio in tertiary education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Sudan 0 Best: Lebanon 100
80.3% |
80.3Value: 80.3
|
researchers in higher education (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mali 0 Best: Senegal 100
57.6% |
57.6Value: 57.6
|
learning environment
Rank 150 / Score 22.07 |
teachers in tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.3 |
0 |
Worst: Myanmar 0 Best: Panama 99.3
51.86% |
51.5Value: 51.5
|
inbound mobility rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Australia 100
2.7% |
2.7Value: 2.7
|
academic freedom  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.2 |
4.1 |
Worst: Bahrain 4.1 Best: Uruguay 97.2
8.49% |
12Value: 12
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, gender parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
99.2 |
31.8 |
Worst: Niger 31.8 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 99.2
|
NAValue: NA
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, wealth parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
1 |
Worst: Mozambique 1 Best: Barbados 100
|
NAValue: NA
|
gross attendance ratio for tertiary education, location parity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
46 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: State of Palestine 46
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
outputs (higher education)
Rank 126 / Score 34.34 |
Educational attainment rate, bachelor’s or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Lithuania 100
46.4% |
46.4Value: 46.4
|
educational attainment rate, master's or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Guatemala 0 Best: Georgia 100
16.8% |
16.8Value: 16.8
|
educational attainment rate, doctoral or equivalent  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0 Best: Slovenia 100
17.6% |
17.6Value: 17.6
|
Labor force participation rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Venezuela 0 Best: Tanzania 100
40.6% |
40.6Value: 40.6
|
unemployment rate with advanced education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Trinidad and Tobago 0 Best: Myanmar 100
57.1% |
57.1Value: 57.1
|
university-industry collaboration in r&d  |
Initial Value: 1
|
78.5 |
16 |
Worst: Angola 16 Best: Israel 78.5
20.32% |
28.7Value: 28.7
|
citable documents per r&d personnel in higher education  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Cyprus 100
25.8% |
25.8Value: 25.8
|
inputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 57 / Score 30.75 |
gerd (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Israel 100
16.6% |
16.6Value: 16.6
|
gerd per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Botswana 100
21.3% |
21.3Value: 21.3
|
researchers per thousand labor force  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Denmark 100
27.9% |
27.9Value: 27.9
|
tertiary graduates from stem programs (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Eswatini 0 Best: Gambia 100
72% |
72Value: 72
|
gerd performed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
5.7% |
5.7Value: 5.7
|
gerd financed by business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Brunei Darussalam 0 Best: Thailand 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
researchers in business enterprises (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mozambique 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
23.2% |
23.2Value: 23.2
|
firms that spend on r&d (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Lesotho 0 Best: Finland 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
high-skilled employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mali 0 Best: United States 100
37.2% |
37.2Value: 37.2
|
intellectual property payments (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Armenia 0 Best: Ireland 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
state of cluster development  |
Initial Value: 1
|
74.9 |
23.5 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 23.5 Best: Italy 74.9
36.19% |
42.1Value: 42.1
|
outputs (research, development and innovation)
Rank 12 / Score 53.56 |
average documents per researcher  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Uzbekistan 0 Best: Panama 100
55.8% |
55.8Value: 55.8
|
citations per document  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Indonesia 0 Best: Kyrgyz Republic 100
23.7% |
23.7Value: 23.7
|
patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Tanzania 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
78% |
78Value: 78
|
intellectual property receipts (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: Netherlands 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
industrial design applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Dominican Republic 0 Best: China 100
86.9% |
86.9Value: 86.9
|
pct applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Pakistan 0 Best: Barbados 100
60.1% |
60.1Value: 60.1
|
firms producing new goods and services (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Egypt 0 Best: Finland 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
trademark applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: China 100
100% |
100Value: 100
|
cultural goods exports (% exports)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Algeria 0 Best: St. Lucia 100
3.2% |
3.2Value: 3.2
|
printing and publishing output (% manufactured output)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0 Best: Kenya 100
4% |
4Value: 4
|
impact
Rank 139 / Score 15 |
research institutions prominence  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Albania 0 Best: China 100
60.3% |
60.3Value: 60.3
|
growth of innovative companies  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Sierra Leone 0 Best: Belarus 100
5.5% |
5.5Value: 5.5
|
iso 9001 quality certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
80.8 |
0.4 |
Worst: Jamaica 0.4 Best: Israel 80.8
58.08% |
47.1Value: 47.1
|
iso 14001 environmental certificates (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Bulgaria 100
3.9% |
3.9Value: 3.9
|
gerd financed from abroad (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Algeria 0 Best: Israel 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
joint ventures per strategic alliance deals (per billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Cape Verde 0 Best: Israel 100
0.4% |
0.4Value: 0.4
|
computer software spending (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0 Best: United States 100
27.2% |
27.2Value: 27.2
|
new business density per thousand population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Liberia 0 Best: Botswana 100
2% |
2Value: 2
|
firms with new product/service (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: St. Lucia 0 Best: Lesotho 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
infrastructure
Rank 88 / Score 42.86 |
3g/4g mobile network coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: Armenia 100
80.7% |
80.7Value: 80.7
|
secure internet servers per 1 million population  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Denmark 100
9.2% |
9.2Value: 9.2
|
investment in telecommunication services (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mauritania 0 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100
23.6% |
23.6Value: 23.6
|
mobile upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Niger 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
24.8% |
24.8Value: 24.8
|
fixed-broadband upload and download speeds  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Algeria 0 Best: Singapore 100
5.8% |
5.8Value: 5.8
|
fixed-broadband subscriptions by speed per hundred people  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Switzerland 100
12% |
12Value: 12
|
fixed broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Kuwait 100
90.2% |
90.2Value: 90.2
|
mobile broadband basket (% gni per capita)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Congo, Democratic Rep. 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
69.4% |
69.4Value: 69.4
|
internet and telephony competition  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: Albania 100
70% |
70Value: 70
|
access
Rank 76 / Score 39.8 |
active mobile-broadband subscriptions per hundred inhabitants  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
40.5% |
40.5Value: 40.5
|
international internet bandwidth per user  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Ethiopia 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
37.3% |
37.3Value: 37.3
|
households with internet access at home (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
93.5% |
93.5Value: 93.5
|
individuals with standard ict skills (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Togo 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
9.4% |
9.4Value: 9.4
|
tertiary graduates from ict programs (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Eswatini 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
46.5% |
46.5Value: 46.5
|
ict employment (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Israel 100
11.6% |
11.6Value: 11.6
|
usage
Rank 107 / Score 34.3 |
government online services  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: State of Palestine 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
58.8% |
58.8Value: 58.8
|
fixed broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Kuwait 100
5.1% |
5.1Value: 5.1
|
mobile broadband internet traffic per subscription  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bhutan 0 Best: Kuwait 100
20.6% |
20.6Value: 20.6
|
internet users (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: United Arab Emirates 100
83.2% |
83.2Value: 83.2
|
ict pct patent applications (per 100 billion gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Indonesia 0 Best: Barbados 100
35.6% |
35.6Value: 35.6
|
e-participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: State of Palestine 0 Best: Estonia 100
46.4% |
46.4Value: 46.4
|
internet activities by individuals (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Azerbaijan 0 Best: Denmark 100
19.7% |
19.7Value: 19.7
|
trade in digitally deliverable services (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Lao PDR 0 Best: Ireland 100
5% |
5Value: 5
|
economic competitiveness
Rank 119 / Score 42.6 |
gross fixed capital formation (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Iraq 0 Best: Tanzania 100
49.4% |
49.4Value: 49.4
|
logistics performance  |
Initial Value: 1
|
80 |
23.7 |
Worst: Afghanistan 23.7 Best: Germany 80
40.14% |
46.3Value: 46.3
|
transport productive capacity  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mauritania 0 Best: Belize 100
14.1% |
14.1Value: 14.1
|
building quality control  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
13.3 |
Worst: Liberia 13.3 Best: China 100
88.47% |
90Value: 90
|
ease of starting a business  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
52.4 |
Worst: Cambodia 52.4 Best: New Zealand 100
32.35% |
67.8Value: 67.8
|
insolvency recovery rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Japan 100
39.2% |
39.2Value: 39.2
|
entrepreneurial employee activity rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: China 0 Best: Denmark 100
5.4% |
5.4Value: 5.4
|
extent of corporate transparency  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Australia 100
28.6% |
28.6Value: 28.6
|
economic openness
Rank 134 / Score 41.27 |
trade (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Sudan 0 Best: Ireland 100
12.2% |
12.2Value: 12.2
|
high-technology trade (% total trade)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
product concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
94.2 |
10.9 |
Worst: Chad 10.9 Best: Croatia 94.2
67.71% |
67.3Value: 67.3
|
market concentration  |
Initial Value: 1
|
96.9 |
45.7 |
Worst: Bhutan 45.7 Best: Ukraine 96.9
78.52% |
85.9Value: 85.9
|
chinn-ito financial openness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: Australia 100
0% |
0Value: 0
|
foreign direct investment, net inflows (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: Cyprus 100
32.2% |
32.2Value: 32.2
|
debt dynamics  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Mozambique 0 Best: Australia 100
50% |
50Value: 50
|
financing and domestic value added
Rank 110 / Score 43.75 |
domestic credit to private sector (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0 Best: Hong Kong SAR 100
24.7% |
24.7Value: 24.7
|
msme financing gap (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Philippines 0 Best: North Macedonia 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
tax and contribution rate (% profit)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Argentina 0 Best: Brunei Darussalam 100
62.7% |
62.7Value: 62.7
|
bank non-performing loans (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Angola 0 Best: Korea, Rep. 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
medium- and high-tech activities value added  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Cambodia 0 Best: Singapore 100
52.4% |
52.4Value: 52.4
|
industry and services value added (% gdp)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Sierra Leone 0 Best: Kuwait 100
66.9% |
66.9Value: 66.9
|
labor underutilization rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Benin 0 Best: Thailand 100
39.4% |
39.4Value: 39.4
|
output per worker  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
16.5% |
16.5Value: 16.5
|
governance
Rank 146 / Score 12.18 |
peace and stability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
97.6 |
0.5 |
Worst: Afghanistan 0.5 Best: New Zealand 97.6
7.21% |
7.5Value: 7.5
|
voice and accountability  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
3.4 |
Worst: Lao PDR 3.4 Best: Norway 100
4.97% |
8.2Value: 8.2
|
rule of law  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Venezuela 0 Best: Finland 100
20.2% |
20.2Value: 20.2
|
control of corruption  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
1.9 |
Worst: Yemen 1.9 Best: Denmark 100
12.74% |
14.4Value: 14.4
|
government effectiveness  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0.5 |
Worst: Yemen 0.5 Best: Singapore 100
14.47% |
14.9Value: 14.9
|
socio-economic
Rank 145 / Score 31.96 |
female-to-male ratio in parliament  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Yemen 0 Best: Mexico 100
5.9% |
5.9Value: 5.9
|
female-to-male labor force participation  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Yemen 0 Best: Burundi 100
17.2% |
17.2Value: 17.2
|
female-to-male ratio in internet usage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
52.1 |
Worst: Burundi 52.1 Best: Armenia 100
68.27% |
84.8Value: 84.8
|
social protection coverage (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Uganda 0 Best: Australia 100
25.7% |
25.7Value: 25.7
|
adult literacy rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Chad 0 Best: Ukraine 100
81.4% |
81.4Value: 81.4
|
youth not in employment, education or training (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Iraq 0 Best: Japan 100
40.5% |
40.5Value: 40.5
|
poverty headcount ratio (% population)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Madagascar 0 Best: China 100
0% |
NAValue: NA
|
gdp per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Burundi 0 Best: Luxembourg 100
10.7% |
10.7Value: 10.7
|
health and environment
Rank 119 / Score 57.98 |
universal health coverage  |
Initial Value: 1
|
87 |
28 |
Worst: Chad 28 Best: Australia 87
74.58% |
72Value: 72
|
healthy life expectancy (years)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Lesotho 0 Best: Japan 100
73.8% |
73.8Value: 73.8
|
under-five mortality rate  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Nigeria 0 Best: Iceland 100
89.6% |
89.6Value: 89.6
|
renewable energy consumption (%)  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Bahrain 0 Best: Congo, Democratic Rep. 100
1% |
1Value: 1
|
ecological footprint per capita  |
Initial Value: 1
|
100 |
0 |
Worst: Luxembourg 0 Best: Yemen 100
78.5% |
78.5Value: 78.5
|
natural hazard exposure  |
Initial Value: 1
|
95 |
16 |
Worst: Philippines 16 Best: Finland 95
21.52% |
33Value: 33
|